The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wattch: a framework for architectural-level power analysis and optimizations
Abstract
Power dissipation and thermal issues are increasingly significant in modern processors. As a result, it is crucial that power/performance tradeoffs be made more visible to chip architects and even compiler writers, in addition to circuit designers. Most existing power analysis tools achieve high accuracy by calculating power estimates for designs only after layout or floorplanning are complete. In addition to being available only late in the design process, such tools are often quite slow, which compounds the difficulty of running them for a large space of design possibilities.This paper presents Wattch, a framework for analyzing and optimizing microprocessor power dissipation at the architecture-level. Wattch is 1000X or more faster than existing layout-level power tools, and yet maintains accuracy within 10% of their estimates as verified using industry tools on leading-edge designs. This paper presents several validations of Wattch's accuracy. In addition, we present three examples that demonstrate how architects or compiler writers might use Wattch to evaluate power consumption in their design process.We see Wattch as a complement to existing lower-level tools; it allows architects to explore and cull the design space early on, using faster, higher-level tools. It also opens up the field of power-efficient computing to a wider range of researchers by providing a power evaluation methodology within the portable and familiar SimpleScalar framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, S., Ahn, J. H., Strong, R. D., Brockman, J. B., Tullsen, D. M., & Jouppi, N. P. (2009) · Proceedings of the 42nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture · doi:10.1145/1669112.1669172 · Cited by 2,376
Data Center Energy Consumption Modeling: A Survey
Dayarathna, M., Wen, Y., & Fan, R. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2481183 · Cited by 1,165
PowerPack: Energy Profiling and Analysis of High-Performance Systems and Applications
Ge, R., Feng, X., Song, S., Chang, H.-C., Li, D., & Cameron, K. W. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2009.76 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, D., Tiwari, V., & Martonosi, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 27th annual international symposium on Computer architecture - ISCA '00
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 83-94
- ISSN
- 1063-6897 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102727118
- Cited by
- 2,578
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 294.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wattch: a framework for architectural-level power analysis and optimizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/339647.339657
- The paper
- Brooks, D., Tiwari, V., & Martonosi, M. (2000). Wattch: a framework for architectural-level power analysis and optimizations. Proceedings of the 27th annual international symposium on Computer architecture - ISCA '00. https://doi.org/10.1145/339647.339657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.