Cited by 24Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fairness, accountability, transparency in AI at scale: lessons from national programs

Ahmad, Muhammad Aurangzeb, Teredesai, Ankur, Eckert, Carly·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Abstract

The panel aims to elucidate how different national govenmental programs are implementing accountability of machine learning systems in healthcare and how accountability is operationlized in different cultural settings in legislation, policy and deployment. We have representatives from three different govenments, UAE, Singapore and Maldives who will discuss what accountability of AI and machine learning means in their contexts and use cases. We hope to have a fruitful conversation around FAT ML as it is operationalized ccross cultures, national boundries and legislative constraints.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3351095.3375690

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nineteen studies had mentioned human-centered considerations, and raised attention to educate citizens to become socially responsible and ethical users.

    “Nineteen studies had mentioned human-centered considerations, and raised attention to educate citizens to become socially responsible and ethical users (Ahmad, Teredesai, & Eckert, 2020).”

    From Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021) · cites this paper as Ahmad, Teredesai, & Eckert, 2020

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahmad, M. A., Teredesai, A., & Eckert, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-01-27
Pages
690-690
OpenAlex
W3214861879
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
fairness, accountability, and transparency, artificial intelligence in healthcare, AI regulation, national AI policy, cross-cultural comparison, Singapore, Maldives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review