The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Latent Pattern Sensing: Deepfake Video Detection via Predictive Representation Learning
Abstract
Increasingly advanced deepfake approaches have made the detection of deepfake videos very challenging. We observe that the general deepfake videos often exhibit appearance-level temporal inconsistencies in some facial components between frames, resulting in discriminable spatiotemporal latent patterns among semantic-level feature maps. Inspired by this finding, we propose a predictive representative learning approach termed Latent Pattern Sensing to capture these semantic change characteristics for deepfake video detection. The approach cascades a CNN-based encoder, a ConvGRU-based aggregator and a single-layer binary classifier. The encoder and aggregator are pre-trained in a self-supervised manner to form the representative spatiotemporal context features. Finally, the classifier is trained to classify the context features, distinguishing fake videos from real ones. In this manner, the extracted features can simultaneously describe the latent patterns of videos across frames spatially and temporally in a unified way, leading to an effective deepfake video detector. Extensive experiments prove our approach’s effectiveness, e.g., surpassing 10 state-of-the-arts at least 7.92%@AUC on challenging Celeb-DF(v2) benchmark.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Latent pattern detection, audiovisual correlation-based self-supervised learning, and noise-based methods represent complementary strategies that emphasize fine-grained temporal anomalies and statistical anomalies between authentic and manipulated content.
“Furthermore, latent pattern detection [66], audiovisual correlation-based self-supervised learning [67], and noise-based methods [77], [78] represent complementary strategies that emphasize fine-grained temporal anomalies and statistical anomalies between authentic and manipulated content.”
From Evolving from Single-modal to Multi-modal Facial Deepfake Detection: Progress and Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Deepfakes and beyond: A Survey of face manipulation and fake detection
Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 · Cited by 1,237
Video Rewrite: driving visual speech with audio
Bregler, C., Covell, M., & Slaney, M. (1997) · Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '97 · doi:10.1145/258734.258880 · Cited by 669
Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domain
Liu, H., Li, X., Zhou, W., Chen, Y., He, Y., Xue, H., Zhang, W., & Yu, N. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00083 · Cited by 600
Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detection
Haliassos, A., Vougioukas, K., Petridis, S., & Pantic, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00500 · Cited by 537
Emotions Don't Lie: An Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Method using Affective Cues
Mittal, T., Bhattacharya, U., Chandra, R., Bera, A., & Manocha, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413570 · Cited by 319
Face Forgery Detection by 3D Decomposition
Zhu, X., Wang, H., Fei, H., Lei, Z., & Li, S. Z. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00295 · Cited by 106
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- D. Afchar V. Nozick J. Yamagishi and I. Echizen. 2018. MesoNet: A compact facial video forgery detection network. In BTAS. 1–7. D. Afchar V. Nozick J. Yamagishi and I. Echizen. 2018. MesoNet: A compact facial video forgery detection network. In BTAS. 1–7. · DOI · Paper page
- R. Arandjelovic P. Gronat A. Torii T. Pajdla and J. Sivic. 2016. NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognition. In CVPR. 5297–5307. R. Arandjelovic P. Gronat A. Torii T. Pajdla and J. Sivic. 2016. NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognition. In CVPR. 5297–5307. · DOI
- N. Ballas L. Yao C. Pal and A. Courville. 2016. Delving deeper into convolutional networks for learning video representations. In ICLR. N. Ballas L. Yao C. Pal and A. Courville. 2016. Delving deeper into convolutional networks for learning video representations. In ICLR.
- 10.5555/184656.180369 · DOI
- S. Das , S. Seferbekov , A. Datta , M. Islam , and M Amin . 2021. Towards solving the deepfake problem : An analysis on improving deepfake detection using dynamic face augmentation. arXiv:2102.09603 ( 2021 ). S. Das, S. Seferbekov, A. Datta, M. Islam, and M Amin. 2021. Towards solving the deepfake problem : An analysis on improving deepfake detection using dynamic face augmentation. arXiv:2102.09603 (2021). · arXiv
- E. Denton and V. Birodkar. 2017. Unsupervised learning of disentangled representations from video. In NeurIPS Vol. 30. 1–10. E. Denton and V. Birodkar. 2017. Unsupervised learning of disentangled representations from video. In NeurIPS Vol. 30. 1–10.
- B. Dolhansky R. Howes B. Pflaum N. Baram and C. Canton-Ferrer. 2019. The deepfake detection challenge (DFDC) preview dataset. arXiv: 1910.08854 (2019). B. Dolhansky R. Howes B. Pflaum N. Baram and C. Canton-Ferrer. 2019. The deepfake detection challenge (DFDC) preview dataset. arXiv: 1910.08854 (2019). · arXiv
- J. Franceschi E. Delasalles M. Chen S. Lamprier and P. Gallinari. 2020. Stochastic latent residual video prediction. In ICML. 3233–3246. J. Franceschi E. Delasalles M. Chen S. Lamprier and P. Gallinari. 2020. Stochastic latent residual video prediction. In ICML. 3233–3246.
- I. Goodfellow J. Pouget-Abadie M. Mirza B. Xu D. Warde-Farley S. Ozair A. Courville and Y. Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS. 2672–2680. I. Goodfellow J. Pouget-Abadie M. Mirza B. Xu D. Warde-Farley S. Ozair A. Courville and Y. Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In NeurIPS. 2672–2680.
- D. Güera and E. Delp. 2018. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks. In AVSS. 1–6. D. Güera and E. Delp. 2018. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks. In AVSS. 1–6. · DOI · Paper page
- T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2019. Video representation learning by dense predictive coding. In ICCVW. 1–10. T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2019. Video representation learning by dense predictive coding. In ICCVW. 1–10. · DOI
- T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2020. Memory-Augmented Dense Predictive Coding for Video Representation Learning. In ECCV. 312–329. T. Han W. Xie and A. Zisserman. 2020. Memory-Augmented Dense Predictive Coding for Video Representation Learning. In ECCV. 312–329. · DOI
- J. Hernandez-Ortega R. Tolosana J. Fiérrez and A. Morales. 2021. DeepFakesON-Phys: Deepfakes detection based on heart rate estimation. In AAAIW Vol. 2808. J. Hernandez-Ortega R. Tolosana J. Fiérrez and A. Morales. 2021. DeepFakesON-Phys: Deepfakes detection based on heart rate estimation. In AAAIW Vol. 2808. · DOI
- S. Khan A. Artusi and H. Dai. 2021. Adversarially robust deepfake media detection using fused convolutional neural network predictions. arXiv:2102.05950 (2021). S. Khan A. Artusi and H. Dai. 2021. Adversarially robust deepfake media detection using fused convolutional neural network predictions. arXiv:2102.05950 (2021). · arXiv
- M. Kim S. Tariq and S. Woo. 2021. FReTAL: Generalizing deepfake detection using knowledge distillation and representation learning. In CVPRW. 1001–1012. M. Kim S. Tariq and S. Woo. 2021. FReTAL: Generalizing deepfake detection using knowledge distillation and representation learning. In CVPRW. 1001–1012. · DOI · Paper page
- D. Kingma and J. Ba . 2015 . Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR. D. Kingma and J. Ba. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR.
- L. Li J. Bao H. Yang D. Chen and F. Wen. 2020. Advancing high fidelity identity swapping for forgery detection. In CVPR. 5074–5083. L. Li J. Bao H. Yang D. Chen and F. Wen. 2020. Advancing high fidelity identity swapping for forgery detection. In CVPR. 5074–5083. · DOI · Paper page
- Y. Li X. Yang P. Sun H. Qi and S. Lyu. 2019. Celeb-DF (v2): A new dataset for deepfake forensics. arXiv:1909.12962 (2019). Y. Li X. Yang P. Sun H. Qi and S. Lyu. 2019. Celeb-DF (v2): A new dataset for deepfake forensics. arXiv:1909.12962 (2019). · arXiv
- R Liang T. Li L. Li J. Wang and Q. Zhang. 2020. Knowledge consistency between neural networks and beyond. In ICLR. R Liang T. Li L. Li J. Wang and Q. Zhang. 2020. Knowledge consistency between neural networks and beyond. In ICLR.
- W Lotter G. Kreiman and D. Cox. 2017. Deep predictive coding networks for video prediction and unsupervised learning. In ICLR. W Lotter G. Kreiman and D. Cox. 2017. Deep predictive coding networks for video prediction and unsupervised learning. In ICLR.
- Y. Luo Y. Zhang J. Yan and W. Liu. 2021. Generalizing face forgery detection with high-frequency features. In CVPR. 16317–16326. Y. Luo Y. Zhang J. Yan and W. Liu. 2021. Generalizing face forgery detection with high-frequency features. In CVPR. 16317–16326. · DOI · Paper page
- F. Matern C. Riess and M. Stamminger. 2019. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. In WACVW. 83–92. F. Matern C. Riess and M. Stamminger. 2019. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations. In WACVW. 83–92. · DOI · Paper page
- H. Nguyen , F. Fang , J. Yamagishi , and I. Echizen . 2019. Multi-task learning for detecting and segmenting manipulated facial images and videos . In International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems. 1–8. H. Nguyen, F. Fang, J. Yamagishi, and I. Echizen. 2019. Multi-task learning for detecting and segmenting manipulated facial images and videos. In International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems. 1–8.
- O. M. Parkhi A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman. 2015. Deep face recognition. In BMVC. Article 41 12 pages. O. M. Parkhi A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman. 2015. Deep face recognition. In BMVC. Article 41 12 pages. · DOI · Paper page
- A. Rossler D. Cozzolino L. Verdoliva C. Riess J. Thies and M. Nießner. 2019. FaceForensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In ICCV. 1–11. A. Rossler D. Cozzolino L. Verdoliva C. Riess J. Thies and M. Nießner. 2019. FaceForensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In ICCV. 1–11. · DOI · Paper page
- F. Schroff D. Kalenichenko and J. Philbin. 2015. FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In CVPR. 815–823. F. Schroff D. Kalenichenko and J. Philbin. 2015. FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In CVPR. 815–823. · DOI · Paper page
- C. Sun F. Baradel K. Murphy and C. Schmid. 2019. Learning video representations using contrastive bidirectional transformer. arXiv:1906.05743 (2019). C. Sun F. Baradel K. Murphy and C. Schmid. 2019. Learning video representations using contrastive bidirectional transformer. arXiv:1906.05743 (2019). · arXiv
- Z. Sun Y. Han Z. Hua N. Ruan and W. Jia. 2021. Improving the efficiency and robustness of deepfakes detection through precise geometric features. In CVPR. 3609–3618. Z. Sun Y. Han Z. Hua N. Ruan and W. Jia. 2021. Improving the efficiency and robustness of deepfakes detection through precise geometric features. In CVPR. 3609–3618. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3306346.3323035 · DOI
- 10.1145/2816795.2818056 · DOI
- J. Thies M. Zollhofer M. Stamminger C. Theobalt and M. Nießner. 2016. Face2face: Real-time face capture and reenactment of rgb videos. In ICCV. 2387–2395. J. Thies M. Zollhofer M. Stamminger C. Theobalt and M. Nießner. 2016. Face2face: Real-time face capture and reenactment of rgb videos. In ICCV. 2387–2395. · DOI · Paper page
- S. Tulyakov M. Liu X. Yang and J. Kautz. 2018. MoCoGAN: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In ICCV. 1526–1535. S. Tulyakov M. Liu X. Yang and J. Kautz. 2018. MoCoGAN: Decomposing motion and content for video generation. In ICCV. 1526–1535. · DOI · Paper page
- L. Van der Maaten and G. Hinton . 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE . Journal of Machine Learning Research 9 , 11 ( 2008 ), 2579–2605. L. Van der Maaten and G. Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 11 (2008), 2579–2605.
- J. Wang Y. Liu Y. Hu H. Shi and T. Mei. 2021. FaceX-Zoo: A pytorch toolbox for face recognition. arXiv:2101.04407 (2021). J. Wang Y. Liu Y. Hu H. Shi and T. Mei. 2021. FaceX-Zoo: A pytorch toolbox for face recognition. arXiv:2101.04407 (2021). · DOI
- Y. Wang and Antitza D.2020. A video is worth more than 1000 lies. Comparing 3DCNN approaches for detecting deepfakes. In FG. 515–519. Y. Wang and Antitza D.2020. A video is worth more than 1000 lies. Comparing 3DCNN approaches for detecting deepfakes. In FG. 515–519. · DOI
- C. Yeh H. Chen S. Tsai and S. Wang. 2020. Disrupting image-translation-based deepfake algorithms with adversarial attacks. In WACVW. 53–62. C. Yeh H. Chen S. Tsai and S. Wang. 2020. Disrupting image-translation-based deepfake algorithms with adversarial attacks. In WACVW. 53–62. · DOI
- D. Zhang C. Li F. Lin D. Zeng and S. Ge. 2021. Detecting deepfake videos with temporal dropout 3DCNN. In IJCAI. 565–573. D. Zhang C. Li F. Lin D. Zeng and S. Ge. 2021. Detecting deepfake videos with temporal dropout 3DCNN. In IJCAI. 565–573. · DOI · Paper page
- H. Zhao W. Zhou D. Chen T. Wei W. Zhang and N. Yu. 2021. Multi-attentional deepfake detection. In CVPR. 2185–2194. H. Zhao W. Zhou D. Chen T. Wei W. Zhang and N. Yu. 2021. Multi-attentional deepfake detection. In CVPR. 2185–2194. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3394171.3413769 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolving from Single-modal to Multi-modal Facial Deepfake Detection: Progress and Challenges
Liu, P., Tao, Q., & Zhou, J. T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06965 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Ge, S., Lin, F., Li, C., Zhang, D., Tan, J., Wang, W., & Zeng, D.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Shanghai University (CN)
- Venue
- ACM Multimedia Asia
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2021-12
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W4205809552
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Multimedia in Asia (MMAsia) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Plan (2020AAA0140001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- deepfake video detection, time inconsistency, facial appearance, ConvGRU, self-supervised representation learning, Celeb-DF
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review