Cited by 11Human Motion and AnimationHuman Pose and Action Recognition3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Spatio-Temporal Branching for Motion Prediction using Motion Increments

Open access
Wang, Jiexin, Zhou, Yujie, Qiang, Wenwen, Ba, Ying, Su, Bing, Wen, Ji-Rong·2023·Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Abstract

Human motion prediction (HMP) has emerged as a popular research topic due to its diverse applications. Traditional methods rely on hand-crafted features and machine learning techniques, which often struggle to model the complex dynamics of human motion. Recent deep learning-based methods have achieved success by learning spatio-temporal representations of motion, but these models often overlook the reliability of motion data. Additionally, the temporal and spatial dependencies of skeleton nodes are distinct. The temporal relationship captures motion information over time, while the spatial relationship describes body structure and the relationships between different nodes. In this paper, we propose a novel spatio-temporal branching network using incremental information for HMP, which decouples the learning of temporal-domain and spatial-domain features, extracts more motion information, and achieves complementary cross-domain knowledge learning through knowledge distillation. Our approach effectively reduces noise interference and provides more expressive information for characterizing motion by separately extracting temporal and spatial features. We evaluate our approach on standard HMP benchmarks and outperform state-of-the-art methods in terms of prediction accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/JasonWang959/STPMP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3581783.3612330

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Katerina Fragkiadaki, Sergey Levine, Panna Felsen, and Jitendra Malik. 2015. Recurrent network models for human dynamics. In Proceedings of the IEEE inter- national conference on computer vision. 4346-4354.
  2. Jonas Gehring, Michael Auli, David Grangier, Denis Yarats, and Yann N Dauphin. 2017. Convolutional sequence to sequence learning. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1243-1252.
  3. Catalin Ionescu, Dragos Papava, Vlad Olaru, and Cristian Sminchisescu. 2013. Human3. 6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 36, 7 (2013), 1325-1339.
  4. Maosen Li, Siheng Chen, Zijing Zhang, Lingxi Xie, Qi Tian, and Ya Zhang. 2022. Skeleton-Parted Graph Scattering Networks for 3D Human Motion Prediction. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23-27, 2022, Proceedings, Part VI. Springer, 18-36.
  5. Vladimir Pavlovic, James M Rehg, and John MacCormick. 2000. Learning switch- ing linear models of human motion. Advances in neural information processing systems 13 (2000).
  6. Judea Pearl. 2001. Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the seventeenth con- ference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 411-420.
  7. Graham W Taylor, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Sam Roweis. 2006. Modeling human motion using binary latent variables. Advances in neural information processing systems 19 (2006).
  8. Herwin Van Welbergen, Ben JH Van Basten, Arjan Egges, Zs M Ruttkay, and Mark H Overmars. 2010. Real time animation of virtual humans: a trade-off between naturalness and control. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 29. Wiley Online Library, 2530-2554.
  9. Jack Wang, Aaron Hertzmann, and David J Fleet. 2005. Gaussian process dynam- ical models. Advances in neural information processing systems 18 (2005).
  10. Yujie Zhou, Haodong Duan, Anyi Rao, Bing Su, and Jiaqi Wang. 2023. Self- supervised Action Representation Learning from Partial Spatio-Temporal Skele- ton Sequences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09018 (2023). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Qiang, W., Ba, Y., Su, B., & Wen, J.-R.
Affiliations
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Institute of Software (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-10-26
Pages
4290-4299
OpenAlex
W4385968244
Cited by
11
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976206, 61832017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
human motion prediction, knowledge distillation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review