Cited by 11Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataRecommender Systems and TechniquesAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Data Poisoning Attacks against Differentially Private Recommender Systems

Wadhwa, Soumya, Agrawal, Saurabh, Chaudhari, Harsh, Sharma, Deepthi, Achan, Kannan·2020·Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

Recommender systems based on collaborative filtering are highly vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, where a determined attacker injects fake users with false user-item feedback, with an objective to either corrupt the recommender system or promote/demote a target set of items. Recently, differential privacy was explored as a defense technique against data poisoning attacks in the typical machine learning setting. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of differential privacy against such attacks on matrix factorization based collaborative filtering systems. Concretely, we conduct extensive experiments for evaluating robustness to injection of malicious user profiles by simulating common types of shilling attacks on real-world data and comparing the predictions of typical matrix factorization with differentially private matrix factorization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3397271.3401301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. C.Dwork and A.Roth. 2014. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science(2014). C.Dwork and A.Roth. 2014. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science(2014). · DOI · Paper page
  2. F. M. Harper and J. A. Konstan. 2015. The Movie Lens Datasets: History and Context. In ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS'15). F. M. Harper and J. A. Konstan. 2015. The Movie Lens Datasets: History and Context. In ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS'15).
  3. N. Hurley , Z. Cheng , and M. Zhang . 2009. Statistical attack detection . In ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09) . N. Hurley, Z. Cheng, and M. Zhang. 2009. Statistical attack detection. In ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09).
  4. B. Li Y. Wang A. Singh and Y. Vorobeychik. 2016. Data Poisoning Attacks on Factorization-Based Collaborative Filtering. In NeurIPS'16. B. Li Y. Wang A. Singh and Y. Vorobeychik. 2016. Data Poisoning Attacks on Factorization-Based Collaborative Filtering. In NeurIPS'16.
  5. Z. Liu Y.X. Wang and A. Smola. 2015. Fast Differentially Private Matrix Factorization. In RecSys'15. Z. Liu Y.X. Wang and A. Smola. 2015. Fast Differentially Private Matrix Factorization. In RecSys'15. · DOI
  6. Y. Ma , X. Zhu , and J. Hsu. 201 9. Data Poisoning against Differentially-Private Learners: Attacks and Defenses. In IJCAI'19. Y. Ma, X. Zhu, and J. Hsu. 2019. Data Poisoning against Differentially-Private Learners: Attacks and Defenses. In IJCAI'19.
  7. C. E. Seminario and D. C. Wilson . 2014. Attacking item-based recommender systems with power items . In ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys'14) . C. E. Seminario and D. C. Wilson. 2014. Attacking item-based recommender systems with power items. In ACM Conference on Recommender systems (RecSys'14).
  8. J. Steinhardt , P.W. Koh , and P. Liang . 2017 . Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attacks. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS'17) . J. Steinhardt, P.W. Koh, and P. Liang. 2017. Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attacks. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS'17).
  9. Y. X. Wang , S. Fienberg , and A. Smola . 2015. Privacy for free: Posterior sampling and stochastic gradient monte carlo . In ICML'15 . Y. X. Wang, S. Fienberg, and A. Smola. 2015. Privacy for free: Posterior sampling and stochastic gradient monte carlo. In ICML'15.
  10. Z. Yang and Z. Cai. 2017. Detecting abnormal profiles in collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. Z. Yang and Z. Cai. 2017. Detecting abnormal profiles in collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. · DOI
  11. Z. Zhang and S. R. Kulkarni . 2013. Graph-based detection of shilling attacks in recommender systems . In IEEE Workshop Machine Learning for Signal Processing. Z. Zhang and S. R. Kulkarni. 2013. Graph-based detection of shilling attacks in recommender systems. In IEEE Workshop Machine Learning for Signal Processing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Wadhwa, S., Agrawal, S., Chaudhari, H., Sharma, D., & Achan, K.
Affiliations
  • Walmart (United States) (US)
  • Walmart Labs, Bangalore, India
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
  • Walmart Labs, Sunnyvale, CA, India
Venue
Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-07-25
Pages
1617-1620
OpenAlex
W3035454601
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
data poisoning, differential privacy, recommender systems, collaborative filtering, shilling attacks, matrix factorization, robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review