Cited by 22Innovative Human-Technology InteractionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSocial Media and Politics

"Taking Care of a Fruit Tree": Nurturing as a Layer of Concern in Online Community Moderation

Open access
Yu, Bingjie, Seering, Joseph, Spiel, Katta, Watts, Leon·2020·Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Care in communities has a powerful influence on potentially disruptive social encounters. Practising care in moderation means exposing a group's core values, which, in turn, has the potential to strengthen identity and relationships in communities. Dissent is as inevitable in online communities as it is in their offline counterparts. However, dissent can be productive by sparking discussions that drive the evolution of community norms and boundaries, and there is value in understanding the role of moderation in this process. Our work draws on an exploratory analysis of moderation practices in the MetaFilter community, focusing on cases of intervention and response. We identify and analyse MetaFilter moderation with the metaphor: "taking care of a fruit tree", which is quoted from an interview with moderators on MetaFilter. We address the relevance of care as it is evidenced in these MetaFilter exchanges, and discuss what it might mean to approach an analysis of online moderation practices with a focus on nurturing care. We consider how HCI researchers might make use of care-as-nurture as a frame to identify multi-faceted and nuanced concepts characterising dissent and to develop tools for the sustainable support of online communities and their moderators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3334480.3383009

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, B., Seering, J., Spiel, K., & Watts, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-25
Pages
1-9
OpenAlex
W3014021838
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
online community moderation, care, nurturing care, dissent, community norms, community identity, metaphor, moderators, online communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review