Cited by 27Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Fast Simulation of High-Depth QAOA Circuits

Open access
Lykov, Danylo, Shaydulin, Ruslan, Sun, Yue, Alexeev, Yuri, Pistoia, Marco·2023·Proceedings of the SC '23 Workshops of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis

Abstract

Until high-fidelity quantum computers with a large number of qubits become widely available, classical simulation remains a vital tool for algorithm design, tuning, and validation. We present a simulator for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). Our simulator is designed with the goal of reducing the computational cost of QAOA parameter optimization and supports both CPU and GPU execution. Our central observation is that the computational cost of both simulating the QAOA state and computing the QAOA objective to be optimized can be reduced by precomputing the diagonal Hamiltonian encoding the problem. We reduce the time for a typical QAOA parameter optimization by eleven times for n = 26 qubits compared to a state-of-the-art GPU quantum circuit simulator based on cuQuantum. Our simulator is available on GitHub: https://github.com/jpmorganchase/QOKit

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3624062.3624216

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. A. Fabrikant and T. Hogg, "Graph coloring with quantum heuristics," in Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, R. Dechter, M. J. Kearns, and R. S. Sutton, Eds. AAAI Press / The MIT Press, 2002, pp. 22-27.
  2. Z. A. E. M. Dahi, E. Alba, R. Gil-Merino, F. Chicano, and G. Luque, "A survey on quantum computer simulators," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 259257304
  3. T. Khakhulin, R. Schutski, and I. Oseledets, "Learning elimination ordering for tree decomposition problem," in Learning Meets Combinatorial Algorithms at NeurIPS2020, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id= aZ7wAnYs9v1
  4. E. Meirom, H. Maron, S. Mannor, and G. Chechik, "Optimizing tensor network contraction using reinforcement learning," in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 15 278-15 292.
  5. J. Gray and S. Kourtis, "Hyper-optimized tensor network contraction," p. 410, Mar. 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-03-15-410 · DOI
  6. M. Broughton, G. Verdon, T. McCourt, A. J. Martinez, J. H. Yoo, S. V. Isakov, P. Massey, R. Halavati, M. Y. Niu, A. Zlokapa, E. Peters, O. Lockwood, A. Skolik, S. Jerbi, V. Dunjko, M. Leib, M. Streif, D. Von Dollen, H. Chen, S. Cao, R. Wiersema, H.-Y. Huang, J. R. McClean, R. Babbush, S. Boixo, D. Bacon, A. K. Ho, H. Neven, and M. Mohseni, "Tensorflow quantum: A software framework for quantum machine learning," arXiv:2003.02989, 2020. [Online]. Available: 2003.02989 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lykov, D., Shaydulin, R., Sun, Y., Alexeev, Y., & Pistoia, M.
Affiliations
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SC '23 Workshops of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-11-12
Pages
1443-1451
ISSN
2167-4337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388581244
Cited by
27
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Department of Energy Office of Science (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
quantum approximate optimization algorithm, quantum circuit simulation, GPU acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review