Cited by 3Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesTactile and Sensory InteractionsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

“Unfold and Go Touch”: A Portable Method for Making Existing Touchscreens Accessible to Blind and Low Vision People in Self-Service Terminals

Open access
Lin, Weiyue, Li, Ting, Liu, Liu, Zhu, Qian·2023·Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Self-service terminals (SSTs) are almost everywhere in our daily life and increasingly use capacitive and infrared touchscreens as the interface. Most of the current solutions to help blind and low vision (BLV) people access existing touchscreens mostly are only suitable for capacitive touchscreens and not for infrared touchscreens. In this paper, we proposed a voice-based interactive method using a conductive folding stand with the phone camera to allow BLV people to access both touchscreens of SSTs. Voice feedback was provided to guide users to move the phone close to the button and touch it with the end of the unfolded stand. Using a portable accessory, this method directly guided users to touch the target and effectively avoids false triggering. A preliminary evaluation indicated that our approach enabled users to access the target buttons on the touchscreen with high accuracy and a short completion time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3544549.3585819

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Timothy Hoye and Joseph Kozak. 2010. Touch screens: A pressing technology. In Tenth Annual Freshman Engineering Sustainability in the New Millennium Conference April, Vol. 10.
  2. Ian Maxwell. 2007. An overview of optical-touch technologies. Information Display 23, 12 (2007), 26.
  3. Helen Petrie, Jenny S. Darzentas, and Christopher Power. 2014. Self-Service Ter- minals for Older and Disabled Users: Attitudes of Key Stakeholders. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Klaus Miesenberger, Deborah Fels, Dominique Archambault, Petr Peňáz, and Wolfgang Zagler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 340-347.
  4. André Rodrigues, Kyle Montague, Hugo Nicolau, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2015. Get- ting smartphones to talkback: Understanding the smartphone adoption process of blind users. In Proceedings of the 17th international acm sigaccess conference on computers & accessibility. 23-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, W., Li, T., Liu, L., & Zhu, Q.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
Lin, Weiyue
Venue
Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-04-19
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W4366597145
Cited by
3
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
self-service terminals, capacitive touch screen, voice feedback, portable assistive device, false triggering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review