The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Configuring role-based access control to enforce mandatory and discretionary access control policies
Open accessAbstract
Access control models have traditionally included mandatory access control (or lattice-based access control) and discretionary access control. Subsequently, role-based access control has been introduced, along with claims that its mechanisms are general enough to simulate the traditional methods. In this paper we provide systematic constructions for various common forms of both of the traditional access control paradigms using the role-based access control (RBAC) models of Sandhu et al., commonly called RBAC96. We see that all of the features of the RBAC96 model are required, and that although for the manatory access control simulation, only one administrative role needs to be assumed, for the discretionary access control simulations, a complex set of administrative roles is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proposed NIST standard for role-based access control
Ferraiolo, D. F., Sandhu, R., Gavrila, S., Kuhn, D. R., & Chandramouli, R. (2001) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/501978.501980 · Cited by 2,544
Self-citationThe NIST model for role-based access control: towards a unified standard
Sandhu, R., Ferraiolo, D., & Kuhn, R. (2000) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM workshop on Role-based access control · doi:10.1145/344287.344301 · Cited by 877
Self-citationRole-based authorization constraints specification
Ahn, G.-J., & Sandhu, R. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/382912.382913 · Cited by 416
Self-citationA Survey of Blockchain-Based Schemes for Data Sharing and Exchange
Song, R., Xiao, B., Song, Y., Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2023.3293279 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Osborn, S., Sandhu, R., & Munawer, Q.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-106
- ISSN
- 1094-9224 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7406
- OpenAlex
- W2148952798
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 92.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Configuring role-based access control to enforce mandatory and discretionary access control policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/354876.354878
- The paper
- Osborn, S., Sandhu, R., & Munawer, Q. (2000). Configuring role-based access control to enforce mandatory and discretionary access control policies. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/354876.354878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
