Cited by 28Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Scaling Laws For Dense Retrieval

Open access
Fang, Yan, Zhan, Jingtao, Ai, Qingyao, Mao, Jiaxin, Su, Weihang, Chen, Jia, Liu, Yiqun·2024·Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

Scaling laws have been observed in a wide range of tasks, particularly in language generation. Previous studies have found that the performance of large language models adheres to predictable patterns with respect to the size of models and datasets. This helps us design training strategies effectively and efficiently, especially as large-scale training becomes increasingly resource-intensive. Yet, in dense retrieval, such scaling law has not been fully explored. In this study, we investigate how scaling affects the performance of dense retrieval models. We implement dense retrieval models with different numbers of parameters, and train them with various amounts of annotated data. We propose to use the contrastive entropy as the evaluation metric, which is continuous compared with discrete ranking metrics and thus can accurately reflect model performance. Results indicate that the performance of dense retrieval models follows a precise power-law scaling related to the model size and the number of annotations across different datasets and annotation methods. Additionally, we show that the scaling laws help optimize the training process, such as resolving the resource allocation problem under a budget constraint. We believe that these findings significantly contribute to understanding the scaling effect of dense retrieval models and offer meaningful guidance for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3626772.3657743

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As shown by Fang et al., the optimal model sizes become significantly smaller when accounting for inference costs.

    “As shown by Fang et al. [28], the optimal model sizes become significantly smaller when accounting for inference costs.”

    From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

  • The correctness of scaling laws was first proposed in language modeling and then validated in many other areas, including data mixture scaling laws, multimodal scaling laws, and scaling laws specific to information retrieval.

    “The correctness of scaling laws was first proposed in language modeling field and then validated in many other areas, including data mixture scaling laws [26], multimodal scaling laws [27], and scaling laws specific to information retrieval [28].”

    From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, Y., Zhan, J., Ai, Q., Mao, J., Su, W., Chen, J., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Quan Cheng Laboratory (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book) (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-07-10
Pages
1339-1349
OpenAlex
W4400528754
Cited by
28
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 2
FWCI
8.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
QCLZD202301
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
scaling laws, dense retrieval, power-law scaling, model size, training data size, resource allocation, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review