Cited by 10Data Management and AlgorithmsHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisRecommender Systems and Techniques

What Your Next Check-in Might Look Like: Next Check-in Behavior Prediction

Open access
Sun, Heli, Cao, Chen, Chu, Xuguang, Hu, Tingting, Lu, Junzhi, He, Liang, Wang, Zhi, He, Hui +1 more·2023·ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology

Abstract

In recent years, the next-POI recommendation has become a trending research topic in the field of trajectory data mining. For protection of user privacy, users’ complete GPS trajectories are difficult to obtain. The check-in information posted by users on social networks has become an important data source for Spatio-temporal Trajectory research. However, state-of-the-art methods neglect the social meaning and the information dissemination function of check-in behavior. The social meaning is an important reason why users are willing to post check-in on social networks, and the information dissemination function means, users can affect each other’s behavior by check-ins. The above characteristics of the check-in behavior make it different from the visiting behavior. We consider a new problem of predicting the next check-in behavior including the check-in time, the POI (point-of-interest) where the check-in is located, functional semantics of the POI, and so on. To solve the proposed problem, we build a multi-task learning model called DPMTM, and a pre-training module is designed to extract dynamic social semantics of check-in behaviors. Our results show that the DPMTM model works well in the check-in behavior problem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3625234

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Chen Cheng, Haiqin Yang, Irwin King, and Michael Lyu. 2012. Fused matrix factorization with geographical and social influence in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 17-23.
  2. Chen Cheng, Haiqin Yang, Michael R. Lyu, and Irwin King. 2013. Where you like to go next: Successive point-of- interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  3. Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merriënboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder -decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP'14). 1724-1734.
  4. Shanshan Feng, Xutao Li, Yifeng Zeng, Gao Cong, Yeow Meng Chee, and Quan Yuan. 2015. Personalized ranking metric embedding for next new POI recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  5. Xutao Li, Gao Cong, Xiao-Li Li, Tuan-Anh Nguyen Pham, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2015. Rank-geofm: A ranking based geographical factorization method for point of interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 433-442.
  6. Xin Liu, Yong Liu, and Xiaoli Li. 2016. Exploring the context of locations for personalized location recommendations.. In Proceedings of the IJCAI. 1188-1194.
  7. Tomás Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR'13).
  8. Matthew Peters, M. Neumann, M. Iyyer, M. Gardner, and L. Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep contextualized word represen- tations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers).
  9. Ruder Sebasian. 2017. An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv:1706.05098. · arXiv
  10. J. J. Xu, K. Zheng, M. M. Chi, Y. Y. Zhu, and X. F. Zhou. 2015. Trajectory big data: Data, applications and techniques. Journal on Communications 36, 12 (2015), 97.
  11. Jia-Dong Zhang, Chi-Yin Chow, and Yanhua Li. 2014. Lore: Exploiting sequential influence for location recommen- dations. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 103-112.
  12. Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2010. GeoLife: A collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 33, 2 (2010), 32-39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, H., Cao, C., Chu, X., Hu, T., Lu, J., He, L., Wang, Z., He, H., & Xiong, H.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
Published
2023-11-14
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 2157-6904 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-6912
OpenAlex
W4387188031
Cited by
10
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key RD Program of China (2020YFB1406900, 2020AAA0107100)
  • National Science Foundation of China (62072365)
  • Science Foundation of Distinguished Young Scholars of Shaanxi (2022JC-48)
  • Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (2022GY-332)
  • Big Mobility Rhino-bird Special Research Program of Tencent (T160-CSIG-2022061300001)
  • Innovation Capability Support Plan of Shaanxi (2021PT-010, 2022PT-33)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
check-in behavior, point-of-interest recommendation, social semantics, information dissemination, multi-task learning, spatio-temporal trajectories, social networks, pre-training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review