Cited by 92Recommender Systems and TechniquesEthics and Social Impacts of AIAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Break the Loop: Gender Imbalance in Music Recommenders

Open access
Ferraro, Andres, Serra, Xavier, Bauer, Christine·2021·Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

Abstract

As recommender systems play an important role in everyday life, there is an increasing pressure that such systems are fair. Besides serving diverse groups of users, recommenders need to represent and serve item providers fairly as well. In interviews with music artists, we identified that gender fairness is one of the artists' main concerns. They emphasized that female artists should be given more exposure in music recommendations. We analyze a widely-used collaborative filtering approach with two public datasets-enriched with gender information-to understand how this approach performs with respect to the artists' gender. To achieve gender balance, we propose a progressive re-ranking method that is based on the insights from the interviews. For the evaluation, we rely on a simulation of feedback loops and provide an in-depth analysis using state-of-the-art performance measures and metrics concerning gen-der fairness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3406522.3446033

Cites

47 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bias often arises because the system prioritizes accuracy over fairness, favouring well-known items for recommendations without considering the satisfaction of all users.

    “The bias often arises because the system prioritizes accuracy over fairness, favouring well-known items for recommendations without considering the satisfaction of all users [37].”

    From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Related Work section says systems optimized for accuracy may privilege popular items that are not necessarily more satisfying for users. The claim strengthens this possibility into a frequent cause of bias and says the systems do not consider all users’ satisfaction, which the passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Christine Bauer. 2019. Allowing for equal opportunities for artists in music recommendation: a position paper. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Designing Human-Centric Music Information Research Systems (Delft, The Netherlands) (wsHCMIR '19). 16-18.
  2. Oscar Celma. 2010. Music recommendation. In Music Recommendation and Discovery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, Chapter 3, 43-85.
  3. Philipp Mayring. 2004. Qualitative content analysis. In A companion to qualitative research, Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardoff, and Ines Steinke (Eds.). Sage Publications, London, United Kingdom, Chapter 5.12, 159-176.
  4. Janice M. Morse. 1994. Designing funded qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, Yvonna S. Lincoln and Norman K. Denzin (Eds.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 220-235.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferraro, A., Serra, X., & Bauer, C.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-03-14
Pages
249-254
OpenAlex
W3135583098
Cited by
92
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11
FWCI
15.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Kakao Brain
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
gender equity, music recommendation, recommender systems, women artists, gender imbalance, collaborative filtering, feedback loops, fairness metrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review