Cited by 24Innovative Human-Technology InteractionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsRecommender Systems and Techniques

Love in Lyrics: An Exploration of Supporting Textual Manifestation of Affection in Social Messaging

Kim, Taewook, Lee, Jung Soo, Peng, Zhenhui, Ma, Xiaojuan·2019·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Affectionate communication, the conveyance of closeness, care, and fondness for another, plays a key role in romantic relationships. While the pervasive use of digital technology for communication limits affectionate interaction through nonverbal cues -- a major channel of expression in face-to-face settings, there have been few approaches which scaffold couples' romantic text conversations. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel interactive system Lily which gives users inspirations to enrich their romantic expressions in text messaging. It first listens to users' original input and then recommends romantic lyrics holding the closest meaning in real-time during chats with partners. After a three-day empirical study, participants who are real-life couples reported that they not only received useful cues from Lily in terms of how to polish their affectionate expressions, but also learnt to enrich the conversation with topics enlightened by its recommendations. Based on our findings, we finally provide several design considerations for actual deployment of such an application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3359181

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Personal context, planning and translating support are intermingled due to the frequent use of longer AI outputs that directly ideate and write for the user, though these are generally presented as suggestions in order to preserve the user's engagement with the text.

    “Planning and translating support are intermingled due to the frequent use of longer AI outputs that directly ideate and write for the user, though these are generally presented as suggestions in order to preserve the user's engagement with the text [15,65].”
  • In the Personal context, there is transformation of user inputs between modalities like speech to text or visuals to text, or between textual forms like keywords to prose.

    “We also see transformation of user inputs between modalities like speech to text or visuals to text [79,144], or between textual forms like keywords to prose [65].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, T., Lee, J. S., Peng, Z., & Ma, X.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Korea University (KR)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2019-11-07
Volume
3
Issue
CSCW
Pages
1-27
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026519521
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China (C6030-18G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
romantic relationships, affectionate communication, text messaging, Romantic lyric, real-time recommendation, couples communication, nonverbal cues, digital communication, design considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review