Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promptify: Text-to-Image Generation through Interactive Prompt Exploration with Large Language Models

Brade, Stephen, Wang, Bryan, Sousa, Mauricio, Oore, Sageev, Grossman, Tovi·2023·Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3586183.3606725

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent text-to-image generation systems that generate multiple images for exploration focus on helping users refine their prompts to find the image that fits their desired quality or characteristics.

    “recent text-to-image generation systems that generate multiple images for exploration focus on helping users refine their prompts to find the image that fits their desired quality or characteristics [11, 26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.".
  2. 10.1145/2501988.2502008 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/3526113.3545638 · DOI
  4. Noyan Evirgen and Xiang’Anthony’ Chen. 2023. GANravel: User-Driven Direction Disentanglement in Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00079 (2023). · arXiv
  5. 10.1126/science.1136800 · DOI
  6. Sandra G Hart and LE Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research.[W]: PA Hancock, N. Meshkati (Eds.): Human Mental Workload.
  7. Hyung-Kwon Ko, Gwanmo Park, Hyeon Jeon, Jaemin Jo, Juho Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2022. Large-scale Text-to-Image Generation Models for Visual Artists’ Creative Works. ArXiv abs/2210.08477 (2022). · arXiv
  8. Jiachang Liu Dinghan Shen Yizhe Zhang Bill Dolan Lawrence Carin and Weizhu Chen. 2021. What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?arxiv:2101.06804 [cs.CL] · arXiv
  9. 10.1145/3526113.3545621 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Vivian Liu Jo Vermeulen George Fitzmaurice and Justin Matejka. 2022. 3DALL-E: Integrating Text-to-Image AI in 3D Design Workflows. arxiv:2210.11603 [cs.HC] · arXiv
  11. Elman Mansimov Emilio Parisotto Jimmy Lei Ba and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2016. Generating Images from Captions with Attention. arxiv:1511.02793 [cs.LG] · arXiv
  12. 10.1145/258734.258887 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/3173574.3173943 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1145/1622176.1622214 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Anh Nguyen Jeff Clune Yoshua Bengio Alexey Dosovitskiy and Jason Yosinski. 2017. Plug & Play Generative Networks: Conditional Iterative Generation of Images in Latent Space. arxiv:1612.00005 [cs.CV] · DOI
  16. OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. arxiv:2303.08774 [cs.CL] · arXiv
  17. Jonas Oppenlaender. 2022. A Taxonomy of Prompt Modifiers for Text-To-Image Generation. arxiv:2204.13988 [cs.MM] · arXiv
  18. Aditya Ramesh Prafulla Dhariwal Alex Nichol Casey Chu and Mark Chen. 2022. Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents. arxiv:2204.06125 [cs.CV] · arXiv
  19. Aditya Ramesh Mikhail Pavlov Gabriel Goh Scott Gray Chelsea Voss Alec Radford Mark Chen and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation. arxiv:2102.12092 [cs.CV] · arXiv
  20. Scott Reed Zeynep Akata Santosh Mohan Samuel Tenka Bernt Schiele and Honglak Lee. 2016. Learning What and Where to Draw. arxiv:1610.02454 [cs.CV] · arXiv
  21. Scott Reed, Zeynep Akata, Xinchen Yan, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Bernt Schiele, and Honglak Lee. 2016. Generative Adversarial Text to Image Synthesis. In Proceedings of The 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 48), Maria Florina Balcan and Kilian Q. Weinberger (Eds.). PMLR, New York, New York, USA, 1060–1069. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/reed16.html
  22. 10.1145/2980179.2980242 · DOI
  23. Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli. 2015. Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 37), Francis Bach and David Blei (Eds.). PMLR, Lille, France, 2256–2265. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/sohl-dickstein15.html
  24. John Swales. 2014. The concept of discourse community. Wardle and Downs (2014), 215–28.
  25. 10.1145/571985.571996 · DOI
  26. Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE.Journal of machine learning research 9, 11 (2008).
  27. Yunlong Wang, Shuyuan Shen, and Brian Y Lim. 2023. RePrompt: Automatic Prompt Editing to Refine AI-Generative Art Towards Precise Expressions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09466 (2023). · arXiv
  28. Zijie J. Wang, Evan Montoya, David Munechika, Haoyang Yang, Benjamin Hoover, and Duen Horng Chau. 2022. DiffusionDB: A Large-Scale Prompt Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Image Generative Models. arXiv:2210.14896 [cs] (2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14896 · arXiv
  29. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2023. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. arxiv:2201.11903 [cs.CL] · arXiv
  30. Yuxin Wen Neel Jain John Kirchenbauer Micah Goldblum Jonas Geiping and Tom Goldstein. 2023. Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discovery. arxiv:2302.03668 [cs.LG] · arXiv
  31. Sam Witteveen and Martin Andrews. 2022. Investigating Prompt Engineering in Diffusion Models. arxiv:2211.15462 [cs.CV] · arXiv
  32. 10.1145/2807442.2807448 · DOI
  33. 10.1145/2766908 · DOI
  34. 10.1145/2702123.2702398 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Han Zhang Tao Xu Hongsheng Li Shaoting Zhang Xiaogang Wang Xiaolei Huang and Dimitris Metaxas. 2017. StackGAN: Text to Photo-realistic Image Synthesis with Stacked Generative Adversarial Networks. arxiv:1612.03242 [cs.CV] · DOI · Paper page
  36. Tony Z. Zhao Eric Wallace Shi Feng Dan Klein and Sameer Singh. 2021. Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models. arxiv:2102.09690 [cs.CL] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brade, S., Wang, B., Sousa, M., Oore, S., & Grossman, T.
Affiliations
  • Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada
  • Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Canada
Venue
Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-10-29
Pages
1-14
Cited by
198
References
9
Funders
National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (Grant IRCPJ 545100 - 18)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review