Standards to Secure the Sensors That Power IoT
Open accessAbstract
Existing security standards do not always offer sufficient protection to secure the Internet of Things.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comprehensive IoT standardization will be pivotal in fully realizing the potential of confidential computing at the IoT tier [102].
“Ultimately, the comprehensive IoT standardization will be pivotal in fully realizing the potential of confidential computing at the IoT tier [102].”
From Confidential Computing Across Edge‐To‐Cloud for Machine Learning: A Survey Study (2025) · cites this paper as [102]
The section “Standards Are Absolutely Essential for Security” describes IoT security standards as important, and “Standards to Secure the Sensors That Power IoT” says existing standards leave gaps. The paper does not address confidential computing or say that comprehensive standardization is pivotal to realizing its potential at the IoT tier. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Confidential Computing Across Edge‐To‐Cloud for Machine Learning: A Survey Study
Zobaed, S., & Amini Salehi, M. (2025) · Software Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.3398 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Ultimately, the comprehensive IoT standardization will be pivotal in fully realizing the potential of confidential computing at the IoT tier [102].”
- Authors
- Kugler, L.
- Affiliations
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Corresponding author
- Kugler, Logan
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2023-05-24
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 14-16
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W4377968128
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Technology and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- Internet of Things security, security standards, IoT sensors, sensor security, cybersecurity standards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
