Cited by 121Innovative Human-Technology InteractionPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionUsability and User Interface Design

An Ontology of Dark Patterns Knowledge: Foundations, Definitions, and a Pathway for Shared Knowledge-Building

Open access
Gray, Colin M., Santos, Cristiana Teixeira, Bielova, Nataliia, Mildner, Thomas·2024·Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Deceptive and coercive design practices are increasingly used by companies to extract profit, harvest data, and limit consumer choice. Dark patterns represent the most common contemporary amalgamation of these problematic practices, connecting designers, technologists, scholars, regulators, and legal professionals in transdisciplinary dialogue. However, a lack of universally accepted definitions across the academic, legislative, practitioner, and regulatory space has likely limited the impact that scholarship on dark patterns might have in supporting sanctions and evolved design practices. In this paper, we seek to support the development of a shared language of dark patterns, harmonizing ten existing regulatory and academic taxonomies of dark patterns and proposing a three-level ontology with standardized definitions for 64 synthesized dark pattern types across low-, meso-, and high-level patterns. We illustrate how this ontology can support translational research and regulatory action, including transdisciplinary pathways to extend our initial types through new empirical work across application and technology domains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3613904.3642436

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dark pattern collections offer comprehensive coverage across multiple dark pattern categories corresponding to the ontology and practitioner-identified patterns from real design contexts seen on the web.

    “We chose to leverage these works as they offer comprehensive coverage across multiple dark pattern categories that directly correspond to the ontology [31] presented in Section 2.2. Furthermore, they offer practitioner-identified patterns from real design contexts seen on the web.”
  • Dark patterns enable companies to exploit users for monetary gain, harvest personal data, and reduce consumer autonomy.

    “Broadly, dark patterns enable companies to exploit users for monetary gain, harvest personal data, and reduce consumer autonomy [31].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Nataliia Bielova, Cristiana Santos, and Colin M Gray. 2024. Two worlds apart! Closing the gap between regulating EU consent and user studies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 37 (2024).
  2. Christoph Bösch, Benjamin Erb, Frank Kargl, Henning Kopp, and Stefan Pfattheicher. 2016. Tales from the Dark Side: Privacy Dark Strategies and Privacy Dark Patterns. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2016, 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2016-0038 · DOI
  3. Ahmed Bouhoula, Karel Kubicek, Amit Zac, Carlos Cotrini, and David Basin. 2023. Automated, Large-Scale Analysis of Cookie Notice Compliance. In USENIX Security Symposium.
  4. Jieshan Chen, Jiamou Sun, Sidong Feng, Zhenchang Xing, Qinghua Lu, Xiwei Xu, and Chunyang Chen. 2023. Unveiling the Tricks: Automated Detection of Dark Patterns in Mobile Applications (UIST '23 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1-20. http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05898 arXiv:2308.05898 [cs]. · arXiv
  5. Frederico Fonseca. 2007. The double role of ontologies in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 6 (April 2007), 786-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20565 · DOI
  6. Colin M Gray, Lorena Sánchez Chamorro, Ike Obi, and Ja-Nae Duane. 2023. Mapping the Landscape of Dark Patterns Scholarship: A Systematic Literature Review. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS Companion '23) (Pittsburgh, PA, USA), Vol. 1. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.3596635 · DOI
  7. Colin M Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L Toombs. 2018. The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). dl.acm.org, New York, NY, USA, 534:1-534:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108 · DOI
  8. Colin M Gray, Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Michael Toth, and Damian Clifford. 2021. Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'21). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445779 Manuscript submitted to ACM · DOI
  9. Colin M Gray, Cristiana Santos, Nicole Tong, Thomas Mildner, Arianna Rossi, Johanna Gunawan, and Caroline Sinders. 2023. Dark Patterns and the Emerging Threats of Deceptive Design Practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '23). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3583173 · DOI
  10. Gunawan, Santos, and Kamara. 2022. Redress for Dark Patterns Privacy Harms? A Case Study on Consent Interactions. 2022 ACM Symposium on (2022). https://johannagunawan.com/assets/pdf/gunawan-22-cslaw.pdf
  11. Johanna Gunawan, Amogh Pradeep, David Choffnes, Woodrow Hartzog, and Christo Wilson. 2021. A Comparative Study of Dark Patterns Across Web and Mobile Modalities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2 (Oct. 2021), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479521 · DOI
  12. Shun Hidaka, Sota Kobuki, Mizuki Watanabe, and Katie Seaborn. 2023. Linguistic Dead-Ends and Alphabet Soup: Finding Dark Patterns in Japanese Apps. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1-13. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580942 · DOI
  13. Alison Hung. 2021. KEEPING CONSUMERS IN THE DARK: ADDRESSING "NAGGING" CONCERNS AND INJURY. Columbia Law Review 121, 8 (2021), 2483-2520. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27093855
  14. Simon Koch, Benjamin Altpeter, and Martin Johns. 2023. The OK is not enough: Large Scale Study of Consent Dialogs in Smartphone Applications. In USENIX Security Symposium.
  15. Mark Leiser. 2020. 'Dark Patterns': the case for regulatory pluralism. LawArXiv ea5n2. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ea5n2 · DOI
  16. Jamie Luguri and Lior Jacob Strahilevitz. 2021. Shining a Light on Dark Patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis 13, 1 (March 2021), 43-109. https: //doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa006 · DOI
  17. Kai Lukoff, Alexis Hiniker, Colin M Gray, Arunesh Mathur, and Shruthi Sai Chivukula. 2021. What can CHI do about dark patterns?. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama Japan). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3411763.3441360 · DOI
  18. Arunesh Mathur, Gunes Acar, Michael J Friedman, Elena Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), Article No. 81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359183 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Arunesh Mathur, Mihir Kshirsagar, and Jonathan Mayer. 2021. What Makes a Dark Pattern... Dark? Design Attributes, Normative Considerations, and Measurement Methods. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445610 · DOI
  20. Thomas Mildner and Gian-Luca Savino. 2021. Ethical User Interfaces: Exploring the Effects of Dark Patterns on Facebook. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA '21, Article 464). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451659 · DOI
  21. Thomas Mildner, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R. Doyle, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Rainer Malaka. 2023. About Engaging and Governing Strategies: A Thematic Analysis of Dark Patterns in Social Networking Services. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580695 · DOI
  22. Alberto Monge Roffarello, Kai Lukoff, and Luigi De Russis. 2023. Defining and Identifying Attention Capture Deceptive Designs in Digital Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548. 3580729 · DOI
  23. Midas Nouwens, Ilaria Liccardi, Michael Veale, David Karger, and Lalana Kagal. 2020. Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influence. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376321 · DOI
  24. Ikechukwu Obi, Colin M Gray, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Ja-Nae Duane, Janna Johns, Matthew Will, Ziqing Li, and Thomas Carlock. 2022. Let's Talk About Socio-Technical Angst: Tracing the History and Evolution of Dark Patterns on Twitter from 2010-2021. (July 2022). arXiv:2207.10563 [cs.SI] http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10563 · arXiv
  25. OECD. 2022. Dark commercial patterns. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.1787/44f5e846-en · DOI
  26. Press-Release2022-fq 2022. Press Release: AG Racine announces Google must pay $9.5 million for using "dark patterns" and deceptive location tracking practices that invade users' privacy. https://thedcline.org/2022/12/30/press-release-ag-racine-announces-google-must-pay-9-5-million-for-using- dark-patterns-and-deceptive-location-tracking-practices-that-invade-users-privacy/. https://thedcline.org/2022/12/30/press-release-ag-racine- Manuscript submitted to ACM
  27. Brennan Schaffner, Neha A Lingareddy, and Marshini Chetty. 2022. Understanding Account Deletion and Relevant Dark Patterns on Social Media. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555142 · DOI
  28. Than Htut Soe, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, and Marija Slavkovik. 2022. Automated detection of dark patterns in cookie banners: how to do it poorly and why it is hard to do it any other way. (April 2022). arXiv:2204.11836 [cs.LG] http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11836 · arXiv
  29. Ioannis Stavrakakis, Andrea Curley, Dympna O'Sullivan, Damian Gordon, and Brendan Tierney. 2021. A Framework of Web-Based Dark Patterns that can be Detected Manually or Automatically. (2021). https://doi.org/10.21427/20g8-d176 · DOI
  30. Marieke Van Hofslot, Almila Akdag Salah, Albert Gatt, and Cristiana Santos. 2022. Automatic Classification of Legal Violations in Cookie Banner Texts. In Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (Hybrid), 287-295. https://aclanthology.org/2022.nllp-1.27
  31. Yuki Yada, Jiaying Feng, Tsuneo Matsumoto, Nao Fukushima, Fuyuko Kido, and Hayato Yamana. 2022. Dark patterns in e-commerce: a dataset and its baseline evaluations. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). 3015-3022. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020800 · DOI
  32. José P Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark Patterns in the Design of Games. In Foundations of Digital Games. http://www.diva- portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1043332&dswid=1018 Manuscript submitted to ACM ANALYZED TAXONOMIES OF DARK PATTERNS Manuscript submitted to ACM

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, C. M., Santos, C. T., Bielova, N., & Mildner, T.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-11
Volume
1
Pages
1-22
OpenAlex
W4396832378
Cited by
121
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 17
FWCI
38.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • ANR (22-PECY-0002 IPOP (Interdisciplinary Project on Privacy) project of the Cybersecurity PEPR)
  • National Science Foundation (1909714)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
dark patterns, design ethics, ontology (information science), definitions, consumer choice, data harvesting, regulation, transdisciplinary research, knowledge construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review