CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge graphs

Gutierrez, Claudio, Sequeda, Juan F.·2021·Communications of the ACM
DOI 10.1145/3418294
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Tracking the historical events that lead to the interweaving of data and knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3418294

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many comprehensive survey papers exist for knowledge graphs generally and for domain-specific knowledge graphs such as smart grids, industrial products, manufacturing and production, biomedical domain, and recommendation engines.

    “In the literature, many comprehensive survey papers for knowledge graph [1], domain-specific knowledge graphs such as smart grids [2], industrial products [3], manufacturing and production [4] biomedical domain [5] and knowledge graphs with recommendation engines [6] exist”

    From Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

  • No survey paper focuses on the concept of knowledge graphs in the scholarly domain.

    “In the literature, many comprehensive survey papers for knowledge graph [1], domain-specific knowledge graphs such as smart grids [2], industrial products [3], manufacturing and production [4] biomedical domain [5] and knowledge graphs with recommendation engines [6] exist, whereas no survey paper focuses on concept of knowledge graphs in scholarly domain.”

    From Scholarly knowledge graphs through structuring scholarly communication: a review (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

    The citation [1] appears beside the sentence’s discussion of general knowledge-graph surveys, not beside its assertion that no survey covers the scholarly domain. The retrieved passages from the Supplemental Material for Knowledge Graphs Introduction list related works but do not assess whether a scholarly-domain survey exists (searched: scholarly domain, survey paper, scientific literature). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.5555/645502.656102 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/MAHC.2009.110 · DOI
  3. Berners-Lee, T., James Hendler, J. and Ora Lassila, O. The Semantic Web. Sci. Amer. 5 (May 2001), 34--43.
  4. Brachman, R.J and Levesque, H.J. The tractability of subsumption in frame-based description languages. In Proceedings of the Nat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence. (Austin, TX, USA, Aug. 6--10, 1984), 34--37.
  5. 10.1109/69.43410 · DOI
  6. 10.5555/773249 · DOI
  7. Cruz, I.F, Mendelzon, A.O. and Wood, P.T A graphical query language supporting recursion. SIGMOD, 1987, 323--330.
  8. 10.1016/0004-3702(77)90003-0 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/comjnl/1.1.36 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0004-3702(82)90020-0 · DOI
  11. Gallaire, H. and Minker, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Symposium on Logic and Data Bases, Centre d'études et de recherches de Toulouse, France, 1977.
  12. Green, C.C. and Raphael, B. The use of theorem-proving techniques in question-answering systems. In Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conf., 169--181.
  13. 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1066 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/MIS.2009.36 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/42411.42414 · DOI
  17. Patrick J. Hayes. 1977. In Defense of Logic. In IJCAI. 559--565.
  18. James, P. Knowledge graphs. Number 945 in Memorandum Faculty of Applied Mathematics. University of Twente, Faculty of Applied Mathematics, 1991.
  19. 10.1145/210332.210335 · DOI
  20. Kowalski, R.A. Predicate logic as programming language. In Proceedings of the 6th IFIP Congress on Information Processing, 1974, 569--574.
  21. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G.E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of NIPS.
  22. Lenzerini, M. Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of PODS '02, 233--246.
  23. Mendelzon, A.O. and Milo, T. Formal models of Web queries. In Proceedings of PODS '97, 134--143.
  24. 10.1145/3331166 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/bs.3830120511 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0743-1066(94)00039-9 · DOI
  27. B. Raphael, B. SIR: A Computer Program for Semantic Information Retrieval. Technical Report, 1964, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  28. Richens, R.H. Preprogramming for mechanical translation. Mechanical Translation 3, 1 (1956), 20--25.
  29. 10.1145/321250.321253 · DOI
  30. Shapiro, S.C. 1971. A net structure for semantic information storage, deduction and retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2nd Intern. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence. (London, U.K., Sept. 1--3, 1971), 512--523.
  31. 10.1145/96602.96604 · DOI
  32. 10.1147/rd.204.0336 · DOI
  33. Tsur, S. and Zaniolo, C. LDL: A logic-based data language. In Proceedings of the 12th Intern. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 1986, 33--41.
  34. 10.1017/S0269888900007797 · DOI
  35. 10.1145/210376.210390 · DOI
  36. Woods W. What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. 76 (Nov. 1975) 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50014-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gutierrez, C., & Sequeda, J. F.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Published
2021-02-22
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
96-104
ISSN
  • 0001-0782
  • 1557-7317
DOI
10.1145/3418294
Cited by
148
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review