CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Usability and User Interface DesignInteractive and Immersive DisplaysAugmented Reality Applications

AUIT – the Adaptive User Interfaces Toolkit for Designing XR Applications

Open access
Evangelista Belo, João Marcelo, Lystbæk, Mathias N., Feit, Anna Maria, Pfeuffer, Ken, Kán, Peter, Oulasvirta, Antti, Grønbæk, Kaj·2022·Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
DOI 10.1145/3526113.3545651
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Adaptive user interfaces can improve experiences in Extended Reality (XR) applications by adapting interface elements according to the user’s context. Although extensive work explores different adaptation policies, XR creators often struggle with their implementation, which involves laborious manual scripting. The few available tools are underdeveloped for realistic XR settings where it is often necessary to consider conflicting aspects that affect an adaptation. We fill this gap by presenting AUIT, a toolkit that facilitates the design of optimization-based adaptation policies. AUIT allows creators to flexibly combine policies that address common objectives in XR applications, such as element reachability, visibility, and consistency. Instead of using rules or scripts, specifying adaptation policies via adaptation objectives simplifies the design process and enables creative exploration of adaptations. After creators decide which adaptation objectives to use, a multi-objective solver finds appropriate adaptations in real-time. A study showed that AUIT allowed creators of XR applications to quickly and easily create high-quality adaptations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3526113.3545651

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • System adaptability can be beneficial to oversight if oversight persons can adapt the system's processes or its interface.

    “It can be beneficial to oversight if oversight persons can adapt the system's processes or its interface [25, 69].”

    From On the Quest for Effectiveness in Human Oversight: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    The D4 section says creators can customize when and why an XR interface adapts, and the Discussion reports benefits for creating adaptive interfaces. The paper identifies those creators as application developers or designers, not oversight personnel; it does not establish a benefit to oversight or address adapting system processes more broadly. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Khalil Amine. 2019. Multiobjective Simulated Annealing: Principles and Algo- rithm Variants. Advances in Operations Research 2019 (05 2019), 1-13. https: //doi.org/10.1155/2019/8134674 · DOI
  2. Narges Ashtari, Andrea Bunt, Joanna McGrenere, Michael Nebeling, and Parmit K. Chilana. 2020. Creating Augmented and Virtual Reality Applications: Current Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376722 · DOI
  3. Blaine Bell, Steven Feiner, and Tobias Höllerer. 2001. View Management for Virtual and Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Sym- posium on User Interface Software and Technology (Orlando, Florida) (UIST '01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 101-110. https: //doi.org/10.1145/502348.502363 · DOI
  4. Leonardo Bonanni, Chia-Hsun Lee, and Ted Selker. 2005. A Framework for Designing Intelligent Task-Oriented Augmented Reality User Interfaces. In Pro- ceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (San Diego, California, USA) (IUI '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 317-319. https://doi.org/10.1145/1040830.1040913 · DOI
  5. Amani Braham, F. Buendia, Maha Khemaja, and Faiez Gargouri. 2021. User interface design patterns and ontology models for adaptive mobile applications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (01 2021), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00779-020-01481-5 · DOI
  6. John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4-7.
  7. Kelly Caine. 2016. Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 981-992. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858498 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eduardo Castillejo, Aitor Almeida, and Diego López de Ipiña. 2014. Ontology- Based Model for Supporting Dynamic and Adaptive User Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 30, 10 (2014), 771-786. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10447318.2014.927287 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.927287 · DOI
  9. Yi Fei Cheng, Yukang Yan, Xin Yi, Yuanchun Shi, and David Lindlbauer. 2021. SemanticAdapt: Optimization-based Adaptation of Mixed Reality Layouts Lever- aging Virtual-Physical Semantic Connections (UIST '2021). Association for Com- puting Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474750 · DOI
  10. Tilman Deuschel and Ted Scully. 2016. On the Importance of Spatial Perception for the Design of Adaptive User Interfaces. In 2016 IEEE 10th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO). 70-79. https://doi.org/10. 1109/SASO.2016.13 · DOI
  11. Anind Dey, Gregory Abowd, and Daniel Salber. 2001. A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Appli- cations. Human-Computer Interaction 16 (04 2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327051HCI16234_02 · DOI
  12. Edsger W Dijkstra. 1982. On the role of scientifc thought. In Selected writings on computing: a personal perspective. Springer, 60-66.
  13. Andrew T. Duchowski, Krzysztof Krejtz, Izabela Krejtz, Cezary Biele, Anna Niedzielska, Peter Kiefer, Martin Raubal, and Ioannis Giannopoulos. 2018. The Index of Pupillary Activity: Measuring Cognitive Load <i>Vis-à-Vis</i> Task Difculty with Pupil Oscillation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173856 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Barrett Ens, Eyal Ofek, Neil Bruce, and Pourang Irani. 2015. Spatial Constancy of Surface-Embedded Layouts across Multiple Environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Los Angeles, California, USA) (SUI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1145/2788940.2788954 · DOI
  15. João Marcelo Evangelista Belo, Anna Maria Feit, Tiare Feuchtner, and Kaj Grøn- bæk. 2021. XRgonomics: Facilitating the Creation of Ergonomic 3D Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 290, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445349 · DOI
  16. Anna Maria Feit, Myroslav Bachynskyi, and Srinath Sridhar. 2015. Towards Multi-Objective Optimization for UI Design. (April 2015). http://annafeit.de/ resources/papers/Multiobjective_Optimization2015.pdf Presented at CHI 2015 Workshop on Principles, Techniques and Perspectives on Optimization and HCI.
  17. Anna Maria Feit, Lukas Vordemann, Seonwook Park, Caterina Berube, and Otmar Hilliges. 2020. Detecting Relevance during Decision-Making from Eye Movements for UI Adaptation. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Re- search and Applications (Stuttgart, Germany) (ETRA '20 Full Papers). Associ- ation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379155.3391321 · DOI
  18. Leah Findlater and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2009. Design space and evaluation chal- lenges of adaptive graphical user interfaces. AI Magazine 30, 4 (2009), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i4.2268 · DOI
  19. Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2008. Impact of Screen Size on Perfor- mance, Awareness, and User Satisfaction with Adaptive Graphical User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1247-1256. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357249 · DOI
  20. Krzysztof Gajos and Daniel S. Weld. 2004. SUPPLE: Automatically Generating User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Funchal, Madeira, Portugal) (IUI '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1145/964442.964461 · DOI
  21. Krzysztof Gajos and Daniel S. Weld. 2005. Preference Elicitation for Interface Opti- mization. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Soft- ware and Technology (Seattle, WA, USA) (UIST '05). Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1145/1095034.1095063 · DOI
  22. Ran Gal, Lior Shapira, Eyal Ofek, and Pushmeet Kohli. 2014. FLARE: Fast layout for augmented reality applications. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR. 2014.6948429 · DOI
  23. Georgia Gkioxari, Jitendra Malik, and Justin Johnson. 2019. Mesh R-CNN. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
  24. Camille Gobert, Kashyap Todi, Gilles Bailly, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2019. SAM: A Modular Framework for Self-Adapting Web Menus. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ray, California) (IUI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 481-484. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302314 · DOI
  25. Raphaël Grasset, Tobias Langlotz, Denis Kalkofen, Markus Tatzgern, and Di- eter Schmalstieg. 2012. Image-driven view management for augmented reality browsers. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402555 · DOI
  26. Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick. 2017. Mask R-CNN. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
  27. Otmar Hilliges, Christian Sandor, and Gudrun Klinker. 2006. Interactive Pro- totyping for Ubiquitous Augmented Reality User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Sydney, Australia) (IUI '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 285-287. https://doi.org/10.1145/1111449.1111512 · DOI
  28. Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, Xiang Guo, Paymahn Moghadasian, and Pourang Irani. 2014. Consumed Endurance: A Metric to Quantify Arm Fatigue of Mid-Air Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1063-1072. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288. 2557130 · DOI
  29. Tobias Hans Höllerer. 2004. User Interfaces for Mobile Augmented Reality Systems. Ph. D. Dissertation. Columbia University.
  30. Scott Kirkpatrick, C. Gelatt, and M. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science (New York, N.Y.) 220 (06 1983), 671-80. https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.220.4598.671 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Sarah Krings, Enes Yigitbas, Ivan Jovanovikj, Stefan Sauer, and Gregor Engels. 2020. Development Framework for Context-Aware Augmented Reality Appli- cations. In Companion Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on En- gineering Interactive Computing Systems (Sophia Antipolis, France) (EICS '20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393672.3398640 · DOI
  32. Wallace S. Lages and Doug A. Bowman. 2019. Walking with Adaptive Augmented Reality Workspaces: Design and Usage Patterns. In Proceedings of the 24th In- ternational Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ray, California) (IUI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302278 · DOI
  33. David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3173574.3173610 · DOI
  34. Germán Leiva, Jens Emil Grønbæk, Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, Cuong Nguyen, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, and Paul Asente. 2021. Rapido: Prototyping In- teractive AR Experiences through Programming by Demonstration. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Virtual Event, USA) (UIST '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 626-637. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474774 · DOI
  35. David Lindlbauer, Anna Maria Feit, and Otmar Hilliges. 2019. Context-aware online adaptation of mixed reality interfaces. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 147-160.
  36. Feiyu Lu, Shakiba Davari, Lee Lisle, Yuan Li, and Doug A Bowman. 2020. Glance- able ar: Evaluating information access methods for head-worn augmented reality. In 2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). IEEE, 930- 939.
  37. Feiyu Lu and Yan Xu. 2022. Exploring Spatial UI Transition Mechanisms with Head-Worn Augmented Reality. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22). ACM.
  38. Jacob Boesen Madsen, Markus Tatzqern, Claus B. Madsen, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Denis Kalkofen. 2016. Temporal Coherence Strategies for Augmented Reality Labeling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 4 (2016), 1415-1423. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2518318 · DOI
  39. R Timothy Marler and Jasbir S Arora. 2004. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization 26, 6 (2004), 369-395.
  40. Mahdi H. Miraz, Maaruf Ali, and Peter S. Excell. 2021. Adaptive user interfaces and universal usability through plasticity of user interface design. Computer Science Review 40 (2021), 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100363 · DOI · Paper page
  41. G. Mori, F. Paterno, and C. Santoro. 2004. Design and development of multide- vice user interfaces through multiple logical descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30, 8 (2004), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2004.40 · DOI
  42. Leon Müller, Ken Pfeufer, Jan Gugenheimer, Bastian Pfeging, Sarah Prange, and Florian Alt. 2021. SpatialProto: Exploring Real-World Motion Captures for Rapid Prototyping of Interactive Mixed Reality. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 363, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445560 · DOI
  43. Michael Nebeling, Katy Lewis, Yu-Cheng Chang, Lihan Zhu, Michelle Chung, Piaoyang Wang, and Janet Nebeling. 2020. XRDirector: A Role-Based Collab- orative Immersive Authoring System. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Confer- ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-12. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376637 · DOI
  44. Jefrey Nichols, Brad A. Myers, Michael Higgins, Joseph Hughes, Thomas K. Harris, Roni Rosenfeld, and Mathilde Pignol. 2002. Generating Remote Con- trol Interfaces for Complex Appliances. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Paris, France) (UIST '02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1145/571985.572008 · DOI
  45. Lauren Norrie and Roderick Murray-Smith. 2016. Investigating UI Displacements in an Adaptive Mobile Homescreen. 8, 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI. 2016070101.oa · DOI
  46. Benjamin Nuernberger, Eyal Ofek, Hrvoje Benko, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2016. SnapToReality: Aligning Augmented Reality to the Real World. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1233-1244. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2858036.2858250 · DOI
  47. Allan Oliveira and Regina B. Araujo. 2012. Creation and Visualization of Context Aware Augmented Reality Interfaces. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Capri Island, Italy) (AVI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 324-327. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2254556.2254618 · DOI
  48. Antti Oulasvirta, Niraj Ramesh Dayama, Morteza Shiripour, Maximilian John, and Andreas Karrenbauer. 2020. Combinatorial Optimization of Graphical User Interface Designs. Proc. IEEE 108, 3 (2020), 434-464. https://doi.org/10.1109/ JPROC.2020.2969687 · DOI
  49. Seonwook Park, Christoph Gebhardt, Roman Rädle, Anna Feit, Hana Vrza- kova, Niraj Dayama, Hui-Shyong Yeo, Clemens Klokmose, Aaron Quigley, Antti Oulasvirta, and Otmar Hilliges. 2018. AdaM: Adapting Multi-User Interfaces for Collaborative Environments in Real-Time. In SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA.
  50. Fabio Paterno, Carmen Santoro, and Lucio Davide Spano. 2009. MARIA: A Universal, Declarative, Multiple Abstraction-Level Language for Service-Oriented Applications in Ubiquitous Environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, 4, Article 19 (nov 2009), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1614390.1614394 · DOI
  51. Ken Pfeufer, Yasmeen Abdrabou, Augusto Esteves, Radiah Rivu, Yomna Ab- delrahman, Stefanie Meitner, Amr Saadi, and Florian Alt. 2021. ARtention: A design space for gaze-adaptive user interfaces in augmented reality. Computers & Graphics 95 (2021), 1-12.
  52. Xavier Puig, Kevin Ra, Marko Boben, Jiaman Li, Tingwu Wang, Sanja Fidler, and Antonio Torralba. 2018. VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
  53. Scott D Roth. 1982. Ray casting for modeling solids. Computer graphics and image processing 18, 2 (1982), 109-144.
  54. Paulo Salem. 2017. User Interface Optimization Using Genetic Programming with an Application to Landing Pages. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, EICS, Article 13 (June 2017), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3099583 · DOI
  55. Christian Sandor and Gudrun Klinker. 2005. A Rapid Prototyping Software Infrastructure for User Interfaces in Ubiquitous Augmented Reality. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 9, 3 (2005), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004- 0328-1 · DOI
  56. Ryo Suzuki, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Li-Yi Wei, Stephen DiVerdi, Wilmot Li, and Daniel Leithinger. 2020. RealitySketch: Embedding Responsive Graphics and Visualizations in AR with Dynamic Sketching. In Adjunct Publication of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Virtual Event, USA) (UIST '20 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379350.3416155 · DOI
  57. Markus Tatzgern, Denis Kalkofen, Raphael Grasset, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2014. Hedgehog labeling: View management techniques for external labels in 3D space. In 2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2014.6802046 · DOI
  58. Markus Tatzgern, Valeria Orso, Denis Kalkofen, Giulio Jacucci, Luciano Gam- berini, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2016. Adaptive information density for augmented reality displays. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality, VR 2016, Greenville, SC, USA, March 19-23, 2016, Tobias Höllerer, Victoria Interrante, Anatole Lécuyer, and Evan A. Suma (Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016. 7504691 · DOI
  59. Kashyap Todi, Gilles Bailly, Luis Leiva, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2021. Adapting User Interfaces with Model-Based Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 573, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445497 · DOI
  60. V. Černý. 1985. Thermodynamical Approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem: An Efcient Simulation Algorithm. 45, 1 (Jan. 1985), 41-51. https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF00940812 · DOI
  61. Robert Xiao, Scott Hudson, and Chris Harrison. 2017. Supporting Responsive Cohabitation Between Virtual Interfaces and Physical Objects on Everyday Sur- faces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, EICS, Article 12 (jun 2017), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3095814 · DOI
  62. Robert Xiao, Julia Schwarz, Nick Throm, Andrew D. Wilson, and Hrvoje Benko. 2018. MRTouch: Adding Touch Input to Head-Mounted Mixed Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 4 (2018), 1653-1660. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794222 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evangelista Belo, J. M., Lystbæk, M. N., Feit, A. M., Pfeuffer, K., Kán, P., Oulasvirta, A., & Grønbæk, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • Aalto University (FI)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-10-28
Pages
1-16
DOI
10.1145/3526113.3545651
OpenAlex
W4307475996
Cited by
117
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12
FWCI
21.40
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Innovation Fund Denmark (6151-00006B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
Keywords
adaptive user interfaces, extended reality, adaptation policy, multi-objective optimization, real-time adaptation, visibility, consistency, user context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review