Cited by 8Water Systems and OptimizationInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisSmart Grid Security and Resilience

Cyber-physical Hardening of the Digital Water Infrastructure

Open access
Cali, Ümit, Catak, F. Özgur, Balogh, Zsolt György, Ugarelli, Rita, Jaatun, Martin Gilje·2023·European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference

Abstract

Water supply and drainage systems, which are categorized as critical infrastructure, serve a crucial role in preserving societal health and well-being. Since climate change effects, harsher regulations, population changes, and aging infrastructure pose problems for these systems, the industry is experiencing a digital transition to meet these concerns. This article addresses Cyber-Physical-Social Systems (CPSS) and its application to water distribution networks, combining cyber, physical, and social components for adaptive, responsive, and intelligent management. This paper’s primary contributions include a review of recent security problems in the water industry, which emphasizes the necessity for stronger security measures. The article also examines how water distribution networks, as CPSS, fit into the interrelated realms of physical infrastructure, digital components, and stakeholder involvement, necessitating an all-encompassing system design and management strategy. In addition, the article investigates various cyber-physical attack scenarios, risk management methodologies, and the crucial role of integrated knowledge in mitigating these risks. In the context of increasing digitalization, the paper emphasizes the significance of taking into account both water infrastructure regulations under social space, such as the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (WFD), and cyberspace-related legal and legislative standards, such as the Network and Information Systems (NIS) Directive, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Cybersecurity Act. By tackling these difficulties and concentrating on privacy concerns, water utilities may contribute to the overall security and resiliency of vital infrastructure while assuring compliance with applicable legislation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3590777.3591408

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cali, Ü., Catak, F. Ö., Balogh, Z. G., Ugarelli, R., & Jaatun, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • IDE, University of Stavanger, Norway
  • Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
  • SINTEF Community (NO)
  • SINTEF Digital (NO)
Venue
European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-06-14
Pages
181-188
OpenAlex
W4378530875
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
7.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference (EICC) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commision (820954)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Water Systems and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Keywords
cyber-physical-social systems, water distribution systems, critical infrastructure security, water utilities, risk management, Water Framework Directive, NIS Directive, GDPR, Cybersecurity Act, data privacy, infrastructure resilience, stakeholder engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review