Cited by 157Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruning

Wang, Junxiao, Guo, Song, Xie, Xin, Qi, Heng·2022·Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022

Abstract

We explore the problem of selectively forgetting categories from trained CNN classification models in federated learning (FL). Given that the data used for training cannot be accessed globally in FL, our insights probe deep into the internal influence of each channel. Through the visualization of feature maps activated by different channels, we observe that different channels have a varying contribution to different categories in image classification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3485447.3512222

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Model pruning schemes require far-reaching modifications of the existing architecture of the model in the unlearning process, which could affect the performance of the unlearned models.

    “Model pruning schemes require far-reaching modifications of the existing architecture of the model in the unlearning process [55, 56], which could affect the performance of the unlearned models.”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

  • Wang et al. [55] evaluate verifiability based on model accuracy.

    “Wang et al. [55] evaluate verifiability based on model accuracy.”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

  • In Wang et al.'s [55] scheme, the unlearned model is only available when the fined-tuned training process is complete.

    “Therefore, the unlearned model is only available when the fined-tuned training process is complete.”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

  • In Wang et al.'s [55] unlearning scheme, while the parameters associated with the class that needs to be unlearned are pruned, the parameters with other classes also become incomplete, which will affect the model performance.

    “In their unlearning scheme, however, while the parameters associated with the class that needs to be unlearned are pruned, the parameters with other classes also become incomplete, which will affect the model performance.”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

  • Wang et al. [55] regarded the output of a channel as a word and the feature map of a category as a document.

    “Similar to analyzing how relevant a word is to a document in a set of documents, they regarded the output of a channel as a word and the feature map of a category as a document.”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 157

Authors
Wang, J., Guo, S., Xie, X., & Qi, H.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-04-25
Pages
622-632
OpenAlex
W3209576002
Cited by
157
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 20
FWCI
17.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFB2102404)
  • Hong Kong RGC General Research Fund (152221/19E, 152203/20E, 152244/21E)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872310, 62072069, 61772112)
  • Hong Kong RGC Research Impact Fund (R5060-19)
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (R2020A045)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
federated unlearning, channel pruning, CNN classification, federated learning, feature map visualization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review