EANA: Reducing Privacy Risk on Large-scale Recommendation Models
Open accessAbstract
Embedding-based deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used in large-scale recommendation systems. Differentially-private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) provides a way to enable personalized experiences while preserving user privacy by injecting noise into every model parameter during the training process. However, it is challenging to apply DP-SGD to large-scale embedding-based DNNs due to its effect on training speed. This happens because the noise added by DP-SGD causes normally sparse gradients to become dense, introducing a large communication overhead between workers and parameter servers in a typical distributed training framework. This paper proposes embedding-aware noise addition (EANA) to mitigate the communication overhead, making training a large-scale embedding-based DNN possible. We examine the privacy benefit of EANA both analytically and empirically using secret sharer techniques. We demonstrate that training with EANA can achieve reasonable model precision while providing good practical privacy protection as measured by the secret sharer tests. Experiments on a real-world, large-scale dataset and model show that EANA is much faster than standard DP-SGD, improving the training speed by 54X and unblocking the training of a large-scale embedding-based DNN with reduced privacy risk.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This attack poses a threat to ML-based RS, as it highlights the extent of unintended rote learning by the RS model of its input data.
“This attack poses a threat to ML-based RS, as it highlights the extent of unintended rote learning by the RS model of its input data [101].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [101]
DP noise can be introduced at various stages: on the input data, the model parameters, or the final recommendations.
“This carefully calibrated noise can be introduced at various stages: on the input data [14, 124, 138, 172], the model parameters [101, 171, 173], or the final recommendations [172].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [101]
Laplace, Gaussian, and Exponential mechanisms are commonly applied for noise addition to satisfy DP.
“Usually, Laplace [14, 15, 171, 172, 176, 177], Gaussian [101, 123, 125] & Exponential [126] mechanisms are commonly applied for noise addition to satisfy the DP.”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [101]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RAH! RecSys–Assistant–Human: A Human-Centered Recommendation Framework With LLM Agents
Shu, Y., Zhang, H., Gu, H., Zhang, P., Lu, T., Li, D., & Gu, N. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3404039 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651
- Authors
- Ning, L., Chien, S., Song, S., Chen, M., Xue, Y., & Berlowitz, D.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2022-09-13
- Pages
- 399-407
- OpenAlex
- W4296604473
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- differential privacy, DP-SGD, communication overhead, distributed training, secret sharing, privacy-utility trade-off, training speed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review