Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,033

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Byzantine generals problem

SRI International, Lamport, Leslie, Shostak, Robert, SRI International, Pease, Marshall, SRI International·2019·Concurrency: the Works of Leslie Lamport

Abstract

Abstract The Byzantine Generals Problem requires processes to reach agreement upon a value even though some of them may fad. It is weakened by allowing them to agree upon an "incorrect " value if a failure occurs. The transaction eormmt problem for a distributed database Js a special case of the weaker problem. It is shown that, like the original Byzantine Generals Problem, the weak version can be solved only ff fewer than one-third of the processes may fad. Unlike the onginal problem, an approximate solution exists that can tolerate arbaranly many failures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3335772.3335936

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,033

Metadata

Authors
International, S., Lamport, L., Shostak, R., International, S., Pease, M., & International, S.
Venue
Concurrency: the Works of Leslie Lamport
Published
2019-10-09
OpenAlex
W2120510885
Cited by
1,033
References
0
FWCI
180.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Byzantine generals problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3335772.3335936
The paper
International, S., Lamport, L., Shostak, R., International, S., Pease, M., & International, S. (2019). The Byzantine generals problem. Concurrency: the Works of Leslie Lamport. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335772.3335936

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.