Cited by 121Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Few-Shot Object Detection: A Survey

Antonelli, Simone, Avola, Danilo, Cinque, Luigi, Crisostomi, Donato, Foresti, Gian Luca, Galasso, Fabio, Marini, Marco Raoul, Mecca, Alessio +1 more·2022·ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract

Deep learning approaches have recently raised the bar in many fields, from Natural Language Processing to Computer Vision, by leveraging large amounts of data. However, they could fail when the retrieved information is not enough to fit the vast number of parameters, frequently resulting in overfitting and therefore in poor generalizability. Few-Shot Learning aims at designing models that can effectively operate in a scarce data regime, yielding learning strategies that only need few supervised examples to be trained. These procedures are of both practical and theoretical importance, as they are crucial for many real-life scenarios in which data is either costly or even impossible to retrieve. Moreover, they bridge the distance between current data-hungry models and human-like generalization capability. Computer vision offers various tasks that can be few-shot inherent, such as person re-identification. This survey, which to the best of our knowledge is the first tackling this problem, is focused on Few-Shot Object Detection, which has received far less attention compared to Few-Shot Classification due to the intrinsic challenge level. In this regard, this review presents an extensive description of the approaches that have been tested in the current literature, discussing their pros and cons, and classifying them according to a rigorous taxonomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3519022

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonelli, S., Avola, D., Cinque, L., Crisostomi, D., Foresti, G. L., Galasso, F., Marini, M. R., Mecca, A., & Pannone, D.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2022-01-31
Volume
54
Issue
11s
Pages
1-37
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
OpenAlex
W4213450898
Cited by
121
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 7
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
few-shot object detection, few-shot learning, overfitting, data scarcity, person re-identification, generalization, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review