Towards Co-Creating Access and Inclusion: A Group Autoethnography on a Hearing Individual's Journey Towards Effective Communication in Mixed-Hearing Ability Higher Education Settings
Abstract
We present a group autoethnography detailing a hearing student’s journey in adopting communication technologies at a mixed-hearing ability summer research camp. Our study focuses on how this student, a research assistant with emerging American Sign Language (ASL) skills, (in)effectively communicates with deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) peers and faculty during the ten-week program. The DHH members also reflected on their communication with the hearing student. We depict scenarios and analyze the (in)effectiveness of how emerging technologies like live automatic speech recognition (ASR) and typing are utilized to facilitate communication. We outline communication strategies to engage everyone with diverse signing skills in conversations - directing visual attention, pause-for-attention-and-proceed, and back-channeling via expressive body. These strategies promote inclusive collaboration and leverage technology advancements. Furthermore, we delve into the factors that have motivated individuals to embrace more inclusive communication practices and provide design implications for accessible communication technologies within the mixed-hearing ability context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research in higher education highlights the importance of accessible institutions and the shared responsibility of stakeholders for access.
“Research in higher education highlights the importance of accessible institutions and the shared responsibility of stakeholders for access [14, 23, 99].”
From Rethinking “Empowering Technology” in Higher Education Accessibility: A Case Study of Disabled Students’ Experiences at a German University (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Chen, S., Waller, J., Seita, M., Vogler, C., Kushalnagar, R., & Wang, Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Gallaudet University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-05-11
- Pages
- 1-14
- OpenAlex
- W4396832799
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 24.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2150429; 2118824)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- deaf and hard of hearing students, hearing students, American Sign Language, speech recognition, communication strategies, inclusive communication, inclusive higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review