Cited by 217Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

CLIPasso: semantically-aware object sketching

Open access
Vinker, Yael, Pajouheshgar, Ehsan, Bo, Jessica Y., Bachmann, Roman Christian, Bermano, Amit Haim, Cohen-Or, Daniel, Zamir, Amir, Shamir, Ariel·2022·ACM Transactions on Graphics

Abstract

Abstraction is at the heart of sketching due to the simple and minimal nature of line drawings. Abstraction entails identifying the essential visual properties of an object or scene, which requires semantic understanding and prior knowledge of high-level concepts. Abstract depictions are therefore challenging for artists, and even more so for machines. We present CLIPasso, an object sketching method that can achieve different levels of abstraction, guided by geometric and semantic simplifications. While sketch generation methods often rely on explicit sketch datasets for training, we utilize the remarkable ability of CLIP (Contrastive-Language-Image-Pretraining) to distill semantic concepts from sketches and images alike. We define a sketch as a set of Bézier curves and use a differentiable rasterizer to optimize the parameters of the curves directly with respect to a CLIP-based perceptual loss. The abstraction degree is controlled by varying the number of strokes. The generated sketches demonstrate multiple levels of abstraction while maintaining recognizability, underlying structure, and essential visual components of the subject drawn.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3528223.3530068

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human behaviours, emotions, events, actions, and humour are multimodal, so various human-centred multimodal learning tasks are widely studied.

    “Furthermore, human behaviours, emotions, events, actions, and humour are multimodal, thus various human-centred MML tasks are widely studied, including multimodal emotion recognition [67], multimodal event representation [68], understanding multimodal humor [69], face-body-voice based video person-clustering [70], etc.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinker, Y., Pajouheshgar, E., Bo, J. Y., Bachmann, R. C., Bermano, A. H., Cohen-Or, D., Zamir, A., & Shamir, A.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Tel Aviv University, Israel
  • Reichman University (IL)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Graphics
Published
2022-07
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7368
OpenAlex
W4286611322
Cited by
217
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 3
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Deutsch Foundation and the Yandex Initiative in Machine Learning
  • Israel Science Foundation (2492/20, 3441/21)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
sketch generation, abstraction, CLIP, Bézier curves, differentiable rasterization, perceptual loss, geometric simplification, contrastive language-image pretraining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review