Cited by 7Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataSoftware System Performance and ReliabilitySoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Privacy-Preserving Redaction of Diagnosis Data through Source Code Analysis

Open access
Zhou, Lixi, Yu, Lei, Zou, Jia, Min, Hong·2023·35th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management

Abstract

Protecting sensitive information in diagnostic data such as logs, is a critical concern in the industrial software diagnosis and debugging process. While there are many tools developed to automatically redact the logs for identifying and removing sensitive information, they have severe limitations which can cause either over redaction and loss of critical diagnostic information (false positives), or disclosure of sensitive information (false negatives), or both. To address the problem, in this paper, we argue for a source code analysis approach for log redaction. To identify a log message containing sensitive information, our method locates the corresponding log statement in the source code with logger code augmentation, and checks if the log statement outputs data from sensitive sources by using the data flow graph built from the source code. Appropriate redaction rules are further applied depending on the sensitiveness of the data sources to preserve the privacy information in the logs. We conducted experimental evaluation and comparison with other popular baselines. The results demonstrate that our approach can significantly improve the detection precision of the sensitive information and reduce both false positives and negatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3603719.3603734

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 11 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. George J Annas. 2003. HIPAA regulations: a new era of medical-record privacy?New England Journal of Medicine 348 (2003), 1486.
  2. 10.1145/1401890.1401997 · DOI
  3. 10.1609/aaai.v25i2.18851 · DOI
  4. Shilin He, Jieming Zhu, Pinjia He, and Michael R Lyu. 2020. Loghub: a large collection of system log datasets towards automated log analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.06448 (2020). · arXiv
  5. 10.1145/1321440.1321573 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/CLOUD53861.2021.00039 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/DBKDA.2010.17 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/1978672.1978681 · DOI
  9. Protection Regulation. 2018. General data protection regulation. Intouch 25 (2018), 1–5.
  10. 10.1002/asi.23363 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Timothy M Virtue. 2009. Payment card industry data security standard handbook. Wiley Online Library.
  12. Chao Wang, Ronny Ko, Yue Zhang, Yuqing Yang, and Zhiqiang Lin. 2023. TAINTMINI: Detecting Flow of Sensitive Data in Mini-Programs with Static Taint Analysis. In ICSE.

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, L., Yu, L., Zou, J., & Min, H.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
Venue
35th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-07-10
Pages
1-4
ISSN
1551-6393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386204720
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
privacy preservation, sensitive information detection, source code analysis, data flow graphs, false positives, false-negative results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privacy-Preserving Redaction of Diagnosis Data through Source Code Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3603719.3603734
The paper
Zhou, L., Yu, L., Zou, J., & Min, H. (2023). Privacy-Preserving Redaction of Diagnosis Data through Source Code Analysis. 35th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3603719.3603734