Fully Autonomous Vehicles for People with Visual Impairment: Policy, Accessibility, and Future Directions
Abstract
A significant number of individuals in the United States report a disability that limits their ability to travel, including many people who are blind or visually impaired (BVI). The implications of restricted transportation result in negative impacts related to economic security, physical and mental health, and overall quality of life. Fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs) present a means to mitigate travel barriers for this population by providing new, safe, and independent travel opportunities. However, current policies governing interactions with the artificial intelligence (AI) ‘at the wheel’ of FAVs do not reflect the accessibility needs articulated by BVI people in the extant literature, failing to encourage use cases that would result in life changing mobility. By reviewing the legislative and policy efforts surrounding FAVs, we argue that the heart of this problem is due to a disjointed, laissez-faire approach to FAV accessibility that has yet to actualize the full benefits of this new transportation mode, not only for BVI people, but also for all users. We outline the necessity for a policy framework that guides the design of FAVs to include the concerns of BVI people and then propose legislative and design recommendations aimed to promote enhanced accessibility, transparency, and fairness during FAV travel.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of accessibility focused BLV projects have primarily concerned the in-vehicle stage of AV travel.
“Although the majority of accessibility focused BLV projects have primarily concerned the in-vehicle stage of AV travel [2, 3, 7, 10, 12, 16, 17]”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
VAMs are uniquely positioned to develop the requisite cognitive maps for safely entering a vehicle and navigating to a seat on smartphones.
“For the tasks studied here (i.e., safely entering a vehicle and navigating to a seat), we posit that VAMs are uniquely positioned to develop the requisite cognitive maps to complete these tasks on a form factor (i.e., smartphones) known to be desirable and nearly ubiquitous among BLV users [12].”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review
Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., & Antoniou, C. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008 · Cited by 691 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These technological advances, combined with predictions that FAVs are expected to operate both as privately owned passenger vehicles and as a rideshare service [Narayanan et al. 2020], cast uncertainly as to whether the ADA, as it is currently constructed, will apply seamlessly to FAVs.”
BackgroundGiudice, N. A., Guenther, B. A., Jensen, N. A., & Haase, K. N. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00087 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Accessible Maps for the Future of Inclusive Ridesharing
Fink, P. D. S., Milne, H., Caccese, A., Alsamsam, M., Loranger, J., Colley, M., & Giudice, N. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications · doi:10.1145/3640792.3675736 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Despite the comparatively high rates of use, understanding the arrival behavior of rideshare vehicles is a real problem among people who are blind and low vision (BLV), with specific concerns related to when the vehicle will arrive, where it will arrive, and if it will arrive at all [6, 17, 25].”
Self-citationD. S. Fink, P., R Brown, J., M Movalia, R., J James, K., E Kastelein, M., Bond, J., E Andrulis, M., & A Giudice, N. (2026) · Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798714
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fink, P. D. S., Holz, J. A., & Giudice, N. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Maine (US)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
- Published
- 2021-08-19
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 1936-7228 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-7236
- OpenAlex
- W3196083467
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CHS-1910603)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- fully automated vehicles, visual impairment, blindness, accessibility, transport policy, legislation, mobility for people with disabilities, transparency and fairness, independent travel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review