The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Privacy-Preserving Redaction of Diagnosis Data through Source Code Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Protecting sensitive information in diagnostic data such as logs, is a critical concern in the industrial software diagnosis and debugging process. While there are many tools developed to automatically redact the logs for identifying and removing sensitive information, they have severe limitations which can cause either over redaction and loss of critical diagnostic information (false positives), or disclosure of sensitive information (false negatives), or both. To address the problem, in this paper, we argue for a source code analysis approach for log redaction. To identify a log message containing sensitive information, our method locates the corresponding log statement in the source code with logger code augmentation, and checks if the log statement outputs data from sensitive sources by using the data flow graph built from the source code. Appropriate redaction rules are further applied depending on the sensitiveness of the data sources to preserve the privacy information in the logs. We conducted experimental evaluation and comparison with other popular baselines. The results demonstrate that our approach can significantly improve the detection precision of the sensitive information and reduce both false positives and negatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 11 · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- George J Annas. 2003. HIPAA regulations: a new era of medical-record privacy?New England Journal of Medicine 348 (2003), 1486.
- 10.1145/1401890.1401997 · DOI
- 10.1609/aaai.v25i2.18851 · DOI
- Shilin He, Jieming Zhu, Pinjia He, and Michael R Lyu. 2020. Loghub: a large collection of system log datasets towards automated log analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.06448 (2020). · arXiv
- 10.1145/1321440.1321573 · DOI
- 10.1109/CLOUD53861.2021.00039 · DOI
- 10.1109/DBKDA.2010.17 · DOI
- 10.1145/1978672.1978681 · DOI
- Protection Regulation. 2018. General data protection regulation. Intouch 25 (2018), 1–5.
- 10.1002/asi.23363 · DOI · Paper page
- Timothy M Virtue. 2009. Payment card industry data security standard handbook. Wiley Online Library.
- Chao Wang, Ronny Ko, Yue Zhang, Yuqing Yang, and Zhiqiang Lin. 2023. TAINTMINI: Detecting Flow of Sensitive Data in Mini-Programs with Static Taint Analysis. In ICSE.
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, L., Yu, L., Zou, J., & Min, H.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
- Venue
- 35th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2023-07-10
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 1551-6393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386204720
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Keywords
- privacy preservation, sensitive information detection, source code analysis, data flow graphs, false positives, false-negative results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privacy-Preserving Redaction of Diagnosis Data through Source Code Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3603719.3603734
- The paper
- Zhou, L., Yu, L., Zou, J., & Min, H. (2023). Privacy-Preserving Redaction of Diagnosis Data through Source Code Analysis. 35th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3603719.3603734