Cited by 26Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Bayesian Personalized Feature Interaction Selection for Factorization Machines

Chen, Yifan, Ren, Pengjie, Wang, Yang, de Rijke, Maarten·2019·Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

Factorization Machines (FMs) are widely used for feature-based collaborative filtering tasks, as they are very effective at modeling feature interactions. Existing FM-based methods usually take all feature interactions into account, which is unreasonable because not all feature interactions are helpful: incorporating useless feature interactions will introduce noise and degrade the recommendation performance. Recently, methods that perform Feature Interaction Selection (FIS) have attracted attention because of their effectiveness at filtering out useless feature interactions. However, they assume that all users share the same feature interactions, which is not necessarily true, especially for collaborative filtering tasks. In this work, we address this issue and study Personalized Feature Interaction Selection (P-FIS) by proposing a Bayesian Personalized Feature Interaction Selection (BP-FIS) mechanism under the Bayesian Variable Selection (BVS) theory. Specifically, we first introduce interaction selection variables with hereditary spike and slab priors for P-FIS. Then, we form a Bayesian generative model and derive the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO), which can be optimized by an efficient Stochastic Gradient Variational Bayes (SGVB) method to learn the parameters. Finally, because BP-FIS can be seamlessly integrated with different variants of FMs, we implement two FM variants under the proposed BP-FIS. We carry out experiments on three benchmark datasets. The empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of BP-FIS for selecting personalized interactions and improving the recommendation performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3331184.3331196

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The search strategy shifts from discrete reinforcement learning to differentiable searching, which adaptively selects architectures within one-shot learning to circumvent computational burden, for more efficient convergence.

    “The search strategy shifts from the discrete reinforcement learning process, which iteratively samples architectures for training and is time-consuming, into the differentiable searching, which adaptively selects architectures within one-shot learning to circumvent the computational burden, for more efficient convergence.”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 26

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Michal Aharon Natalie Aizenberg Edward Bortnikov Ronny Lempel Roi Adadi and etc. 2013. OFF-set: One-pass Factorization of Feature Sets for Online Recommendation in Persistent Cold Start Settings. In RecSys. ACM 375--378. 10.1145/2507157.2507221 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/02664763.2018.1432576 · DOI
  3. 10.5555/2981780.2981790 · DOI
  4. Mathieu Blondel Akinori Fujino Naonori Ueda and Masakazu Ishihata. 2016. Higher-Order Factorization Machines. In NIPS. 3351--3359. · DOI
  5. Mathieu Blondel Masakazu Ishihata Akinori Fujino and Naonori Ueda. 2016. Polynomial Networks and Factorization Machines: New Insights and Efficient Training Algorithms. In ICML. ACM 850--858. · DOI
  6. 10.1145/2043932.2044016 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kailong Chen Tianqi Chen Guoqing Zheng Ou Jin Enpeng Yao and Yong Yu. 2012. Collaborative Personalized Tweet Recommendation. In SIGIR. ACM 661--670. 10.1145/2348283.2348372 · DOI
  8. Yifan Chen, Yang Wang, Xiang Zhao, Hongzhi Yin, Ilya Markov, and Maarten de Rijke. 2019. Local Variational Feature-based Similarity Models for Recommending Top-N New Items. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (2019). To appear.
  9. Yifan Chen Xiang Zhao and Maarten de Rijke. 2017. Top-N Recommendation with High-dimensional Side Information via Locality Preserving Projection. In SIGIR. ACM 985--988. 10.1145/3077136.3080697 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TKDE.2018.2830336 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/2645710.2645730 · DOI
  12. Heng-Tze Cheng Levent Koc Jeremiah Harmsen Tal Shaked Tushar Chandra Hrishi Aradhye Glen Anderson Greg Corrado Wei Chai Mustafa Ispir Rohan Anil Zakaria Haque Lichan Hong Vihan Jain Xiaobing Liu and Hemal Shah. 2016. Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systems. In DLRS. 7--10. 10.1145/2988450.2988454 · DOI
  13. 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm08281 · DOI
  14. 10.1023/A:1013164120801 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/LSP.2006.873139 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/2827872 · DOI
  17. Xiangnan He and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural Factorization Machines for Sparse Predictive Analytics. In SIGIR. ACM 355--364. 10.1145/3077136.3080777 · DOI
  18. Yuchin Juan Damien Lefortier and Olivier Chapelle. 2017. Field-aware Factorization Machines in a Real-world Online Advertising System. In WWW. 680--688. 10.1145/3041021.3054185 · DOI
  19. Yu-Chin Juan Yong Zhuang Wei-Sheng Chin and Chih-Jen Lin. 2016. Field-aware Factorization Machines for CTR Prediction. In RecSys. ACM 43--50. 10.1145/2959100.2959134 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/2487575.2487589 · DOI
  21. George Karypis. 2001. Evaluation of Item-Based Top-N Recommendation Algorithms. In CIKM. ACM 247--254. 10.1145/502585.502627 · DOI
  22. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In ICLR.
  23. Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. 2014. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. In ICLR.
  24. Noam Koenigstein and Ulrich Paquet. 2013. Xbox Movies Recommendations: Variational Bayes Matrix Factorization with Embedded Feature Selection. In RecSys. ACM 129--136. 10.1145/2507157.2507168 · DOI
  25. Yehuda Koren. 2008. Factorization Meets the Neighborhood: A Multifaceted Collaborative Filtering Model. In SIGKDD. ACM 426--434. 10.1145/1401890.1401944 · DOI
  26. Jing Li Pengjie Ren Zhumin Chen Zhaochun Ren Tao Lian and Jun Ma. 2017. Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendation. In CIKM. ACM 1419--1428. 10.1145/3132847.3132926 · DOI
  27. Jundong Li Liang Wu Harsh Dani and Huan Liu. 2018. Unsupervised Personalized Feature Selection. In AAAI. 3514--3521.
  28. Dawen Liang Rahul G. Krishnan Matthew D. Hoffman and Tony Jebara. 2018. Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filtering. In WWW. 689--698. 10.1145/3178876.3186150 · DOI
  29. Xiao Lin Wenpeng Zhang Min Zhang Wenwu Zhu Jian Pei Peilin Zhao and Junzhou Huang. 2018. Online Compact Convexified Factorization Machine. In WWW. 1633--1642. 10.1145/3178876.3186075 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/3018661.3018716 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/ISM.2017.42 · DOI
  32. Peter McCullagh and John A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Vol. 37. CRC press.
  33. Lei Mei Pengjie Ren Zhumin Chen Liqiang Nie Jun Ma and Jian-Yun Nie. 2018. An Attentive Interaction Network for Context-aware Recommendations. In CIKM. ACM 157--166. 10.1145/3269206.3271813 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478694 · DOI
  35. Trung V. Nguyen Alexandros Karatzoglou and Linas Baltrunas. 2014. Gaussian Process Factorization Machines for Context-aware Recommendations. In SIGIR. ACM 63--72. 10.1145/2600428.2609623 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/ICDM.2011.134 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/ICDM.2016.0051 · DOI
  38. Rajiv Pasricha and Julian McAuley. 2018. Translation-based Factorization Machines for Sequential Recommendation. In RecSys. ACM 63--71. 10.1145/3240323.3240356 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/ICDM.2010.127 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1145/2168752.2168771 · DOI
  41. Steffen Rendle. 2012. Learning Recommender Systems with Adaptive Regularization. In WSDM. ACM 133--142. 10.1145/2124295.2124313 · DOI
  42. 10.5555/1795114.1795167 · DOI
  43. Steffen Rendle Zeno Gantner Christoph Freudenthaler and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2011. Fast Context-aware Recommendations with Factorization Machines. In SIGIR. ACM 635--644. 10.1145/2009916.2010002 · DOI
  44. Steffen Rendle and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2010. Pairwise Interaction Tensor Factorization for Personalized Tag Recommendation. In WSDM. ACM 81--90. 10.1145/1718487.1718498 · DOI
  45. Royi Ronen Noam Koenigstein Elad Ziklik and Nir Nice. 2013. Selecting Content-based Features for Collaborative Filtering Recommenders. In RecSys. ACM 407--410. 10.1145/2507157.2507203 · DOI
  46. 10.1145/2939672.2939704 · DOI
  47. 10.5555/2976040.2976207 · DOI
  48. 10.5555/1481236 · DOI
  49. Robert Tibshirani. 1996. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. J. Royal Statist. Soci. (1996) 267--288. · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.5555/2986459.2986720 · DOI
  51. Seiya Tokui and Issei Sato. 2016. Reparameterization Trick for Discrete Variables. CoRR, Vol. abs/1611.01239 (2016). arxiv: 1611.01239 · arXiv
  52. 10.1109/TIP.2012.2207397 · DOI
  53. 10.1109/TKDE.2015.2415497 · DOI
  54. 10.1109/TIP.2015.2457339 · DOI
  55. Mike West. 2003. Bayesian Factor Regression Models in the "Large p, Small n" Paradigm. In Bayesian Statistics. Oxford University Press, 723--732.
  56. Yao Wu Christopher DuBois Alice X. Zheng and Martin Ester. 2016. Collaborative Denoising Auto-Encoders for Top-N Recommender Systems. In WSDM. ACM 153--162. 10.1145/2835776.2835837 · DOI
  57. Jun Xiao Hao Ye Xiangnan He Hanwang Zhang Fei Wu and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Attentional Factorization Machines: Learning the Weight of Feature Interactions via Attention Networks. In IJCAI. 3119--3125. · DOI
  58. Jianpeng Xu, Kaixiang Lin, Pang-Ning Tan, and Jiayu Zhou. 2016. Synergies that Matter: Efficient Interaction Selection via Sparse Factorization Machine. In SDM. SIAM, 108--116.
  59. Makoto Yamada Wenzhao Lian Amit Goyal Jianhui Chen Kishan Wimalawarne and etc. 2017. Convex Factorization Machine for Toxicogenomics Prediction. In SIGKDD. ACM 1215--1224. 10.1145/3097983.3098103 · DOI
  60. Fajie Yuan Guibing Guo Joemon M. Jose Long Chen Haitao Yu and Weinan Zhang. 2017. BoostFM: Boosted Factorization Machines for Top-N Feature-based Recommendation. In IUI. 45--54. 10.1145/3025171.3025211 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x · DOI · Paper page
  62. Huan Zhao Quanming Yao Jianda Li Yangqiu Song and Dik Lun Lee. 2017. Meta-Graph Based Recommendation Fusion over Heterogeneous Information Networks. In SIGKDD. ACM 635--644. 10.1145/3097983.3098063 · DOI
  63. Yong Zheng Robin D. Burke and Bamshad Mobasher. 2013. Recommendation with Differential Context Weighting. In UMAP. 152--164. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., Ren, P., Wang, Y., & de Rijke, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Hefei University of Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-07-18
Pages
665-674
OpenAlex
W2954698196
Cited by
26
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61806035)
  • Ahold Delhaize
  • Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU)
  • Innovation Center for Artificial Intelligence (ICAI)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
factorization machines, Bayesian variable selection, spike-and-slab prior, collaborative filtering, recommender systems, evidence lower bound, generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review