The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis
Open accessAbstract
Techniques for automatic query expansion have been extensively studied in information research as a means of addressing the word mismatch between queries and documents. These techniques can be categorized as either global or local. While global techniques rely on analysis of a whole collection to discover word relationships, local techniques emphasize analysis of the top-ranked documents retrieved for a query. While local techniques have shown to be more effective that global techniques in general, existing local techniques are not robust and can seriously hurt retrieved when few of the retrieval documents are relevant. We propose a new technique, called local context analysis, which selects expansion terms based on cooccurrence with the query terms within the top-ranked documents. Experiments on a number of collections, both English and non-English, show that local context analysis offers more effective and consistent retrieval results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A language modeling approach to information retrieval
Ponte, J. M., & Croft, W. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/290941.291008 · Cited by 1,821
Self-citationThe sixth text Retrieval conference (TREC-6)
(1998) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.500-240 · Cited by 113
Cited by
A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval
Carpineto, C., & Romano, G. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2071389.2071390 · Cited by 1,109
Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions
Wu, H. C., Luk, R. W. P., Wong, K. F., & Kwok, K. L. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1361684.1361686 · Cited by 821
Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm
White, R. W., & Roth, R. A. (2009) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.2200/s00174ed1v01y200901icr003 · Cited by 632
Query Recommendation Using Query Logs in Search Engines
Baeza-Yates, R., Hurtado, C., & Mendoza, M. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30192-9_58 · Cited by 537
Placing search in context: the concept revisited
(2002) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/503104.503110 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, J., & Croft, W. B.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-112
- ISSN
- 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2868
- OpenAlex
- W2002306339
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/333135.333138
- The paper
- Xu, J., & Croft, W. B. (2000). Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/333135.333138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.