Cited by 4Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningMental Health via Writing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BHF: BERT-based Hierarchical Attention Fusion Network for Cyberbullying Remarks Detection

Open access
Feng, Ziyang, Su, Jintao, Cao, Junkuo·2022·Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Cyberbullying remarks based on social media platforms have seriously endangered the physical and mental health of netizens. In order to purify the network environment and create a healthy atmosphere, it needs to be identified. At present, most of the existing studies only analyze the overall features of the text, while ignoring the semantic representation of words at local locations. In order to mine the richer semantic features of text, this paper proposes a BHF model, which uses the BERT pre-training model to extract global semantic feature information, and then uses the Hierarchical Attention Network (HAN) to calculate the two-dimensional space of words and short sentences. Local semantic feature information is obtained by fusing two layers of semantic feature information to obtain three-dimensional semantic feature representation of words, short sentences and full text. The experimental results show that based on the BHF model, the semantic features of the text can be better extracted on the three types of problems of cyberbullying detection, and the accuracy of cyberbullying remarks detection can be greatly improved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3578741.3578742

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [ 1 ] Wulczyn E , Thain N , Dixon L. Ex Machina : Personal Attacks Seen at Scale[C] . The Web Conference. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee , 2017 , pp. 1391– 1399 . [1] Wulczyn E, Thain N, Dixon L. Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale[C]. The Web Conference. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2017, pp. 1391–1399.
  2. [ 2 ] Zhou J , Shiren Y E , Wang H. Text Sentiment Classification Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model[J] . Computer Engineering , 2019 . [2] Zhou J, Shiren Y E, Wang H. Text Sentiment Classification Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model[J]. Computer Engineering, 2019.
  3. [ 3 ] Shao L, Y Zhou , University L T . Semantic Rules and RNN Based Sentiment Classification for Online Reviews. 2019 . [3] Shao L, Y Zhou, University L T. Semantic Rules and RNN Based Sentiment Classification for Online Reviews. 2019.
  4. [ 4 ] Zhou Zhihua , Machine Learning(chinese) [w] Beijing : Tsinghua University Press , 2016 , pp. 30– 32 . [4] Zhou Zhihua, Machine Learning(chinese) [w] Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2016, pp. 30–32.
  5. [ 5 ] Yin D , Xue Z , Hong L. Detection of harassment on Web 2. 0[J] . Proceedings of the Content Analysis in the Web Workshop at Www , 2009 , pp. 1– 7 . [5] Yin D, Xue Z, Hong L. Detection of harassment on Web 2. 0[J]. Proceedings of the Content Analysis in the Web Workshop at Www, 2009, pp. 1–7.
  6. [ 6 ] Dinakar K , Reichart R , Lieberman H. Modeling the Detection of Textual Cyberbullying[C]. The Social Mobile Web, Papers from the 2011 ICWSM Workshop , Barcelona , Catalonia, Spain , July 21, 2011 . DBLP, 2011. [6] Dinakar K, Reichart R, Lieberman H. Modeling the Detection of Textual Cyberbullying[C]. The Social Mobile Web, Papers from the 2011 ICWSM Workshop, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 21, 2011. DBLP, 2011.
  7. [ 8 ] Zhao R , Zhou A , Mao K. Automatic detection of cyberbullying on social networks based on bullying features[C]. ACM. ACM , 2016 , pp. 1 – 6 . [8] Zhao R, Zhou A, Mao K. Automatic detection of cyberbullying on social networks based on bullying features[C]. ACM. ACM, 2016, pp. 1–6.
  8. [ 10 ] Wang Kun , Cui Yanpeng, Hu Jianwei . Cyberbullying Detection, Based on the FastText and Word Similarity Schemes[J] . ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing (TALLIP) , 2020 . [10] Wang Kun, Cui Yanpeng, Hu Jianwei. Cyberbullying Detection, Based on the FastText and Word Similarity Schemes[J]. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing (TALLIP), 2020.
  9. [ 11 ] Iwendi C , Srivastava G , Khan S. Cyberbullying detection solutions based on deep learning architectures[J] . Multimedia Systems , 2020 . [11] Iwendi C, Srivastava G, Khan S. Cyberbullying detection solutions based on deep learning architectures[J]. Multimedia Systems, 2020.
  10. [ 12 ] Pitsilis G K , Ramampiaro H , Langseth H. Detecting Offensive Language in Tweets Using Deep Learn [DB/OL] . 2019 . [12] Pitsilis G K, Ramampiaro H, Langseth H. Detecting Offensive Language in Tweets Using Deep Learn [DB/OL]. 2019.
  11. [ 14 ] Karthik D , Roi R , Henry L. Modeling the detection of textual cyberbullying . In Workshop on The Social Mobile Web, ICWSM , 2020 . [14] Karthik D, Roi R, Henry L. Modeling the detection of textual cyberbullying. In Workshop on The Social Mobile Web, ICWSM, 2020.
  12. [ 15 ] Mohit Chandra , Ashwin Pathak, Eesha Dutta , Paryul Jain, Manish Gupta , Manish Shrivastava, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru . 2020 . AbuseAnalyzer: Abuse Detection, Severity and Target Prediction for Gab Posts . In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain (Online). International Committee on Computational Linguistics , 2020, pp. 6277– 6283 . [15] Mohit Chandra, Ashwin Pathak, Eesha Dutta, Paryul Jain, Manish Gupta, Manish Shrivastava, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2020. AbuseAnalyzer: Abuse Detection, Severity and Target Prediction for Gab Posts. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain (Online). International Committee on Computational Linguistics, 2020, pp. 6277–6283.
  13. [ 16 ] Devlin J , Chang M W , Lee K. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding[J] . 2018 . [16] Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding[J]. 2018.
  14. [ 17 ] Ashish Vaswani , Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar , Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones , Aidan N. Gomez , Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin , 2017 , pp. 6000 – 6010 . [17] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, 2017, pp. 6000–6010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Feng, Z., Su, J., & Cao, J.
Affiliations
  • Hainan Normal University (CN)
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-12-23
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W4323520214
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Conference on Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing (MLNLP) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Haikou Key Science and Technology Program (2020-032)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, BERT, hierarchical attention network, attention fusion, semantic feature representation, social media text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review