Cited by 95Misinformation and Its ImpactsCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

COVID-19 on Facebook Ads: Competing Agendas around a Public Health Crisis

Open access
Mejova, Yelena, Kalimeri, Kyriaki·2020·Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies

Abstract

In the age of social media, disasters and epidemics usher not only devastation and affliction in the physical world, but also prompt a deluge of information, opinions, prognoses and advice to billions of internet users. The coronavirus epidemic of 2019-2020, or COVID-19, is no exception, with the World Health Organization warning of a possible 'infodemic' of fake news. In this study, we examine the alternative narratives around the coronavirus outbreak through advertisements promoted on Facebook, the largest social media platform in the US. Using the new Facebook Ads Library, we discover advertisers from public health and non-profit sectors, alongside those from news media, politics, and business, incorporating coronavirus into their messaging and agenda. We find the virus used in political attacks, donation solicitations, business promotion, stock market advice, and animal rights campaigning. Among these, we find several instances of possible misinformation, ranging from bioweapons conspiracy theories to unverifiable claims by politicians, to the sale of face masks which may not necessarily protect the wearer. As we make the dataset available to the community, we hope the advertising domain will become an important part of quality control for public health communication and public discourse in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3378393.3402241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microtargeted ads reduced the likelihood of persuading Democrat respondents to vote for Democrat candidates.

    “microtargeted ads reduced the likelihood of persuading Democrat respondents to vote for Democrat candidates (Liberini et al. 2023;Mejova and Kalimeri 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mejova, Y., & Kalimeri, K.
Affiliations
Institute for Scientific Interchange (IT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-06-15
Pages
22-31
OpenAlex
W3039072316
Cited by
95
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 17
FWCI
42.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, Facebook advertising, infodemic, misinformation, fake news, political attacks, conspiracy theories, public health communication, agenda setting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review