CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34Child Development and Digital TechnologyInnovative Human-Technology InteractionChildren's Rights and Participation

12 Ways to Empower: Designing for Children’s Digital Autonomy

Open access
Wang, Ge, Zhao, Jun, Van Kleek, Max, Shadbolt, Nigel·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/3544548.3580935
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In recent years, growing research has been made on supporting children to become more autonomous in the digital environment around them. However, there has been little consensus regarding the conceptualisation of digital autonomy for children in the HCI community and how best they can be supported. Through a systematic review of autonomy-supportive designs within HCI research, this paper makes three contributions: a landscape overview of the existing conceptualisation of Digital Autonomy for children within HCI; a framework of 12 distinct design mechanisms for supporting children’s digital autonomy, clustered into 5 categories by their common mechanisms; and an identification of 5 critical design considerations for future support of children’s digital autonomy. Our findings provide a critical understanding of current support for children’s digital autonomy in HCI. We highlight the importance of considering children’s digital autonomy from multi-perspectives and suggest critical factors and gaps to be considered for future autonomy-supportive designs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3544548.3580935

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 180

  1. Edith Ackermann et al. 1996. Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Routledge.
  2. José Alemany, Elena del Val, J Alberola, and Ana García-Fornes. 2019. Enhancing the privacy risk awareness of teenagers in online social networks through soft- paternalism mechanisms. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 129 (2019), 27-40.
  3. Jose Alemany, Elena Del Val, and Ana Garcia-Fornes. 2020. Assessing the Efectiveness of a Gamifed Social Network for Applying Privacy Concepts: An Empirical Study with Teens. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 13, 4 (2020), 777-789.
  4. Jose Alemany Bordera, Elena Del Val Noguera, and Ana García-Fornes. 2020. Empowering Users Regarding the Sensitivity of their Data in Social Networks through Nudge Mechanisms. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.310 · DOI
  5. Katherine R Arlinghaus and Craig A Johnston. 2018. Advocating for behavior change with education. American journal of lifestyle medicine 12, 2 (2018), 113-116.
  6. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3895-3905. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548 · DOI
  7. Carl Auerbach and Louise B Silverstein. 2003. Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. Vol. 21. NYU press.
  8. Ovidiu-Gabriel Baciu-Ureche, Carlie Sleeman, William C. Moody, and Suzanne J. Matthews. 2019. The Adventures of ScriptKitty: Using the Raspberry Pi to Teach Adolescents about Internet Safety. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (Tacoma, WA, USA) (SIGITE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 118-123. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3349266.3351399 · DOI
  9. Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Diva Smriti, Brenna McNally, Evan Golub, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2019. Stranger Danger! Social Media App Features Co-Designed with Children to Keep Them Safe Online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boise, ID, USA) (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 394-406. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323133 · DOI
  10. Rafael Ballagas, Thérèse E. Dugan, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Maria Sand- berg, Janet Go, Emily Reardon, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2013. Electric Agents: Fostering Sibling Joint Media Engagement through Interactive Television and Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Sup- ported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2441776.2441803 · DOI
  11. Albert Bandura. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 248-287.
  12. Troy E Beckert. 2007. Cognitive Autonomy and Self-Evaluation in Adolescence: A Conceptual Investigation and Instrument Development. North American Journal of Psychology 9, 3 (2007).
  13. WIM Beyers and LUC Goossens. 1999. Emotional autonomy, psychosocial ad- justment and parenting: Interactions, moderating and mediating efects. Journal of adolescence 22, 6 (1999), 753-769.
  14. Peter Blos. 1967. The second individuation process of adolescence. The psycho- analytic study of the child 22, 1 (1967), 162-186.
  15. George M Bodner. 1986. Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of chemical education 63, 10 (1986), 873.
  16. Alex Bowyer, Kyle Montague, Stuart Wheater, Ruth McGovern, Raghu Lingam, and Madeline Balaam. 2018. Understanding the Family Perspective on the Storage, Sharing and Handling of Family Civic Data. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173710 · DOI
  17. Justas Brazauskas, Susan Lechelt, Ethan Wood, Rebecca Evans, Su Adams, Emma McFarland, Nicolai Marquardt, and Yvonne Rogers. 2021. DataMoves: Entangling Data and Movement to Support Computer Science Education. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2068-2082. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3461778.3462039 · DOI
  18. Robin Brewer, Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Germaine Irwin, Jaye Nias, and Berthel Tate. 2013. Using Gamifcation to Motivate Children to Complete Empirical Studies in Lab Environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, New York, USA) (IDC '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 388-391. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485816 · DOI
  19. Lautaro Cabrera, John H. Maloney, and David Weintrop. 2019. Programs in the Palm of Your Hand: How Live Programming Shapes Children's Interactions with Physical Computing Devices. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Interna- tional Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boise, ID, USA) (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323138 · DOI
  20. Rafael A. Calvo, Dorian Peters, Daniel Johnson, and Yvonne Rogers. 2014. Autonomy in Technology Design. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI EA '14). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37-40. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2560468 · DOI
  21. Philip Carne Candy. 1987. Reframing research into'self-direction'in adult edu- cation: A constructivist perspective. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of British Columbia.
  22. Ana Caraban, Evangelos Karapanos, Daniel Gonçalves, and Pedro Campos. 2019. 23 ways to nudge: A review of technology-mediated nudging in human- computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-15.
  23. Mark Conner and Christopher J Armitage. 1998. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of applied social psychology 28, 15 (1998), 1429-1464.
  24. Imelda Coyne, Inger Hallström, and Maja Söderbäck. 2016. Reframing the focus from a family-centred to a child-centred care approach for children's healthcare. Journal of Child Health Care 20, 4 (2016), 494-502.
  25. Patricia M Crittenden. 1990. Toward a concept of autonomy in adolescents with a disability. Children's Health Care 19, 3 (1990), 162-168.
  26. S Danby, Marilyn Fleer, Christina Davidson, and Maria Hatzigianni. 2018. Digital childhood. Springer.
  27. Sayamindu Dasgupta. 2013. From Surveys to Collaborative Art: Enabling Chil- dren to Program with Online Data. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, New York, USA) (IDC '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485784 · DOI
  28. Sayamindu Dasgupta and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2017. Scratch Community Blocks: Supporting Children as Data Scientists. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3620-3631. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025847 · DOI
  29. John Dempsey, Gavin Sim, Brendan Cassidy, and Vinh-Thong Ta. 2022. Children designing privacy warnings: Informing a set of design guidelines. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 31 (2022), 100446.
  30. Xiaozhou Deng, Danli Wang, Qiao Jin, and Fang Sun. 2019. ARCat: A Tangible Programming Tool for DFS Algorithm Teaching. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boise, ID, USA) (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 533-537. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3325308 · DOI
  31. Grifn Dietz, Jimmy K Le, Nadin Tamer, Jenny Han, Hyowon Gweon, Elizabeth L Murnane, and James A. Landay. 2021. StoryCoder: Teaching Computational Thinking Concepts Through Storytelling in a Voice-Guided App for Children. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 54, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445039 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Elizabeth Ann Malcolm Douvan, Elizabeth Douvan, and Joseph Adelson. 1966. The adolescent experience. Wiley.
  33. Liz Dowthwaite, Helen Creswick, Virginia Portillo, Jun Zhao, Menisha Patel, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Ansgar Koene, and Marina Jirotka. 2020. " It's your private information. it's your life. " young people's views of personal data use by online technologies. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference. 121-134.
  34. Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology 21, 1 (2002), 1-25.
  35. Allison Druin, Jerry A Fails, and Mona Leigh Guha. 2014. Including children in technology design processes: techniques and practices. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1021-1022.
  36. Gerald Dworkin. 1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge Univer- sity Press.
  37. Jonathan St BT Evans. 2003. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences 7, 10 (2003), 454-459.
  38. S Shirley Feldman and Doreen A Rosenthal. 1991. Age expectations of be- havioural autonomy in Hong Kong, Australian and American youth: The in- fuence of family variables and adolescents' values. International Journal of psychology 26, 1 (1991), 1-23.
  39. Anne C Fletcher and Bethany L Blair. 2014. Maternal authority regarding early adolescents' social technology use. Journal of Family Issues 35, 1 (2014), 54-74.
  40. Karen Ford, Judy Sankey, and Jackie Crisp. 2007. Development of children's assent documents using a child-centred approach. Journal of child health care 11, 1 (2007), 19-28.
  41. Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, Wendy Keay-Bright, and Helen Pain. 2012. Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2377-2386.
  42. Judy Garber and Stephanie A Little. 2001. Emotional autonomy and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Adolescent Research 16, 4 (2001), 355-371.
  43. Andrea Gauthier, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Iroise Dumontheil, Sveta Mayer, and Denis Mareschal. 2022. Manipulating Interface Design Features Afects Children's Stop-And-Think Behaviours in a Counterintuitive-Problem Game. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 29, 2 (2022), 1-22.
  44. Arup Kumar Ghosh, Charles E Hughes, and Pamela J Wisniewski. 2020. Circle of trust: a new approach to mobile online safety for families. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-14.
  45. Daniel G Goldstein, Eric J Johnson, Andreas Herrmann, and Mark Heitmann. 2008. Nudge your customers toward better choices. Harvard Business Review 86, 12 (2008), 99-105.
  46. Tobias Gritschacher and Wolfgang Slany. 2012. Standing on the shoulders of their peers: success factors for massive cooperation among children creating open source animations and games on their smartphones. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 264-267.
  47. Philip M Groves and Richard F Thompson. 1970. Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychological review 77, 5 (1970), 419.
  48. Hurst Hannum. 2011. Autonomy, sovereignty, and self-determination. University of Pennsylvania press.
  49. R. HEBERT, R. CARRIER, and A. BILODEAU. 1988. THE FUNCTIONAL AU- TONOMY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (SMAF): DESCRIPTION AND VALIDA- TION OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF HANDICAPS. Age and Ageing 17, 5 (09 1988), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/17.5. 293 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article-pdf/17/5/293/6933923/17-5- 293.pdf · DOI
  50. Susan L Hendrix, Michael Eisenberg, et al. 2006. Computer-assisted pop-up design for children: computationally enriched paper engineering. Advanced Technology for Learning 3, 2 (2006), 119-127.
  51. Alexis Hiniker, Sharon S Heung, Sungsoo Hong, and Julie A Kientz. 2018. Coco's videos: An empirical investigation of video-player design features and children's media use. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-13.
  52. Alexis Hiniker, Bongshin Lee, Kiley Sobel, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2017. Plan and Play: Supporting Intentional Media Use in Early Childhood. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079752 · DOI
  53. Tom Hitron, Yoav Orlev, Iddo Wald, Ariel Shamir, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuck- erman. 2019. Can children understand machine learning concepts? The efect of uncovering black boxes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1-11.
  54. Mary Hohmann, David P Weikart, and Ann S Epstein. 1995. Educating young chil- dren: Active learning practices for preschool and child care programs. High/Scope Press Ypsilanti, MI.
  55. Michael S Horn, Sarah AlSulaiman, and Jaime Koh. 2013. Translating Roberto to Omar: computational literacy, stickerbooks, and cultural forms. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 120-127.
  56. Weimin Hou, Anita Komlodi, Wayne Lutters, Karoly Hercegf, Jennifer J Preece, and Allison J Druin. 2015. Supporting children's online identity in international communities. Behaviour & Information Technology 34, 4 (2015), 375-391.
  57. Sherry Hsi and Michael Eisenberg. 2012. Math on a sphere: Using public displays to support children's creativity and computational thinking on 3D surfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 248-251.
  58. Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research 15, 9 (2005), 1277-1288.
  59. Fergus P Hughes. 2021. Children, play, and development. SAGE publications.
  60. Yasmin Kafai, Chris Proctor, and Debora Lui. 2020. From theory bias to theory dialogue: embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. ACM Inroads 11, 1 (2020), 44-53.
  61. Minsam Ko, Seungwoo Choi, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, and Uichin Lee. 2015. FamiLync: facilitating participatory parental mediation of adolescents' smart- phone use. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 867-878.
  62. Roger Kobak and Holland Cole. 1994. Implications for Adolescent Autonomy. Disorders and dysfunctions of the self 5 (1994), 267.
  63. Priya Kumar, Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg, Jonathan Yang, Brenna McNally, and Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2018. Co-designing online privacy- related games and stories with children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM confer- ence on interaction design and children. 67-79.
  64. Kristiina Kumpulainen and Julia Gillen. 2017. Young children's digital literacy practices in the home: A review of the literature. Cost Action ISI1410 DigiLitEY (2017).
  65. Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefts of collaborative learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 31 (2012), 486-490.
  66. Susie D Lamborn and Laurence Steinberg. 1993. Emotional autonomy redux: revisiting Ryan and Lynch. Child development 64, 2 (1993), 483-499.
  67. Rachel Langford. 2010. Critiquing child-centred pedagogy to bring children and early childhood educators into the centre of a democratic pedagogy. Contempo- rary Issues in Early Childhood 11, 1 (2010), 113-127.
  68. Ruth Lapidoth. 1997. Autonomy: Flexible solutions to ethnic conficts. US Institute of Peace Press.
  69. Tak Yeon Lee, Matthew Louis Mauriello, June Ahn, and Benjamin B Bederson. 2014. CTArcade: Computational thinking with games in school age children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 2, 1 (2014), 26-33.
  70. Marvin Levine. 2022. A cognitive theory of learning: Research on hypothesis testing. Taylor & Francis.
  71. Breanne K Litts, Apoorva Chauhan, Chase K Mortensen, and Kamaehu Matthias. 2019. I'm Drowning in Squirrels! How Children Embody and Debug Compu- tational Algorithms Through Designing Mixed Reality Games. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 267-273.
  72. Sonia Livingstone, Mariya Stoilova, and Rishita Nandagiri. 2019. Children's data and privacy online. Technology 58, 2 (2019), 157-65.
  73. M Judith Lynam and Louise Tenn. 1989. Communication: A tool for the negotia- tion of independence in families with adolescents. Journal of Advanced Nursing 14, 8 (1989), 653-660.
  74. Sana Maqsood, Christine Mekhail, and Sonia Chiasson. 2018. A day in the life of jos: a web-based game to increase children's digital literacy. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on interaction design and children. 241-252.
  75. Brenna McNally, Priya Kumar, Chelsea Hordatt, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Shal- mali Naik, Leyla Norooz, Alazandra Shorter, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2018. Co-designing mobile online safety applications with children. In Pro- ceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-9.
  76. Sally Engle Merry, Pat O'Malley, and Susan Silbey. 2000. Autonomy and ethnicity: negotiating competing claims in multi-ethnic states. Cambridge University Press.
  77. Sara Miller and Lisa Pennycuf. 2008. The power of story: Using storytelling to improve literacy learning. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education 1, 1 (2008), 36-43.
  78. Amy Mullin. 2014. Children, paternalism and the development of autonomy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, 3 (2014), 413-426.
  79. Liora Nasi, Yoel Nasi, Can Aydin, Rana Taki, Batuhan Byaraktar, Ece Tabag, and Sedat Yalcin. 2019. Pomelo, a collaborative education technology interaction ro- bot. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 757-758.
  80. Elizabeth U Neel, Susan Jay, and Iris F Litt. 1985. The relationship of self- concept and autonomy to oral contraceptive compliance among adolescent females. Journal of adolescent health care 6, 6 (1985), 445-447.
  81. Marc J Noom, Maja Deković, and Wim Meeus. 2001. Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. Journal of youth and adolescence 30, 5 (2001), 577-595.
  82. Netta Ofer, Idan David, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Coding for outdoor play: a coding platform for children to invent and enhance outdoor play experiences. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-12.
  83. Andrea Grimes Parker, Ian McClendon, Catherine Grevet, Victoria Ayo, Won- Taek Chung, Veda Johnson, and Elizabeth D Mynatt. 2013. I am what I eat: Identity & critical thinking in an online health forum for kids. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2437-2446.
  84. Monisha Pasupathi, Risha M Henry, and Laura L Carstensen. 2002. Age and ethnicity diferences in storytelling to young children: Emotionality, relationality and socialization. Psychology and Aging 17, 4 (2002), 610.
  85. Ronald William Keith Paterson. 2010. Values, education and the adult. Routledge.
  86. Dorian Peters, Rafael A Calvo, and Richard M Ryan. 2018. Designing for moti- vation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 797.
  87. Lara Schibelsky Godoy Piccolo, Pinelopi Troullinou, and Harith Alani. 2021. Chatbots to support children in coping with online threats: Socio-technical requirements. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1504-1517.
  88. Marta Poblet, Emma Teodoro, Jorge González-Conejero, Rebeca Varela, and Pompeu Casanovas. 2017. A co-regulatory approach to stay safe online: report- ing inappropriate content with the MediaKids mobile app. Journal of Family Studies 23, 2 (2017), 180-197.
  89. Johnmarshall Reeve et al. 2002. Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. Handbook of self-determination research 2 (2002), 183-204.
  90. Jennifer A. Rode, Anne Weibert, Andrea Marshall, Konstantin Aal, Thomas von Rekowski, Houda El Mimouni, and Jennifer Booker. 2015. From Compu- tational Thinking to Computational Making. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804261 · DOI
  91. Elisa Rubegni, Monica Landoni, Laura Malinverni, and Letizia Jaccheri. 2022. Raising Awareness of Stereotyping Through Collaborative Digital Storytelling: Design for Change with and for Children. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 157 (2022), 102727.
  92. Richard M Ryan and Cynthia L Powelson. 1991. Autonomy and relatedness as fundamental to motivation and education. The journal of experimental education 60, 1 (1991), 49-66.
  93. Nikita Sangal, Dhairya Singhvi, Madhura Pharande, and Deepti Patole. 2021. Teen-alyse: A Mobile Application for Parental control, Teen Self-Monitoring and Active Mediation. In 2021 9th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions)(ICRITO). IEEE, 1-5.
  94. Frances M Sessa and Laurence Steinberg. 1991. Family structure and the devel- opment of autonomy during adolescence. The Journal of early adolescence 11, 1 (1991), 38-55.
  95. Erica D Shifet-Chila, Rena D Harold, Victoria A Fitton, and Brian K Ahmedani. 2016. Adolescent and family development: Autonomy and identity in the digital age. Children and Youth Services Review 70 (2016), 364-368.
  96. Hyunjin Shin and Gahgene Gweon. 2020. Supporting preschoolers' transitions from screen time to screen-free time using augmented reality and encouraging ofine leisure activity. Computers in Human Behavior 105 (2020), 106212.
  97. Smita Shukla, Craig H Kennedy, and Lisa Sharon Cushing. 1998. Adult infuence on the participation of peers without disabilities in peer support programs. Journal of Behavioral Education 8, 4 (1998), 397-413.
  98. SB Silverberg and DM Gondoli. 1996. Autonomy in adolescence. A contextual- ized perspective. En GR Adams, R. Montemayor, & TP Gullotta (Eds.) Psychoso- cial development during adolescence. Thousand Oak.
  99. Arash Soleimani, Keith Evan Green, Danielle Herro, and Ian D Walker. 2016. A tangible, story-construction process employing spatial, computational-thinking. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 157-166.
  100. Hila J Spear and Pamela Kulbok. 2004. Autonomy and adolescence: A concept analysis. Public Health Nursing 21, 2 (2004), 144-152.
  101. Hila J Spear and Pamela A Kulbok. 2001. Adolescent health behaviors and related factors: A review. Public health nursing 18, 2 (2001), 82-93.
  102. Samantha Speer, Emily Hamner, Michael Tasota, Lauren Zito, and Sarah K Byrne-Houser. 2021. MindfulNest: Strengthening Emotion Regulation with Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 103-111.
  103. Katta Spiel, Laura Malinverni, Judith Good, and Christopher Frauenberger. 2017. Participatory evaluation with autistic children. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5755-5766.
  104. Candice R Stefanou, Kathleen C Perencevich, Matthew DiCintio, and Julianne C Turner. 2004. Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational psychologist 39, 2 (2004), 97-110.
  105. Chanelle Tarabay and Alessandra K. Teunisse. 2020. Functional Autonomy. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1689-1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-24612-3_1381 · DOI
  106. Michael Tkacik. 2008. Characteristics of forms of autonomy. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 15, 2-3 (2008), 369-401.
  107. Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2021. Protection or Punishment? Relating the Design Space of Parental Control Apps and Percep- tions about Them to Support Parenting for Online Safety. 5, CSCW2, Article 343 (oct 2021), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476084 · DOI
  108. Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2022. 'Don't make assumptions about me!': Understanding Children's Perception of Datafcation Online. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 419 (nov 2022), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555144 · DOI
  109. Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2022. Informing Age-Appropriate AI: Examining Principles and Practices of AI for Children. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3491102.3502057 · DOI · Paper page
  110. James V Wertsch. 1984. The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1984, 23 (1984), 7-18.
  111. Meredydd Williams, Jason RC Nurse, and Sadie Creese. 2019. (Smart) Watch Out! encouraging privacy-protective behavior through interactive games. Inter- national Journal of Human-Computer Studies 132 (2019), 121-137.
  112. Annika Wolf, Michel Wermelinger, and Marian Petre. 2019. Exploring design principles for data literacy activities to support children's inquiries from complex data. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 129 (2019), 41-54.
  113. Elizabeth Wood. 2007. Reconceptualising Child-Centred Education: Contempo- rary Directions in Policy, Theory and Practice in Early Childhood.. In FORUM: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, Vol. 49. ERIC, 119-134.
  114. Julia Woodward, Zari McFadden, Nicole Shiver, Amir Ben-Hayon, Jason C Yip, and Lisa Anthony. 2018. Using co-design to examine how children conceptualize intelligent interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-14.
  115. Christine Ee Ling Yap and Jung-Joo Lee. 2020. 'Phone apps know a lot about you!' educating early adolescents about informational privacy through a phygital interactive book. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference. 49-62.
  116. Jun Zhao, Blanche Duron, and Ge Wang. 2022. KOALA Hero: Inform Children of Privacy Risks of Mobile Apps. In Interaction Design and Children (Braga, Portugal) (IDC '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 523-528. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501712.3535278 · DOI
  117. Jun Zhao, Ge Wang, Carys Dally, Petr Slovak, Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. I make up a silly name' Understanding Children's Perception of Privacy Risks Online. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-13.
  118. Kening Zhu, Xiaojuan Ma, Gary Ka Wai Wong, and John Man Ho Huen. 2016. How diferent input and output modalities support coding as a problem-solving process for children. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 238-245.
  119. A PAPERS INCLUDED IN THE SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (1) Grifn Dietz, Jimmy K Le, Nadin Tamer, Jenny Han, Hyowon Gweon, Elizabeth L Murnane, and James A. Landay. 2021. StoryCoder: Teaching Computational Thinking Concepts Through Storytelling in a Voice-Guided App for Children. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 54, 1-15.
  120. Arup Kumar Ghosh, Charles E. Hughes, and Pamela J. Wis- niewski. 2020. Circle of Trust: A New Approach to Mobile Online Safety for Families. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-14.
  121. Alex Bowyer, Kyle Montague, Stuart Wheater, Ruth McGov- ern, Raghu Lingam, and Madeline Balaam. 2018. Understand- ing the Family Perspective on the Storage, Sharing and Han- dling of Family Civic Data. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 136, 1-13.
  122. Alexis Hiniker, Sharon S. Heung, Sungsoo (Ray) Hong, and Julie A. Kientz. 2018. Coco's Videos: An Empirical Investiga- tion of Video-Player Design Features and Children's Media Use. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 254, 1-13.
  123. Netta Ofer, Idan David, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Coding for Outdoor Play: a Coding Platform for Chil- dren to Invent and Enhance Outdoor Play Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 164, 1-12.
  124. Andrea Grimes Parker, Ian McClendon, Catherine Grevet, Victoria Ayo, WonTaek Chung, Veda Johnson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2013. I am what i eat: identity & critical thinking in an online health forum for kids. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2437-2446.
  125. Brenna McNally, Priya Kumar, Chelsea Hordatt, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Shalmali Naik, Leyla Norooz, Alazandra Shorter, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2018. Co-designing Mobile Online Safety Applications with Children. In Pro- ceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 523, 1-9.
  126. Sayamindu Dasgupta and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2017. Scratch Community Blocks: Supporting Children as Data Scientists. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Fac- tors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Com- puting Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3620-3631.
  127. Tom Hitron, Yoav Orlev, Iddo Wald, Ariel Shamir, Hadas Erel, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Can Children Understand Machine Learning Concepts? The Efect of Uncovering Black Boxes. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 415, 1-11.
  128. Julia Woodward, Zari McFadden, Nicole Shiver, Amir Ben- hayon, Jason C. Yip, and Lisa Anthony. 2018. Using Co- Design to Examine How Children Conceptualize Intelligent Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 575, 1-14.
  129. Yasmeen Hashish, Andrea Bunt, and James E. Young. 2014. Involving children in content control: a collaborative and education-oriented content fltering approach. In Proceed- ings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, 1797-1806.
  130. Rafael Ballagas, Thérèse E. Dugan, Glenda Revelle, Koichi Mori, Maria Sandberg, Janet Go, Emily Reardon, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2013. Electric agents: fostering sibling joint media engagement through interactive television and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225-236.
  131. L. Nasi et al., "Pomelo, a Collaborative Education Technol- ogy Interaction Robot," 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2019, pp. 757-758
  132. Jennifer A. Rode, Anne Weibert, Andrea Marshall, Konstantin Aal, Thomas von Rekowski, Houda El Mimouni, and Jennifer Booker. 2015. From computational thinking to computational making. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Ubi- Comp '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 239-250.
  133. Poblet, Marta, et al. "A co-regulatory approach to stay safe online: reporting inappropriate content with the MediaKids mobile app. " Journal of Family Studies 23.2 (2017): 180-197.
  134. Rubegni, Elisa, et al. "Raising Awareness of Stereotyping Through Collaborative Digital Storytelling: Design for Change with and for Children." International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 157 (2022): 102727.
  135. Rodríguez, Inmaculada, et al. "Evaluating the efect of gam- ifcation on the deployment of digital cultural probes for children. " International journal of Human-Computer studies 137 (2020): 102395.
  136. Wolf, Annika, Michel Wermelinger, and Marian Petre. "Ex- ploring design principles for data literacy activities to sup- port children's inquiries from complex data." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 129 (2019): 41-54.
  137. Alemany, José, et al. "Enhancing the privacy risk aware- ness of teenagers in online social networks through soft- paternalism mechanisms. " International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 129 (2019): 27-40.
  138. Anja Thieme, Cecily Morrison, Nicolas Villar, Martin Grayson, and Siân Lindley. 2017. Enabling Collaboration in Learning Computer Programing Inclusive of Children with Vision Im- pairments. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Design- ing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 739-752.
  139. Lara Schibelsky Godoy Piccolo, Pinelopi Troullinou, and Harith Alani. 2021. Chatbots to Support Children in Cop- ing with Online Threats: Socio-technical Requirements. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (DIS '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1504-1517.
  140. Justas Brazauskas, Susan Lechelt, Ethan Wood, Rebecca Evans, Su Adams, Emma McFarland, Nicolai Marquardt, and Yvonne Rogers. 2021. DataMoves: Entangling Data and Movement to Support Computer Science Education. In Designing Inter- active Systems Conference 2021 (DIS '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2068-2082.
  141. Andrea Gauthier, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Iroise Dumon- theil, Sveta Mayer, and Denis Mareschal. 2022. Manipulat- ing Interface Design Features Afects Children's Stop-And- Think Behaviours in a Counterintuitive-Problem Game. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 2, Article 12 (April 2022), 22 pages.
  142. Samantha Speer, Emily Hamner, Michael Tasota, Lauren Zito, and Sarah K. Byrne-Houser. 2021. MindfulNest: Strengthen- ing Emotion Regulation with Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Mul- timodal Interaction (ICMI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103-111.
  143. Alexis Hiniker, Bongshin Lee, Kiley Sobel, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2017. Plan & Play: Supporting Intentional Media Use in Early Childhood. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 85-95.
  144. Tobias Gritschacher and Wolfgang Slany. 2012. Standing on the shoulders of their peers: success factors for massive co- operation among children creating open source animations and games on their smartphones. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Chil- dren (IDC '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 264-267.
  145. Sayamindu Dasgupta. 2013. From surveys to collaborative art: enabling children to program with online data. In Pro- ceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 28-35.
  146. Alexis Hiniker, Kiley Sobel, Sungsoo Ray Hong, Hyewon Suh, India Irish, Daniella Kim, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. Touchscreen prompts for preschoolers: designing develop- mentally appropriate techniques for teaching young children to perform gestures. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109-118.
  147. Xiaozhou Deng, Danli Wang, Qiao Jin, and Fang Sun. 2019. ARCat: A Tangible Programming Tool for DFS Algorithm Teaching. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 533-537.
  148. Priya Kumar, Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L. Clegg, Jonathan Yang, Brenna McNally, and Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2018. Co-designing online privacy-related games and stories with children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67-79.
  149. Arash Soleimani, Keith Evan Green, Danielle Herro, and Ian D. Walker. 2016. A Tangible, Story-Construction Process Em- ploying Spatial, Computational-Thinking. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16). Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA, 157-166.
  150. Breanne K. Litts, Apoorva Chauhan, Chase K. Mortensen, and Kamaehu Matthias. 2019. I'm Drowning in Squirrels! How Children Embody and Debug Computational Algo- rithms Through Designing Mixed Reality Games. In Pro- ceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on In- teraction Design and Children (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 267-273.
  151. Kening Zhu, Xiaojuan Ma, Gary Ka Wai Wong, and John Man Ho Huen. 2016. How Diferent Input and Output Modalities Support Coding as a Problem-Solving Process for Children. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 238-245.
  152. Louise P. Flannery, Brian Silverman, Elizabeth R. Kazakof, Marina Umaschi Bers, Paula Bontá, and Mitchel Resnick. 2013. Designing ScratchJr: support for early childhood learn- ing through computer programming. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-10.
  153. Arnan Sipitakiat and Nusarin Nusen. 2012. Robo-Blocks: de- signing debugging abilities in a tangible programming sys- tem for early primary school children. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 98-105.
  154. Michael S. Horn, Sarah AlSulaiman, and Jaime Koh. 2013. Translating Roberto to Omar: computational literacy, sticker- books, and cultural forms. In Proceedings of the 12th Interna- tional Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 120-127.
  155. Sherry Hsi and Michael Eisenberg. 2012. Math on a sphere: using public displays to support children's creativity and computational thinking on 3D surfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 248-251.
  156. Lautaro Cabrera, John H. Maloney, and David Weintrop. 2019. Programs in the Palm of your Hand: How Live Programming Shapes Children's Interactions with Physical Computing Devices. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Con- ference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '19). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 227-236.
  157. Christine Ee Ling Yap and Jung-Joo Lee. 2020. 'Phone apps know a lot about you!': educating early adolescents about informational privacy through a phygital interactive book. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Con- ference (IDC '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49-62.
  158. Liz Dowthwaite, Helen Creswick, Virginia Portillo, Jun Zhao, Menisha Patel, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Ansgar Koene, and Ma- rina Jirotka. 2020. "It's your private information. it's your life.": young people's views of personal data use by online technologies. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121-134.
  159. Lee, Tak Yeon, et al. "CTArcade: Computational thinking with games in school age children. " International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 2.1 (2014): 26-33.
  160. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing Cyber- bullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Partic- ipatory Design With Teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3895-3905.
  161. Minsam Ko, Seungwoo Choi, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, and Uichin Lee. 2015. FamiLync: facilitating participatory parental mediation of adolescents' smartphone use. In Pro- ceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 867-878.
  162. Shin, Hyunjin, and Gahgene Gweon. "Supporting preschool- ers' transitions from screen time to screen-free time using augmented reality and encouraging ofine leisure activity. " Computers in Human Behavior 105 (2020): 106212.
  163. Alemany, Jose, Elena Del Val, and Ana Garcia-Fornes. "As- sessing the Efectiveness of a Gamifed Social Network for Applying Privacy Concepts: An Empirical Study with Teens. " IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 13.4 (2020): 777- 789.
  164. Bekker, Tilde, et al. "Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digital toolkits in schools." In- ternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5 (2015): 29-38.
  165. Sana Maqsood, Christine Mekhail, and Sonia Chiasson. 2018. A day in the life of jos: a web-based game to increase chil- dren's digital literacy. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Con- ference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 241-252.
  166. Sangal, Nikita, et al. "Teen-alyse: A Mobile Application for Parental control, Teen Self-Monitoring and Active Media- tion." 2021 9th International Conference on Reliability, In- focom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions)(ICRITO). IEEE, 2021.
  167. Nikita Soni, Aishat Aloba, Kristen S. Morga, Pamela J. Wis- niewski, and Lisa Anthony. 2019. A Framework of Touch- screen Interaction Design Recommendations for Children (TIDRC): Characterizing the Gap between Research Evidence and Design Practice. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Interna- tional Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 419-431.
  168. Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Diva Smriti, Brenna McNally, Evan Golub, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2019. Stranger Danger! Social Media App Features Co-designed with Children to Keep Them Safe Online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 394-406.
  169. Ovidiu-Gabriel Baciu-Ureche, Carlie Sleeman, William C. Moody, and Suzanne J. Matthews. 2019. The Adventures of ScriptKitty: Using the Raspberry Pi to Teach Adolescents about Internet Safety. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 118-123.
  170. Bowler, Leanne, Eleanor Mattern, and Cory Knobel. "Devel- oping design interventions for cyberbullying: A narrative- based participatory approach. " iConference 2014 Proceedings (2014).
  171. Minsam Ko, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, Christian Heizmann, Jinyoung Jeong, Uichin Lee, Daehee Shin, Koji Yatani, June- hwa Song, and Kyong-Mee Chung. 2015. NUGU: A Group- based Intervention App for Improving Self-Regulation of Limiting Smartphone Use. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1235-1245.
  172. Williams, Meredydd, Jason RC Nurse, and Sadie Creese. "(Smart) Watch Out! encouraging privacy-protective behavior through interactive games. " International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 132 (2019): 121-137.
  173. Michela Ferron, Chiara Leonardi, Paolo Massa, Gianluca Schi- avo, Amy L. Murphy, and Elisabetta Farella. 2019. A Walk on the Child Side: Investigating Parents' and Children's Ex- perience and Perspective on Mobile Technology for Outdoor Child Independent Mobility. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 597, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300827 · DOI
  174. Kiley Sobel, Kyle Rector, Susan Evans, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Incloodle: Evaluating an Interactive Application for Young Children with Mixed Abilities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sys- tems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858114 · DOI
  175. Brittany Garcia, Sharon Lynn Chu, Beth Nam, and Colin Ban- igan. 2018. Wearables for Learning: Examining the Smart- watch as a Tool for Situated Science Refection. In Proceed- ings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Ma- chinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 256, 1-13.
  176. Laura Scheepmaker, Kay Kender, Christopher Frauenberger, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2021. Leaving the Field: Designing a Socio-Material Toolkit for Teachers to Continue to Design Technology with Children. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 145, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445462 · DOI
  177. Mille Skovhus Lunding, Jens Emil Sloth Grønbæk, Karl-Emil Kjær Bilstrup, Marie-Louise Stisen Kjerstein Sørensen, and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2022. ExposAR: Bringing Aug- mented Reality to the Computational Thinking Agenda through a Collaborative Authoring Tool. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 131, 1-14.
  178. Dempsey, John, et al. "Children designing privacy warnings: Informing a set of design guidelines. " International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 31 (2022): 100446.
  179. Desimpelaere, Laurien, Liselot Hudders, and Dieneke Van de Sompel. "Children's perceptions of fairness in a data dis- closure context: The efect of a reward on the relationship between privacy literacy and disclosure behavior. " Telematics and Informatics 61 (2021): 101602.
  180. Zhang-Kennedy, Leah, Yomna Abdelaziz, and Sonia Chias- son. "Cyberheroes: The design and evaluation of an inter- active ebook to educate children about online privacy." In- ternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 13 (2017): 10-18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, G., Zhao, J., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-04-19
Pages
1-27
DOI
10.1145/3544548.3580935
OpenAlex
W4366547645
Cited by
34
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3
FWCI
80.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ethical Web and Data Architectures (EWADA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
digital autonomy, children, design mechanisms, children's technology use, human-computer interaction with children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review