Cited by 36Online Learning and AnalyticsEvasion and Academic Success FactorsCustomer churn and segmentation

Predicting Student Dropout in a MOOC: An Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network Model

Imran, Ali Shariq, Dalipi, Fisnik, Kastrati, Zenun·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have transformed the way educational institutions deliver high-quality educational material to the onsite and distance learners across the globe. As a result, a new paradigm shifts as to how learners acquire and benefit from the wealth of knowledge provided by a MOOC at their doorstep nowadays in contrast to the brick and mortar settings is visible. Learners are therefore showing a profound interest in the MOOCs offered by top universities and industry giants. They have also attracted a vast number of students from far-flung areas of the world. The massive number of registered students in MOOCs, however, pose one major challenge, i.e., 'the dropouts'. Course planners and content providers are struggling to retain the registered students, which give rise to a new research agenda focusing on predicting and explaining student dropout and low completion rates in a MOOC. Machine learning techniques utilizing deep learning approaches can efficiently predict the potential dropouts and can raise an alert well before time. In this paper, we have focused our study on the application of feed-forward deep neural network architectures to address this problem. Our model achieves not only high accuracy, but also low false negative rate while predicting dropouts on the MOOC data. Moreover, we also provide an in-depth comparison of the proposed architectures concerning precision, recall, and F1 measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3330482.3330514

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent developments in predicting student attrition propose the use of data acquired from disparate sources in addition to more sophisticated algorithms such as deep feed-forward neural networks and hybrid logit leaf model.

    “Recent developments in predicting student attrition propose the use of data acquired from disparate sources in addition to more sophisticated algorithms such as deep feed-forward neural networks (Imran et al., 2019) and hybrid logit leaf model (Coussement et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imran, A. S., Dalipi, F., & Kastrati, Z.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
  • Linnaeus University (SE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-04-19
Pages
190-195
OpenAlex
W2966808979
Cited by
36
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
FWCI
6.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
Keywords
student dropout prediction, MOOCs, massive open online courses, course completion, student retention, feedforward neural networks, deep learning, online learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review