Cited by 49Recommender Systems and TechniquesEthics and Social Impacts of AIAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Personality Bias of Music Recommendation Algorithms

Melchiorre, Alessandro B., Zangerle, Eva, Schedl, Markus·2020·Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

Abstract

Recommender systems, like other tools that make use of machine learning, are known to create or increase certain biases. Earlier work has already unveiled different performance of recommender systems for different user groups, depending on gender, age, country, and consumption behavior. In this work, we study user bias in terms of another aspect, i.e., users’ personality. We investigate to which extent state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms yield different accuracy scores depending on the users’ personality traits. We focus on the music domain and create a dataset of Twitter users’ music consumption behavior and personality traits, measuring the latter in terms of the OCEAN model. Investigating [email protected] and [email protected] of the recommendation algorithms SLIM, embarrassingly shallow autoencoders for sparse data (EASE), and variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering (Mult-VAE) on this dataset, we find several significant differences in performance between user groups scoring high vs. groups scoring low on several personality traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3383313.3412223

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melchiorre, A. B., Zangerle, E., & Schedl, M.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Venue
Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-09-22
Pages
533-538
OpenAlex
W3088329504
Cited by
48
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
music recommendation, recommender systems, algorithmic bias, personality traits, ocean model, user heterogeneity, Twitter users, collaborative filtering, SLIM, ease, recommendation accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review