Online Post-Processing in Rankings for Fair Utility Maximization
Abstract
We consider the problem of utility maximization in online ranking applications while also satisfying a pre-defined fairness constraint. We consider batches of items which arrive over time, already ranked using an existing ranking model. We propose online post-processing for re-ranking these batches to enforce adherence to the pre-defined fairness constraint, while maximizing a specific notion of utility. To achieve this goal, we propose two deterministic re-ranking policies. In addition, we learn a re-ranking policy based on a novel variation of learning to search. Extensive experiments on real world and synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed policies both in terms of adherence to the fairness constraint and utility maximization. Furthermore, our analysis shows that the performance of the proposed policies depends on the original data distribution w.r.t the fairness constraint and the notion of utility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lack of system owner fairness can lead to position and inductive biases.
“A lack of o-fairness can lead to position and inductive biases [42-46].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Cites
Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations
Kay, M., Matuszek, C., & Munson, S. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702520 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media
Kulshrestha, J., Eslami, M., Messias, J., Zafar, M. B., Ghosh, S., Gummadi, K. P., & Karahalios, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998321 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Quantifying the Impact of User Attentionon Fair Group Representation in Ranked Lists
Sapiezynski, P., Zeng, W., E Robertson, R., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2019) · Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308560.3317595 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651
- Authors
- Gupta, A., Johnson, E., Payan, J., Roy, A. K., Kobren, A., Panda, S., Tristan, J.-B., & Wick, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Oracle (United States) (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-03-08
- Pages
- 454-462
- OpenAlex
- W3116852239
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- fairness constraints, utility maximization, re-ranking, data distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review