The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 9 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Reputation systems
Open accessAbstract
T he Internet offers vast new opportunities to interact with total strangers. These interactions can be fun, informative, even profitable. But they also involve risk. Is the advice of a self-proclaimed expert at expertcentral.com reliable? Will an unknown dotcom site or eBay seller ship items promptly with appropriate packaging? Will the product be the same one described online?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the overall rate of successful transactions remains astonishingly high for a market as”
- Also stated in: § MARC MONGEAU · hedged
“ripe with the possibility of largescale fraud and deceit”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] 5. Kollock, P. The production of trust in online markets. In Advances in Group Processes, vol. 16, E. Lawler, M. Macy, S. Thyne, and H. Walker, Eds. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1999; see also www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/f aculty/kollock/papers/online_trust.htm.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § MARC MONGEAU · hedged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first is that people may not bother to provide feedback at all.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Such premiums are observed in auctions in auctions of coins and computer chips on eBay [3,6,7].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3] 3. Bajari, P. and Hortacsu, A. Winner's curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions; see www.stanford.edu/ ~bajari/wp/auction/ebay.pdf.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [6] 6. Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., and Reeves, D. Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions; see www.vanderbilt.edu/econ/reiley/papers/PenniesFromEBay.pdf.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [7] 7. Houser, D. and Wooders, J. Reputation in auctions: Theory and evidence from eBay; see bpa.arizona.edu/~jwooders/ebay.pdf.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third is the difficulty of ensuring honest reports.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these systems help people decide whom to trust, encourage trustworthy behavior, and deter participation by those who are unskilled or dishonest.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these systems help people decide whom to trust, encourage trustworthy behavior, and deter participation by those who are unskilled or dishonest.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reputation systems seek to establish the shadow of the future to each transaction by creating an expectation that other people will look back on it.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Game-theory analysis demonstrates that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of reputation systems when participants are allowed to start over with new names [4].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] 4. Friedman, E. and Resnick, P. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms; see www.si.umich.edu/~presnick/papers/identifiers/index.html.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A second difficulty in distributing feedback stems from the lack of portability from system to system.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Second, the expectation of reciprocity or retaliation in future interactions creates an incentive for good behavior.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [2] 2. Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York, 1984.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
- It may state two separate claims as one. 10
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite their theoretical and practical difficulties, it is reassuring that reputation systems appear to perform reasonably well.”
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: eBay's high rate of successful transactions is attributable to its reputation system.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At eBay, for example, a stream of buyers interacts with the same seller.They may never buy an item from the seller again, but by sharing their opinions about the seller via the Feedback Forum, they construct a meaningful history of the seller.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If buyers do behave this way, the sellers' reputations will affect their future sales.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite this promise, significant challenges remain in the operating phases of such systems: eliciting, distributing, and aggregating feedback.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Over time, high-quality sellers would desert the market.Eventually, only the lowest-quality sellers would remain, a dynamic economist George Akerlof memorialized as the”
- Also stated in: § MARC MONGEAU · plain
“market for lemons”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] 1. Akerlof, G. The market for 'lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84 (1970), 488-500. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § MARC MONGEAU · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even then, fear of retaliatory negative feedback or simply a desire to avoid further unpleasant interactions may keep a dissatisfied buyer quiet.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Systems that rely on the participation of large numbers of individuals accumulate trust simply by operating effectively over time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, sellers with stellar reputations may enjoy a premium on their services; some users may be willing to pay for the security and comfort of high-quality services.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of building trust, a boost in the quantity of information compensates for a significant reduction in its quality.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In particular, newcomers (those with no feedback) should always be distrusted until they have somehow paid their dues, either through an entry fee or by accepting more risk or worse prices while developing their reputations.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] 4. Friedman, E. and Resnick, P. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms; see www.si.umich.edu/~presnick/papers/identifiers/index.html.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These simple numerical ratings fail to convey important subtleties of online interactions; for example, Did the feedback come from low-value transactions?What were the reputations of the people providing the feedback?”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Internet services operate on a vastly larger scale”
- Also stated in: § MARC MONGEAU · plain
“than Main Street and permit virtually anonymous interactions.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § MARC MONGEAU · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Long-lived entities that inspire an expectation of future interaction;”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Today's reputation systems, by contrast, shouldn't work in theory.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Use of feedback to guide trust decisions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With clear reputation markers, low-quality sellers get lower prices, leaving a healthier market with a variety of prices and quality of service.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prior to the Internet, such questions were answered, in part, through personal and corporate reputations.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Strangers lack known past histories or the prospect of future interaction, and they are not subject to a network of informed individuals who would punish bad and reward good behavior.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These interactions can be fun, informative, even profitable.But they also involve risk.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Capture and distribution of feedback about current interactions (such information must be visible in the future); and”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Internet can vastly accelerate and add structure to the process of capturing and distributing information.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One party could blackmail another, threatening to post negative feedback unrelated to actual performance.At the other extreme, in order to accumulate positive feedback, a group of sellers might collaborate and rate one another positively, artificially inflating their individual reputations.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Future buyers, lacking personal histories with particular sellers, may still base their buying decisions on a sufficiently extensive public history.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When agreeing to be rated is optional (such as when registering as a retailer at bizrate.com), doing so is likely an indication of higher-quality services, even before ratings are available.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even if all reporting were complete and honest, users would find it virtually impossible to utilize the torrents of information they receive on other participants, given the lack of satisfactory summary statistics.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Limited distribution of feedback limits its effectiveness; the future casts a shadow on only a single online arena, not on many.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Buyers provide and rely on feedback in reputation systems.
“provide and rely on feedback-isolated interactions take on attributes of long-term relationships.”
The paper relies on this without support.
eBay's high rate of successful transactions is attributable to its reputation system.
“The high rate of successful transactions is attributerd by eBay to its reputation system, called the Feedback Forum.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Resnick et al. (2000) stated that the lack of reputation portability is problematic as ''[l]imited distribution of feedback limits its effectiveness'' (p. 48).”
From In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms (2022) · cites this paper as Resnick et al. 2000
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The growth of e-auctions and other forms of e-commerce is based, to a considerable degree, on reputation and trust 5-10 .”
From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Past research has argued that reputation systems and user-generated reviews may have the primary purpose of allowing users to learn more about each other before engaging in any interactions or transactions, acting as a monitoring and policing system [5,66,67].”
From Digital Identity: The effect of trust and reputation information on user judgement in the Sharing Economy (2018) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Nielsen, R. P., & Axelrod, R. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257983 · Cited by 6,517
The Winner's Curse, Reserve Prices, and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions
Bajari, P., Hortaçsu, A., & Hortacsu, A. (2003) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1593721 · Cited by 1,041
PENNIES FROM EBAY: THE DETERMINANTS OF PRICE IN ONLINE AUCTIONS*
Lucking‐Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., & Reeves, D. M. (2007) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00309.x · Cited by 550
(1999) · Advances in group processes · Cited by 426
Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (2000) · Advances in group processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(2000)17 · Cited by 247
How not to build an online market: the sociology of market microstructure
Kollock, P., & Braziel, E. R. (n.d.) · Advances in Group Processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(06)23011-x
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,101–2,164 of 2,164
Adaptive Brokering in Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce
Norman, T. J., Sleeman, D. H., & Chapman, N. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-412-8_25
Tool for simulating reputation management algorithms in mul- tiagent systems
Rudko, L. (2013) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
SISTEMI DI REPUTAZIONE E RACCOMANDAZIONE INTELLIGENTI
Bonaventura, P. (2013)
Trust and Reputation in Peer-to-Peer Systems
Despotovic, Z. (2009) · Encyclopedia of Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1225
Trust and Reputation in Peer-to-Peer Systems
Despotovic, Z. (2016) · Encyclopedia of Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_1225-2
The Impact of Heuristic Cues on User Purchase Decisions in Sharing-Based Short-Term Rental Platforms
Huo, M., Li, L., & Yao, Y. (2025) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2025.139041
Architectures and Algorithms for Socially-Aware Internet of Things Systems
Bhatia, A., Kumar, R., & Manteghi, G. (2026) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10122-8_2
Apna-Mitra: A Verified Hyper‑Local Mobile Application for Student Relocation Support App
Bhalekar, K. S. B., Dabire, R. U., Kasar, A. A., et al. (2025) · Vidhyayana · doi:10.58213/9dsyee66
The Misinformation Challenge: How Information Freedom Promotes Democratic Discourse
Rice, J. K. (2026) · Journal of Libertarian Studies · doi:10.35297/001c.155344
Kwongo, J. W. M., & Chatgpt, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6304757
Hernandez, R. H., Song, Q., Kou, Y., & Gui, X. (2026) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-026-09536-6
“Online reputation systems on eBay similarly use small, low-stakes acts like feedback between buyers and sellers to help establish trust among strangers over time (Resnick and Zeckhauser 2002; Resnick et al. 2000).”
QUALITY DYNAMICS IN REGULATED OLIGOPSONY MARKETS WITH REPUTATION SYSTEMS
Rao, S., & Sridhar, V. (2026) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525926500025
Kwongo, J. W. M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6368076
What Matters in Accounting Job Markets? Evidence from Freelancing EmploymentPreprint
Xu, X., Hasan, K., & ., E. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6413145
A Resilient Peer-to-Peer Validation Framework for Reliable Digital Coupon Utilization
Agarwal, K., Tiwari, R., Shukla, V., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS) · doi:10.1109/sceecs68810.2026.11430035
“This supports the argument that sharing in a community with measures for establishing trust allows authentic coupons to appear and reduces contributions that involve fraud [12]–[14].”
Институциональные и социально-экономические основания функционирования рынка услуг фриланса
Авдеева, В. Н. (2026) · Regional and Branch Economy · doi:10.47576/2949-1916.2025.10.10.002
Yang, X., Chen, B., & Cui, H. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15030199
Realized Network Value: A Micro-Level Model of Individual Platform ExperiencePreprint
Tripp, J. F. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6474500
Nouveau hashtag pour la juridiction
Sheffi, N. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f1587054zbc09z4d9azaaf7z658dabb56e30
Proactive inferior member participation management in innovation communities
Debaere, S. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1bcdbf57z04e2z4fd1zbd53zad4116b9c1e3
Transaction graph-based predictive hurdle model for credit scoring in DeFi lending protocols
M., A. M. F. L., Hegde, B. R., & Das, B. (2026) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-026-01097-7
Rôle de l'émotion dans la diffusion de messages par bouche à oreille électronique
Sinno, A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/14b02e3dz0d6cz4fd3za25cz410ec50ecb16
A Reputation-Based Vesting Mechanism for Decentralized Autonomous OrganizationsPreprint
Pi, P., Liang, X., Guan, S., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6585567
Konorski, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6612499
Trust-Aware Professional Identity Representation in AI-Mediated Systems
Anandani, S. (2026) · IEEE SoutheastCon · doi:10.1109/southeastcon63549.2026.11476584
“Work on online marketplaces and reputation platforms shows how structured feedback (ratings, reviews, endorsements) can serve as partial trust proxies [5], [6], but also how they can entrench bias, be gamed, or fail to capture important qualitative aspects of contribution.”
Crooner, E., & Owen, O. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6652979
A Blockchain-Based Reputation System for Consulting
Hemmrich, S., & Nissen, V. (2026) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17384-3_11
The evolution of trust under institutional moral hazard
Chiba-Okabe, H., & Plotkin, J. B. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2530718123 · Cited by 2
Alqithami, S. (2026) · Mathematical and Computational Applications · doi:10.3390/mca31030069
“Digital platforms and marketplaces have long relied on reputation systems to support trust under anonymity and scale [33].”
Trust-Supporting Governance of Smart Dynamic Ecosystems: Taxonomy and Key Components
Kušniráková, D., & Bühnová, B. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19050-5_10
Simulation Modeling and Evaluation of Node Reputation in P2P Networks
Mikhav, V., Мелешко, Є. В., Yakymenko, M., Didyk, O. K., Sereda, O., & Subbota, A. (2026) · Vìsnik Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu Lʹvìvsʹka polìtehnìka Serìâ Ìnformacìjnì sistemi ta merežì · doi:10.23939/sisn2026.19.483
Ibrahimli, U., Hemmrich, S., Zauke, S., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-08483-5_26
Ibrahimli, U., Hemmrich, S., & Winkelmann, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28316-0_6
The reciprocity gap: How autonomous AI agent networks challenge platform ecosystem design
Pérez, C., & Sokolova, K. (2026) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2026.105084
Yu, X., Yang, X., & Wang, H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10426337/v1
Ma, Z., Cai, E., Xing, W., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Software Services Engineering (SSE) · doi:10.1109/sse72781.2026.00021
“However, with the advent of decentralized web (Web3) and blockchain technologies, the paradigm has shifted towards computational trust , where trust is dynamically evaluated based on historical interactions, service reliability, and reputation evidence [4], [5].”
Parker, S. H. S., & Leonardi, P. M. (2026) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392261464889
Bouchiha, M. A., Ghamri-Doudane, Y. M., Rabah, M., Champagnat, R., & Bailly-Maitre, G. (2026) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2026.108789
Toward a cultural cyber-critical ecosystem: concepts, threats and challenges
Bellini, E., & Degl’Innocenti, E. (2026) · Digital Library Perspectives · doi:10.1108/dlp-01-2026-0031
Efe, E. (2026) · Politik Ekonomik Kuram · doi:10.30586/pek.1929134
Corradini, E. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.117150
@Rank: Personalized Centrality Measure for Email Communication Networks
Lubarski, P., & Morzy, M. (2014) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05912-9_10
Song, G., & Chen, X. (2012) · WHICEB
Reputationssysteme für das Enterprise 2.0
Reitzenstein, I., & Peters, R. (2010) · Gabler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-8737-2_22
Perspectives on Corporate Reputation and Reputation Transfer
Falkenreck, C. (2009) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2357-8_3
Integrating Reputation Services into emerging Web Services Architecture
Babu, R., & McGovern, J. (2003) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Risk and trust management for online distributed system
Chong, S. K. (2012)
Truth discovery under resource constraints
Etuk, A. (2015)
Design and Analysis of Electronic Feedback Mechanisms
Li, Q. (2012) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
Trust-but-Verify: Guaranteeing the Integrity of User-generated Content in Online Applications
Dua, A. (2000) · doi:10.15760/etd.1424
“When integrity verification methods have been used by applications, they have traditionally been based on reputation ratings [48, 66, 107], anomaly detection [29, 26, 104, 78], or user-device monitoring [84, 112].”
MethodDiscussing a Recommendation System to Support Participation in the Democratic Citizen Community
Martins, M., Medeiros, J., & Maciel, C. D. O. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2814058.2814164
Recomendação de conteúdo baseada em interações multimodais
da Costa, A. F. (2015) · doi:10.11606/d.55.2015.tde-09042015-153225
“2000 - 2004 Pesquisa: Sistemas de reputação (Resnick et al., 2000); Recomendação baseada em etiquetas (Johansson, 2003) Exemplo: Epinions.com Utilização da experiência do usuário na comunidade influenciando na relevância da sua opinião, e essa relevância utilizada para recomendar…”
BackgroundA Trust Metric for Online Virtual Teams and Work Groups
Sagar, A. B., & Mohanty, H. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13365-2_17
“Many trust models have been constructed for special computing environment such as ad hoc networks, peer-to-peer systems, and E-commerce [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10].”
BackgroundReputation based trust in service-oriented network environments
Adigun, E. (2011) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 45-48
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2337430557
- Cited by
- 2,190
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 134
- FWCI
- 145.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9977999)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- reputation systems, online trust, online interaction, e-commerce, peer reputation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
