Cited by 18Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Designing a wearable technology application for enhancing executive functioning skills in children with ADHD

Tavakoulnia, Arya, Guzman, Kayla, Cibrian, Franceli L., Lakes, Kimberley D., Hayes, Gillian, Schuck, Sabrina E. B.·2019·Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers

Abstract

There are limitations and poor adherence to pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions when treating children with ADHD. Wearable technology has great potential to overcome this limitation due to their portability and capability to measure biosignals. Unfortunately, the acceptance of this technology in children with ADHD has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to understand the acceptability of wearables and propose designs for applications to enhance executive functioning in these children. Results from a qualitative study involving children with ADHD and their teachers showed that concerns from the children outweighed the advantages for using smartwatch technology, and suggested that an application should mimic the current practices of self-regulation taught at their school and be able to monitor self-reflection of mood and behavior. These findings suggest that wearables can potentially be used as interventions supporting the executive function of children with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3341162.3343819

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across HCI studies, there is a tendency to design systems that address perceived neurodivergent behaviours from an external viewpoint without adequately considering internal struggles.

    “Across a number of studies [9, 29, 30, 39, 54, 55, 64, 74, 81, 90, 93], there is a noticeable tendency to design systems that address perceived neurodivergent behaviours, often from an external viewpoint, without adequately considering the internal struggles experienced by neurodivergent individuals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tavakoulnia, A., Guzman, K., Cibrian, F. L., Lakes, K. D., Hayes, G., & Schuck, S. E. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California System (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-09-09
Pages
222-225
OpenAlex
W2973223116
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) (publishedVersion)
  • ACM Proceedings
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1R21HS026058-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, wearable devices, executive function, children, smartwatches, technology acceptance, self-regulation, mobile health apps, teacher perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review