The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On-line unsupervised outlier detection using finite mixtures with discounting learning algorithms
Abstract
Outlier detection is a fundamental issue in data mining, speci cally in fraud detection, network intrusion detection, network monitoring, etc. SmartSifter, which we abbreviate as SS, is an outlier detection engine adrressing this problem from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory. This paper provides a theoretical basis for SS and empirically demonstrates its effectiveness. SS detects outliers in an online process through the on-line unsupervised learning of a probabilistic model (using a finite mixture model) of the information source. Each time a datum is input SS employs an on-line discounting learning algorithm to learn the probabilistic model. A score is given to the datum based on the learned model, with a high score indicating a high possibility of being a statistical outlier. The novel features of SS are: 1) it is adaptive to non-stationary sources of data; 2) a score has a clear statistical/information-theoretic meaning; 3) it is computationally inexpensive; and 4) it can handle both categorical and continuous variables. An experimental application to network intrusion detection shows that SS was able to identify data with high scores that corresponded to attacks, with low computational costs. Further experimental application has identified a number of meaningful rare cases in actual health insurance pathology data from Australia's Health Insurance Commission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
A View of the Em Algorithm that Justifies Incremental, Sparse, and other Variants
Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998) · Learning in Graphical Models · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12 · Cited by 2,187
Cited by
Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2008) · 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2008.17 · Cited by 6,601
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 · Cited by 1,649
Fast Outlier Detection in High Dimensional Spaces
Angiulli, F., & Pizzuti, C. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45681-3_2 · Cited by 836
Outlier Detection Using Replicator Neural Networks
Hawkins, S., He, H., Williams, G., & Baxter, R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46145-0_17 · Cited by 710
Self-citationChange-point detection in time-series data by relative density-ratio estimation
Liu, S., Yamada, M., Collier, N., & Sugiyama, M. (2013) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2013.01.012 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamanishi, K., Takeuchi, J.-I., Williams, G., & Milne, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2000-08
- Pages
- 320-324
- OpenAlex
- W2001245517
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On-line unsupervised outlier detection using finite mixtures with discounting learning algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/347090.347160
- The paper
- Yamanishi, K., Takeuchi, J.-I., Williams, G., & Milne, P. (2000). On-line unsupervised outlier detection using finite mixtures with discounting learning algorithms. Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/347090.347160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.