Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruning
Abstract
We explore the problem of selectively forgetting categories from trained CNN classification models in federated learning (FL). Given that the data used for training cannot be accessed globally in FL, our insights probe deep into the internal influence of each channel. Through the visualization of feature maps activated by different channels, we observe that different channels have a varying contribution to different categories in image classification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Model pruning schemes require far-reaching modifications of the existing architecture of the model in the unlearning process, which could affect the performance of the unlearned models.
“Model pruning schemes require far-reaching modifications of the existing architecture of the model in the unlearning process [55, 56], which could affect the performance of the unlearned models.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Wang et al. [55] evaluate verifiability based on model accuracy.
“Wang et al. [55] evaluate verifiability based on model accuracy.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
In Wang et al.'s [55] scheme, the unlearned model is only available when the fined-tuned training process is complete.
“Therefore, the unlearned model is only available when the fined-tuned training process is complete.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
In Wang et al.'s [55] unlearning scheme, while the parameters associated with the class that needs to be unlearned are pruned, the parameters with other classes also become incomplete, which will affect the model performance.
“In their unlearning scheme, however, while the parameters associated with the class that needs to be unlearned are pruned, the parameters with other classes also become incomplete, which will affect the model performance.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Wang et al. [55] regarded the output of a channel as a word and the feature map of a category as a document.
“Similar to analyzing how relevant a word is to a document in a set of documents, they regarded the output of a channel as a word and the feature map of a category as a document.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Wang et al. [55] provided an unlearning procedure via channel pruning [97], followed by a fine-tuning process to recover the performance of the pruned model.
“An unlearning procedure via channel pruning [97] was also provided, followed by a fine-tuning process to recover the performance of the pruned model.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Wang et al. [55] introduced the concept of term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) [96] to quantify the class discrimination of the channels.
“They introduced the concept of term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) [96] to quantify the class discrimination of the channels.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Wang et al. [55] analyzed the problem of selectively unlearning classes in a federated learning setting.
“Inspired by the observation that different channels have a varying contribution to different classes in trained CNN models, Wang et al. [55] analyzed the problem of selectively unlearning classes in a federated learning setting.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Channels with high TF-IDF scores have more discriminatory power in the target categories and thus need to be pruned.
“Channels with high TF-IDF scores have more discriminatory power in the target categories and thus need to be pruned.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Wang et al.'s [55] scheme pruned specific parameters in the original models, which will also reduce the accuracy of the model due to the lack of some model prediction information.
“Second, Wang et al.'s [55] scheme pruned specific parameters in the original models, which will also reduce the accuracy of the model due to the lack of some model prediction information.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 157
- Authors
- Wang, J., Guo, S., Xie, X., & Qi, H.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2022-04-25
- Pages
- 622-632
- OpenAlex
- W3209576002
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 20
- FWCI
- 17.28
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFB2102404)
- Hong Kong RGC General Research Fund (152221/19E, 152203/20E, 152244/21E)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872310, 62072069, 61772112)
- Hong Kong RGC Research Impact Fund (R5060-19)
- Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (R2020A045)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- federated unlearning, channel pruning, CNN classification, federated learning, feature map visualization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review