The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A controlled experiment in program testing and code walkthroughs/inspections
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes an experiment in program testing, employing 59 highly experienced data processing professionals using seven methods to test a small PL/I program. The results show that the popular code walkthrough/inspection method was as effective as other computer-based methods in finding errors and that the most effective methods (in terms of errors found and cost) employed pairs of subjects who tested the program independently and then pooled their findings. The study also shows that there is a tremendous amount of variability among subjects and that the ability to detect certain types of errors varies from method to method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development
Fagan, M. E. (1976) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.153.0182 · Cited by 1,492
Toward a theory of test data selection
Goodenough, J. B., & Gerhart, S. L. (1975) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/390016.808473 · Cited by 514
Toward a theory of test data selection
Goodenough, J. B., & Gerhart, S. L. (1975) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1975.6312836 · Cited by 320
Symbolic Testing and the DISSECT Symbolic Evaluation System
Howden, W. E. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1977.231144 · Cited by 251
Some psychological evidence on how people debug computer programs
Gould, J. D. (1975) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(75)80005-8 · Cited by 237
An Exploratory Study of Computer Program Debugging
Gould, J. D., & Drongowski, P. J. (1974) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872087401600308 · Cited by 134
Myers, G. J. (1976) · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Cited by
What we know about spreadsheet errors
Panko, R. R. (1998) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.1998040102 · Cited by 464
Combination testing strategies: a survey
Grindal, M., Offutt, J., & Andler, S. F. (2005) · Software Testing, Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.319 · Cited by 425
Expertise in debugging computer programs: A process analysis
Vessey, I. (1985) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(85)80054-7 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, G. J.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1978-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 760-768
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2161101035
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 23.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A controlled experiment in program testing and code walkthroughs/inspections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/359588.359602
- The paper
- Myers, G. J. (1978). A controlled experiment in program testing and code walkthroughs/inspections. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/359588.359602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
