Cited by 66Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

RAH! RecSys–Assistant–Human: A Human-Centered Recommendation Framework With LLM Agents

Open access
Shu, Yubo, Zhang, Haonan, Gu, Hansu, Zhang, Peng, Lu, Tun, Li, Dongsheng, Gu, Ning·2024·IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems

Abstract

The rapid evolution of the web has led to an exponential growth in content. Recommender systems play a crucial role in human–computer interaction (HCI) by tailoring content based on individual preferences. Despite their importance, challenges persist in balancing recommendation accuracy with user satisfaction, addressing biases while preserving user privacy, and solving cold-start problems in cross-domain situations. This research argues that addressing these issues is not solely the recommender systems’ responsibility, and a human-centered approach is vital. We introduce the recommender system, assistant, and human (RAH) framework, an innovative solution with large language model (LLM)-based agents such as perceive, learn, act, critic, and reflect, emphasizing the alignment with user personalities. The framework utilizes the learn-act-critic loop and a reflection mechanism for improving user alignment. Using the real-world data, our experiments demonstrate the RAH framework's efficacy in various recommendation domains, from reducing human burden to mitigating biases and enhancing user control. Notably, our contributions provide a human-centered recommendation framework that partners effectively with various recommendation models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcss.2024.3404039

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pre-trained knowledge and strong generalization capabilities of LLMs facilitate better knowledge transfer across domains, addressing cold-start with minimal additional training.

    “Furthermore, the pre-trained knowledge and strong generalization capabilities of LLMs facilitate better knowledge transfer across domains, addressing persistent challenges such as cold-start (Shu et al., 2024) with minimal additional training.”

    From A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025) · cites this paper as Shu et al., 2024

    Section 3.3 says the assistant extrapolates a learned user personality across domains, alleviating cold-start, and Section 5.1 reports that assistants can reason across domains. The paper does not establish that this works with minimal additional training; Section 5.2 describes training the recommendation models on substantial interaction data and assistant-generated feedback. Our copy gives no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 'Video Games' dataset has validated DRDT and RAH capabilities.

    “while the 'Video Games' dataset (2.8M users, 137.2K items) has validated DRDT (Wang et al., 2023b) and RAH (Shu et al., 2024) capabilities.”

    From A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025) · cites this paper as Shu et al., 2024

    Section 4 (Experiments Setting; page unavailable) says RAH was evaluated using Amazon Video Games data, and Section 5 reports its experimental results. But the paper describes filtered, cross-domain subsets, including Cross221k with 221,861 users; it does not establish that RAH was validated on a Video Games dataset of 2.8 million users and 137,200 items. DRDT is attributed to a separate citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Luke Friedman, Sameer Ahuja, David Allen, Terry Tan, Hakim Sidahmed, Changbo Long, Jun Xie, Gabriel Schubiner, Ajay Patel, Harsh Lara, et al. 2023. Leveraging Large Language Models in Conversational Recommender Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07961 (2023). · arXiv
  2. Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval. 639-648.
  3. Hoyeop Lee, Jinbae Im, Seongwon Jang, Hyunsouk Cho, and Sehee Chung. 2019. Melu: Meta-learned user preference estimator for cold-start recommendation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1073-1082.
  4. Qijiong Liu, Jieming Zhu, Quanyu Dai, and Xiaoming Wu. 2022. Boosting deep ctr prediction with a plug-and-play pre-trainer for news recommendation. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2823-2833.
  5. Ruibo Liu, Ruixin Yang, Chenyan Jia, Ge Zhang, Denny Zhou, Andrew M Dai, Diyi Yang, and Soroush Vosoughi. 2023. Training Socially Aligned Language Models in Simulated Human Society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16960 (2023). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shu, Y., Zhang, H., Gu, H., Zhang, P., Lu, T., Li, D., & Gu, N.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Seattle, WA, USA
  • Microsoft Research Asia, Shanghai, China
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Published
2024-10
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
6759-6770
ISSN
  • 2329-924X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-7476
OpenAlex
W4400033172
Cited by
66
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61932007, 62172106, 62372113)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
LLM agents, recommender systems, reflection mechanism, recommendation bias, user privacy, cold start, cross-domain recommendation, user control, human-computer interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review