Cited by 7,753Semantic Web and OntologiesBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesLibrary Science and Information Systems

Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?

Open access
Gruber, Thomas R.·1995·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Abstract

Recent work in Artificial Intelligence (AI) is exploring the use of formal ontologies as a way of specifying content-specific agreements for the sharing and reuse of knowledge among software entities. We take an engineering perspective on the development of such ontologies. Formal ontologies are viewed as designed artifacts, formulated for specific purposes and evaluated against objective design criteria. We describe the role of ontologies in supporting knowledge sharing activities, and then present a set of criteria to guide the development of ontologies for these purposes. We show how these criteria are applied in case studies from the design of ontologies for engineering mathematics and bibliographic data. Selected design decisions are discussed, and alternative representation choices are evaluated against the design criteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CAIM uses an ontology as a formal specification to provide a consistent scope for categorizing and relating memories via tags, thereby supporting reliable memory retrieval across interactions.

    “CAIM uses an ontology as a formal specification to provide a consistent scope for categorizing and relating memories via tags, thereby supporting reliable memory retrieval across interactions [19].”
  • There is a notable relation between multiscale hierarchies and biological ontologies, in which a biological entity or concept is recursively factored into a set of subconcepts, sub-subconcepts, and so on.

    “There is a notable relation of the multiscale hierarchies described above and biological ontologies, in which a biological entity or concept is recursively factored into a set of subconcepts, sub-subconcepts, and so on (Gruber, 1995).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Gruber, 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruber, T. R.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Gruber, Thomas R.
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
43
Issue
5-6
Pages
907-928
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133109597
Cited by
7,753
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 181 · 2022: 208 · 2021: 250 · 2020: 289 · 2019: 303 · 2018: 255 · 2017: 277 · 2016: 295 · 2015: 389 · 2014: 399 · 2013: 412 · 2012: 460
FWCI
60.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
Keywords
formal ontology, ontology design, knowledge sharing, knowledge reuse, design criteria, engineering mathematics, bibliographic data, ontology representation, software entities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review