Cited by 9Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMisinformation and Its Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Latent Pattern Sensing: Deepfake Video Detection via Predictive Representation Learning

Abstract

Increasingly advanced deepfake approaches have made the detection of deepfake videos very challenging. We observe that the general deepfake videos often exhibit appearance-level temporal inconsistencies in some facial components between frames, resulting in discriminable spatiotemporal latent patterns among semantic-level feature maps. Inspired by this finding, we propose a predictive representative learning approach termed Latent Pattern Sensing to capture these semantic change characteristics for deepfake video detection. The approach cascades a CNN-based encoder, a ConvGRU-based aggregator and a single-layer binary classifier. The encoder and aggregator are pre-trained in a self-supervised manner to form the representative spatiotemporal context features. Finally, the classifier is trained to classify the context features, distinguishing fake videos from real ones. In this manner, the extracted features can simultaneously describe the latent patterns of videos across frames spatially and temporally in a unified way, leading to an effective deepfake video detector. Extensive experiments prove our approach’s effectiveness, e.g., surpassing 10 state-of-the-arts at least 7.92%@AUC on challenging Celeb-DF(v2) benchmark.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3469877.3490586

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Latent pattern detection, audiovisual correlation-based self-supervised learning, and noise-based methods represent complementary strategies that emphasize fine-grained temporal anomalies and statistical anomalies between authentic and manipulated content.

    “Furthermore, latent pattern detection [66], audiovisual correlation-based self-supervised learning [67], and noise-based methods [77], [78] represent complementary strategies that emphasize fine-grained temporal anomalies and statistical anomalies between authentic and manipulated content.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. D. Afchar V. Nozick J. Yamagishi and I. Echizen. 2018. MesoNet: A compact facial video forgery detection network. In BTAS. 1–7. D. Afchar V. Nozick J. Yamagishi and I. Echizen. 2018. MesoNet: A compact facial video forgery detection network. In BTAS. 1–7. · DOI · Paper page
  2. R. Arandjelovic P. Gronat A. Torii T. Pajdla and J. Sivic. 2016. NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognition. In CVPR. 5297–5307. R. Arandjelovic P. Gronat A. Torii T. Pajdla and J. Sivic. 2016. NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognition. In CVPR. 5297–5307. · DOI
  3. N. Ballas L. Yao C. Pal and A. Courville. 2016. Delving deeper into convolutional networks for learning video representations. In ICLR. N. Ballas L. Yao C. Pal and A. Courville. 2016. Delving deeper into convolutional networks for learning video representations. In ICLR.
  4. 10.5555/184656.180369 · DOI
  5. S. Das , S. Seferbekov , A. Datta , M. Islam , and M Amin . 2021. Towards solving the deepfake problem : An analysis on improving deepfake detection using dynamic face augmentation. arXiv:2102.09603 ( 2021 ). S. Das, S. Seferbekov, A. Datta, M. Islam, and M Amin. 2021. Towards solving the deepfake problem : An analysis on improving deepfake detection using dynamic face augmentation. arXiv:2102.09603 (2021). · arXiv
  6. E. Denton and V. Birodkar. 2017. Unsupervised learning of disentangled representations from video. In NeurIPS Vol. 30. 1–10. E. Denton and V. Birodkar. 2017. Unsupervised learning of disentangled representations from video. In NeurIPS Vol. 30. 1–10.
  7. B. Dolhansky R. Howes B. Pflaum N. Baram and C. Canton-Ferrer. 2019. The deepfake detection challenge (DFDC) preview dataset. arXiv: 1910.08854 (2019). B. Dolhansky R. Howes B. Pflaum N. Baram and C. Canton-Ferrer. 2019. The deepfake detection challenge (DFDC) preview dataset. arXiv: 1910.08854 (2019). · arXiv
  8. J. Franceschi E. Delasalles M. Chen S. Lamprier and P. Gallinari. 2020. Stochastic latent residual video prediction. In ICML. 3233–3246. J. Franceschi E. Delasalles M. Chen S. Lamprier and P. Gallinari. 2020. Stochastic latent residual video prediction. In ICML. 3233–3246.
  9. I. Goodfellow J. Pouget-Abadie M. Mirza B. Xu D. Warde-Farley S. Ozair A. Courville and Y. Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS. 2672–2680. I. Goodfellow J. Pouget-Abadie M. Mirza B. Xu D. Warde-Farley S. Ozair A. Courville and Y. Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS. 2672–2680.
  10. D. Güera and E. Delp. 2018. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks. In AVSS. 1–6. D. Güera and E. Delp. 2018. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks. In AVSS. 1–6. · DOI · Paper page
  11. T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2019. Video representation learning by dense predictive coding. In ICCVW. 1–10. T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2019. Video representation learning by dense predictive coding. In ICCVW. 1–10. · DOI
  12. T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2020. Memory-Augmented Dense Predictive Coding for Video Representation Learning. In ECCV. 312–329. T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2020. Memory-Augmented Dense Predictive Coding for Video Representation Learning. In ECCV. 312–329. · DOI
  13. J. Hernandez-Ortega R. Tolosana J. Fiérrez and A. Morales. 2021. DeepFakesON-Phys: Deepfakes detection based on heart rate estimation. In AAAIW Vol. 2808. J. Hernandez-Ortega R. Tolosana J. Fiérrez and A. Morales. 2021. DeepFakesON-Phys: Deepfakes detection based on heart rate estimation. In AAAIW Vol. 2808. · DOI
  14. S. Khan A. Artusi and H. Dai. 2021. Adversarially robust deepfake media detection using fused convolutional neural network predictions. arXiv:2102.05950 (2021). S. Khan A. Artusi and H. Dai. 2021. Adversarially robust deepfake media detection using fused convolutional neural network predictions. arXiv:2102.05950 (2021). · arXiv
  15. M. Kim S. Tariq and S. Woo. 2021. FReTAL: Generalizing deepfake detection using knowledge distillation and representation learning. In CVPRW. 1001–1012. M. Kim S. Tariq and S. Woo. 2021. FReTAL: Generalizing deepfake detection using knowledge distillation and representation learning. In CVPRW. 1001–1012. · DOI · Paper page
  16. D. Kingma and J. Ba . 2015 . Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR. D. Kingma and J. Ba. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR.
  17. L. Li J. Bao H. Yang D. Chen and F. Wen. 2020. Advancing high fidelity identity swapping for forgery detection. In CVPR. 5074–5083. L. Li J. Bao H. Yang D. Chen and F. Wen. 2020. Advancing high fidelity identity swapping for forgery detection. In CVPR. 5074–5083. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Y. Li X. Yang P. Sun H. Qi and S. Lyu. 2019. Celeb-DF (v2): A new dataset for deepfake forensics. arXiv:1909.12962 (2019). Y. Li X. Yang P. Sun H. Qi and S. Lyu. 2019. Celeb-DF (v2): A new dataset for deepfake forensics. arXiv:1909.12962 (2019). · arXiv
  19. R Liang T. Li L. Li J. Wang and Q. Zhang. 2020. Knowledge consistency between neural networks and beyond. In ICLR. R Liang T. Li L. Li J. Wang and Q. Zhang. 2020. Knowledge consistency between neural networks and beyond. In ICLR.
  20. W Lotter G. Kreiman and D. Cox. 2017. Deep predictive coding networks for video prediction and unsupervised learning. In ICLR. W Lotter G. Kreiman and D. Cox. 2017. Deep predictive coding networks for video prediction and unsupervised learning. In ICLR.
  21. Y. Luo Y. Zhang J. Yan and W. Liu. 2021. Generalizing face forgery detection with high-frequency features. In CVPR. 16317–16326. Y. Luo Y. Zhang J. Yan and W. Liu. 2021. Generalizing face forgery detection with high-frequency features. In CVPR. 16317–16326. · DOI · Paper page
  22. F. Matern C. Riess and M. Stamminger. 2019. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. In WACVW. 83–92. F. Matern C. Riess and M. Stamminger. 2019. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. In WACVW. 83–92. · DOI · Paper page
  23. H. Nguyen , F. Fang , J. Yamagishi , and I. Echizen . 2019. Multi-task learning for detecting and segmenting manipulated facial images and videos . In International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems. 1–8. H. Nguyen, F. Fang, J. Yamagishi, and I. Echizen. 2019. Multi-task learning for detecting and segmenting manipulated facial images and videos. In International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems. 1–8.
  24. O. M. Parkhi A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman. 2015. Deep face recognition. In BMVC. Article 41 12 pages. O. M. Parkhi A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman. 2015. Deep face recognition. In BMVC. Article 41 12 pages. · DOI · Paper page
  25. A. Rossler D. Cozzolino L. Verdoliva C. Riess J. Thies and M. Nießner. 2019. FaceForensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In ICCV. 1–11. A. Rossler D. Cozzolino L. Verdoliva C. Riess J. Thies and M. Nießner. 2019. FaceForensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In ICCV. 1–11. · DOI · Paper page
  26. F. Schroff D. Kalenichenko and J. Philbin. 2015. FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In CVPR. 815–823. F. Schroff D. Kalenichenko and J. Philbin. 2015. FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In CVPR. 815–823. · DOI · Paper page
  27. C. Sun F. Baradel K. Murphy and C. Schmid. 2019. Learning video representations using contrastive bidirectional transformer. arXiv:1906.05743 (2019). C. Sun F. Baradel K. Murphy and C. Schmid. 2019. Learning video representations using contrastive bidirectional transformer. arXiv:1906.05743 (2019). · arXiv
  28. Z. Sun Y. Han Z. Hua N. Ruan and W. Jia. 2021. Improving the efficiency and robustness of deepfakes detection through precise geometric features. In CVPR. 3609–3618. Z. Sun Y. Han Z. Hua N. Ruan and W. Jia. 2021. Improving the efficiency and robustness of deepfakes detection through precise geometric features. In CVPR. 3609–3618. · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1145/3306346.3323035 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/2816795.2818056 · DOI
  31. J. Thies M. Zollhofer M. Stamminger C. Theobalt and M. Nießner. 2016. Face2face: Real-time face capture and reenactment of rgb videos. In ICCV. 2387–2395. J. Thies M. Zollhofer M. Stamminger C. Theobalt and M. Nießner. 2016. Face2face: Real-time face capture and reenactment of rgb videos. In ICCV. 2387–2395. · DOI · Paper page
  32. S. Tulyakov M. Liu X. Yang and J. Kautz. 2018. MoCoGAN: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In ICCV. 1526–1535. S. Tulyakov M. Liu X. Yang and J. Kautz. 2018. MoCoGAN: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In ICCV. 1526–1535. · DOI · Paper page
  33. L. Van der Maaten and G. Hinton . 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE . Journal of Machine Learning Research 9 , 11 ( 2008 ), 2579–2605. L. Van der Maaten and G. Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 11 (2008), 2579–2605.
  34. J. Wang Y. Liu Y. Hu H. Shi and T. Mei. 2021. FaceX-Zoo: A pytorch toolbox for face recognition. arXiv:2101.04407 (2021). J. Wang Y. Liu Y. Hu H. Shi and T. Mei. 2021. FaceX-Zoo: A pytorch toolbox for face recognition. arXiv:2101.04407 (2021). · DOI
  35. Y. Wang and Antitza D.2020. A video is worth more than 1000 lies. Comparing 3DCNN approaches for detecting deepfakes. In FG. 515–519. Y. Wang and Antitza D.2020. A video is worth more than 1000 lies. Comparing 3DCNN approaches for detecting deepfakes. In FG. 515–519. · DOI
  36. C. Yeh H. Chen S. Tsai and S. Wang. 2020. Disrupting image-translation-based deepfake algorithms with adversarial attacks. In WACVW. 53–62. C. Yeh H. Chen S. Tsai and S. Wang. 2020. Disrupting image-translation-based deepfake algorithms with adversarial attacks. In WACVW. 53–62. · DOI
  37. D. Zhang C. Li F. Lin D. Zeng and S. Ge. 2021. Detecting deepfake videos with temporal dropout 3DCNN. In IJCAI. 565–573. D. Zhang C. Li F. Lin D. Zeng and S. Ge. 2021. Detecting deepfake videos with temporal dropout 3DCNN. In IJCAI. 565–573. · DOI · Paper page
  38. H. Zhao W. Zhou D. Chen T. Wei W. Zhang and N. Yu. 2021. Multi-attentional deepfake detection. In CVPR. 2185–2194. H. Zhao W. Zhou D. Chen T. Wei W. Zhang and N. Yu. 2021. Multi-attentional deepfake detection. In CVPR. 2185–2194. · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1145/3394171.3413769 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ge, S., Lin, F., Li, C., Zhang, D., Tan, J., Wang, W., & Zeng, D.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Shanghai University (CN)
Venue
ACM Multimedia Asia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-12
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W4205809552
Cited by
9
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Multimedia in Asia (MMAsia) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Plan (2020AAA0140001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake video detection, time inconsistency, facial appearance, ConvGRU, self-supervised representation learning, Celeb-DF

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review