Cited by 31Ethics and Social Impacts of AIInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMedia, Gender, and Advertising

Grep-BiasIR: A dataset for investigating gender representation bias in information retrieval results

Open access
Krieg, Klara, Parada-Cabaleiro, Emilia, Medicus, Gertraud, Lesota, Oleg, Schedl, Markus, Rekabsaz, Navid·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

Abstract

The provided contents by information retrieval (IR) systems can reflect the existing societal biases and stereotypes. Such biases in retrieval results can lead to further establishing and strengthening stereotypes in society and also in the systems. To facilitate the studies of gender bias in the retrieval results of IR systems, we introduce Gender Representation-Bias for Information Retrieval (Grep-BiasIR), a novel thoroughly-audited dataset consisting of 118 bias-sensitive neutral search queries. The set of queries covers a wide range of gender-related topics, for which a biased representation of genders in the search result can be considered as socially problematic. Each query is accompanied with one relevant and one non-relevant document, where the document is also provided in three variations of female, male, and neutral. The dataset is available at https://github.com/KlaraKrieg/GrepBiasIR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3576840.3578295

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grep-BiasIR provides 118 gender-neutral search queries for document retrieval to assess gender representation bias.

    “Gender Representation-Bias for Information Retrieval (GrepBiasIR) (Krieg et al. 2023) provides 118 gender-neutral search queries for document retrieval to assess gender representation bias.”

    From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Krieg et al. 2023

  • Grep-BiasIR pairs each query with a relevant and nonrelevant document with feminine, masculine, and neutral variations, with 708 documents in total.

    “Instead of providing associated answers as done with question-answering, Grep-BiasIR pairs each query with a relevant and nonrelevant document with feminine, masculine, and neutral variations, with 708 documents in total.”

    From Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as Krieg et al. 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Elizabeth Behm-Morawitz and Dana Mastro. 2009. The effects of the sexualiza- tion of female video game characters on gender stereotyping and female self- concept. Sex roles 61, 11-12 (2009), 808-823.
  2. Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Shirin Seyedsalehi, Morteza Zihayat, and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2021. On the Orthogonality of Bias and Utility in Ad hoc Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Re- search and Development in Information Retrieval. 1748-1752.
  3. Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Morteza Zihayat, and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2021. Exploring Gender Biases in Information Retrieval Relevance Judgement Datasets. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 216-224.
  4. Amy JC Cuddy, Susan T Fiske, and Peter Glick. 2008. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in experimental social psychology 40 (2008), 61-149.
  5. Janet Shibley Hyde, Rebecca S Bigler, Daphna Joel, Charlotte Chucky Tate, and Sari M van Anders. 2019. The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist 74, 2 (2019), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307 · DOI
  6. Alessandro B. Melchiorre, Navid Rekabsaz, Emilia Parada-Cabaleiro, Stefan Brandl, Oleg Lesota, and Markus Schedl. 2021. Investigating gender fairness of recommendation algorithms in the music domain. Inf. Process. Manag. 58, 5 (2021), 102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102666 · DOI
  7. Jahna Otterbacher, Jo Bates, and Paul Clough. 2017. Competent men and warm women: Gender stereotypes and backlash in image search results. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6620-6631.
  8. Navid Rekabsaz, Simone Kopeinik, and Markus Schedl. 2021. Societal Biases in Retrieved Contents: Measurement Framework and Adversarial Mitigation of BERT Rankers. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Virtual Event, Canada). 306-316.
  9. Navid Rekabsaz and Markus Schedl. 2020. Do Neural Ranking Models Intensify Gender Bias?. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2065-2068.
  10. Navid Rekabsaz, Robert West, James Henderson, and Allan Hanbury. 2021. Measuring Societal Biases from Text Corpora with Smoothed First-Order Co- occurrence. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2021, held virtually, June 7-10, 2021. AAAI Press, 549- 560.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krieg, K., Parada-Cabaleiro, E., Medicus, G., Lesota, O., Schedl, M., & Rekabsaz, N.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-03-19
Pages
444-448
OpenAlex
W4327909986
Cited by
31
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5
FWCI
5.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Austrian Science Fund (P33526, LIT-2020-9-SEE-113, DFH 23)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
gender bias, information retrieval, search result bias, stereotypes, gender representation, datasets, social bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review