Cited by 5Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataRecommender Systems and TechniquesStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

EANA: Reducing Privacy Risk on Large-scale Recommendation Models

Open access
Ning, Lin, Chien, Steve, Song, Shuang, Chen, Mei, Xue, Yunqi, Berlowitz, Devora·2022·Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

Abstract

Embedding-based deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used in large-scale recommendation systems. Differentially-private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) provides a way to enable personalized experiences while preserving user privacy by injecting noise into every model parameter during the training process. However, it is challenging to apply DP-SGD to large-scale embedding-based DNNs due to its effect on training speed. This happens because the noise added by DP-SGD causes normally sparse gradients to become dense, introducing a large communication overhead between workers and parameter servers in a typical distributed training framework. This paper proposes embedding-aware noise addition (EANA) to mitigate the communication overhead, making training a large-scale embedding-based DNN possible. We examine the privacy benefit of EANA both analytically and empirically using secret sharer techniques. We demonstrate that training with EANA can achieve reasonable model precision while providing good practical privacy protection as measured by the secret sharer tests. Experiments on a real-world, large-scale dataset and model show that EANA is much faster than standard DP-SGD, improving the training speed by 54X and unblocking the training of a large-scale embedding-based DNN with reduced privacy risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3523227.3546769

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ning, L., Chien, S., Song, S., Chen, M., Xue, Y., & Berlowitz, D.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-09-13
Pages
399-407
OpenAlex
W4296604473
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
differential privacy, DP-SGD, communication overhead, distributed training, secret sharing, privacy-utility trade-off, training speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review