Cited by 28Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataRecommender Systems and TechniquesAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Poisoning Federated Recommender Systems with Fake Users

Open access
Yin, Ming, Xu, Yichang, Fang, Minghong, Gong, Neil Zhenqiang·2024·Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024

Abstract

Federated recommendation is a prominent use case within federated learning, yet it remains susceptible to various attacks, from user to server-side vulnerabilities. Poisoning attacks are particularly notable among user-side attacks, as participants upload malicious model updates to deceive the global model, often intending to promote or demote specific targeted items. This study investigates strategies for executing promotion attacks in federated recommender systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3589334.3645492

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decentralized recommender systems remain vulnerable to threats such as inference attacks and differential attacks.

    “Although decentralized RS inherently provides a privacy protocol, as users preserve their entire historical data, and even FedRec prioritizes user privacy over DCS, it remains vulnerable to threats such as inference attacks and differential attacks [105, 138-142].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, M., Xu, Y., Fang, M., & Gong, N. Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-13
Pages
3555-3565
OpenAlex
W4396757545
Cited by
27
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 2
FWCI
7.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1937787, 1937786, 2125977, 2131859, 2112562)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF2110182)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
federated learning, federated recommendation, poisoning attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review