Cited by 12Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Development of an explainable clinical decision support system for the prediction of patient quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Open access
Antoniadi, Anna Markella, Galvin, Miriam, Heverin, Mark, Hardiman, Orla, Mooney, Catherine·2021·Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Abstract

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a rare neurodegenerative and currently incurable disease. It causes a rapid decline in motor functions and has a fatal trajectory. The aim of the treatment is mostly to alleviate symptoms and improve the patient's quality of life (QoL). The goal of this study is to develop a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) in order to alert clinicians when a patient is at risk of experiencing a low QoL, so that they are better supported. The source of the data was the Irish ALS Registry and interviews with the 90 patients and their primary informal caregiver at three time-points. In this dataset, there were two different scores to measure a person's overall QoL, based on the McGill QoL (MQoL) Questionnaire and we worked towards the prediction of both. The method we used for the development of the predictive models was Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), which was compared to a logistic regression baseline model. We used the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values as a technique to provide local and global explanations to the outputs as well as to select the most important features. The total calculated MQoL score was predicted accurately by three features, with a F1-score on the test set equal to 0.81, a recall score of 0.78, and a precision score of 0.84, while, the addition of two features produced similar outcomes (0.79, 0.70 and 0.90 respectively). The three most important features were the age at disease onset, ALSFRS score for orthopnoea and the caregiver's status pre-caregiving.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3412841.3441940

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (2001), 5-32.
  2. Jerome Friedman. 2001. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics 29 (10 2001), 1189-1232. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2699986 · DOI
  3. Sonja Körner, Katja Kollewe, Susanne Abdulla, Antonia Zapf, Reinhard Dengler, and Susanne Petri. 2015. Interaction of physical function, quality of life and depression in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: characterization of a large patient cohort. BMC neurology 15, 1 (2015), 1-8.
  4. Dorothée Lulé, Sonja Häcker, Albert Ludolph, Niels Birbaumer, and Andrea Kübler. 2008. Depression and quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 105, 23 (2008), 397.
  5. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 4765-4774. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/ 7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpreting-model-predictions.pdf
  6. Ursula Neumann, Nikita Genze, and Dominik Heider. 2017. EFS: an ensemble feature selection tool implemented as R-package and web-application. BioData mining 10, 1 (2017), 1-9.
  7. Lokesh C Wijesekera and P Nigel Leigh. 2009. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Orphanet journal of rare diseases 4, 1 (2009), 3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antoniadi, A. M., Galvin, M., Heverin, M., Hardiman, O., & Mooney, C.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-03-22
Pages
594-602
OpenAlex
W3157158784
Cited by
12
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
12.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (16/RC/3948)
  • Irish Health Research Board (HRB) (ICE/2012/6 and HRB-JPND/2013/1)
  • American ALS Association (17 CM-324)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, quality of life prediction, clinical decision support systems, explainable AI, SHAP, XGBoost, ALSFRS, caregiver status, age of onset, orthopnea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review