CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Interactive and Immersive DisplaysMuseums and Cultural HeritageInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smart Objects and Replicas: A Survey of Tangible and Embodied Interactions in Museums and Cultural Heritage Sites

Open access
Duranti, Daniele, Spallazzo, Davide, Petrelli, Daniela·2024·Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
DOI 10.1145/3631132
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Tangible and embodied interactions are areas of research within HCI and interaction design. They refer to a way in which interacting with computer systems is closer to the way we interact with the real world. Instead of using devices such as a computer or a phone, we interact using seemingly non-technological objects, by moving our bodies or by using gestures. Since the early 2000s, tangible and embodied interactions have been applied and researched also in cultural heritage and museums, in an attempt to overcome issues induced by screen-based devices that may disengage visitors from the objects, their materiality and the physicality of the visit. This article surveys tangible and embodied interactions in museums, over a period of two decades since 2000. More than 120 projects have been researched and analysed thematically to provide a categorization based on cultural communication, interaction features and museological aspects. This categorization offers a conceptualization of tangible and embodied interactions in museums and cultural heritage; it suggests a terminology to describe the design characteristics of tangible and embodied interaction interventions, therefore facilitating the orientation of future research efforts in the field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3631132

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. Carmelo Ardito, Paolo Buono, Giuseppe Desolda, and Maristella Matera. 2018. From smart objects to smart experiences: An end-user development approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (2018), 51–68.
  2. Elisabetta Bacconi. 2010. Supportare l'esperienza di visita ai musei attraverso oggetti interattivi e interfacce tangibili: Il caso studio del museo delle culture di Lugano. Master's Thesis. Università degli Studi di Siena.
  3. Mafkereseb Kassahun Bekele, Roberto Pierdicca, Emanuele Frontoni, Eva Savina Malinverni, and James Gain. 2018. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 11, 2 (2018), Article 7, 36 pages.
  4. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2006), 77–101.
  5. Mauro Ceconello and Davide Spallazzo. 2016. Vis-à-vis with Leonardo: Designing digital encounters. In Proceedings of the 14th Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. 171–178.
  6. A. Chin. 2010. Chopin museum. designboom magazine | your first source for architecture, design & art news. Retrieved January 1, 2015 from https://www.designboom.com/design/chopin-museum/
  7. Luigina Ciolfi and Liam Bannon. 2002. Designing interactive museum exhibits: Enhancing visitor curiosity through augmented artifacts. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE ’02).
  8. Luigina Ciolfi and Liam J. Bannon. 2003. Learning from museum visits: Shaping design sensitivities. In Proceedings of HCI International 2003. 63–67.
  9. Luigina Ciolfi and Marc MacLoughlin. 2011. Physical keys to digital memories: Reflecting on the role of tangible artefacts in “Reminisce.” In Museum and the Web 2011: Proceedings. Museum and Archives Informatics, Toronto.
  10. Luigina Ciolfi, Daniela Petrelli, Robin Goldberg, Nick Dulake, Matt Willox, Mark Marshall, and Fabio Caparrelli. 2013. Exploring historical, social and natural heritage: Challenges for tangible interaction design at Sheffield General Cemetery. In Proceedings of the NODEM 2013 Conference.
  11. Caroline Claisse, Luigina Ciolfi, and Daniela Petrelli. 2017. Containers of Stories: Using co-design and digital augmentation to empower the museum community and create novel experiences of heritage at a house museum. Design Journal 20, Suppl. 1 (2017), 2906–2918.
  12. Caroline Claisse, Daniela Petrelli, Nick Dulake, Mark T. Marshall, and Luigina Ciolfi. 2018. Multisensory interactive storytelling to augment the visit of a historical house museum. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with the 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM ’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1–8.
  13. Bridget Conley-Zilkic and Nancy Gillette. 2011. Challenging visitors to move from memory to action at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. EXHIBITIONIST Fall (2011), 34–38.
  14. Alma Leora Culén, Ingeborg Eilertsen, Lone Lægreid, Sumit Pandey, Magnus Søyland, and Ingrid Smørgrav Viddal. 2016. Eco-A: Children's engagement in environmental and climate issues. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction. 76–84.
  15. Ella Dagan. 2018. The cloakroom: Documentary narratives in embodied installation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 498–505.
  16. Fabio D'Agnano, Caterina Balletti, Francesco Guerra, and Paolo Vernier. 2015. Tooteko: A case study of augmented reality for an accessible cultural heritage—Digitization, 3D printing and sensors for an audio-tactile experience. International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-5/W4, 5 (2015), 207–213.
  17. Areti Damala, Eva Hornecker, Merel van der Vaart, Dick van Dick, and Ian Ruthven. 2016a. The Loupe: Tangible augmented reality for learning to look at Ancient Greek art. Mediterranean Archeology and Archaeometry 16, 5 (2016), 73–85.
  18. Areti Damala, Merel van der Vaart, Loraine Clarke, Eva Hornecker, Gabriela Avram, Hub Kockelkorn, and Ian Ruthven. 2016b. Evaluating tangible and multisensory museum visiting experiences: Lessons learned from the meSch project. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2016 (MW ’16). 1–18.
  19. Lotte De Reus. 2013. Smart Replicas: Design of an Experience with Responsive 3D Audio, Augmented to Replicas of Seven Porcelain Cups and Saucers. Delft University of Technology.
  20. Stephane Debenedetti. 2003. Investigating the role of companions in the art museum experience. International Journal of Arts Management 5 (2003), 50–63.
  21. Lily Dìaz. 2014. Developing design education and knowledge for heritage. In A New Affair: Design History and Digital Design Museum. Yasar University, Izmir, Turkey.
  22. Christian Dindler and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2009. Motivation in the museum-mediating between everyday engagement and cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the Nordes Conference.
  23. Daniele Duranti, Davide Spallazzo, and Raffaella Trocchianesi. 2016. Tangible interaction in museums and temporary exhibitions: Embedding and embodying the intangible values of cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 6th International Forum of Design as a Process.
  24. Angelo Fraietta. 2020. Transient relics: Temporal tangents to an ancient virtual pilgrimage. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 377–391.
  25. Mike Fraser, John Bowers, Pat Brundell, Claire O'Malley, Stuart Reeves, Steve Benford, Luigina Ciolfi, Kieran Ferris, Paul Gallagher, Tony Hall, Liam Bannon, Gustav Taxén, and Stef Olof Hellström. 2004. Re-tracing the past: Mixing realities in museum settings. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment (ACE ’04).
  26. Mike Fraser, Danae Stanton, Kher Hui Ng, Steve Benford, Claire O'Malley, John Bowers, Gustav Taxén, Kieran Ferris, and Jon Hindmarsh. 2003. Assembling history: Achieving coherent experiences with diverse technologies. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW ’03). 179–198.
  27. Ronan Gaugne, Myrsini Samaroudi, Théophane Nicolas, Jean-Baptiste Barreau, Lauren Garnier, Karina Rodriguez Echavarria, and Valérie Gouranton. 2018. Virtual Reality (VR) interactions with multiple interpretations of archaeological artefacts. In Proceedings of the 16th EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage (EG GCH ’18). 1–9.
  28. Dimitris Grammenos, Damien Michel, Xenophon Zabulis, and Antonis A. Argyros. 2011. PaperView: Augmenting physical surfaces with location-aware digital information. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 57–60.
  29. Daniel A. Guttentag. 2010. Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management 31 (2010), 637–651.
  30. Tony Hall, Luigina Ciolfi, Liam J. Bannon, Mike Fraser, Steve Benford, John Bowers, Chris Greenhalgh, Sten-Olof Hellström, Shahram Izadi, Holger Schnädelbach, and Martin Flintham. 2001. The visitor as virtual archaeologist: Explorations in mixed reality technology to enhance educational and social interaction in the museum. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology, and Cultural Heritage. ACM, New York, NY.
  31. Silvia Rubio Hernández. 2017. Vaprikki Case: Design and Evaluation of an Interactive Mixed-Reality Museum Exhibit. Master's Thesis. University of Tampere.
  32. Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, Xiang Guo, and Pourang Irani. 2014. Designing interactive transparent exhibition cases. In Proceedings of the 3rd International ACM Workshop on Personalized Access to Cultural Heritage (PATCH ’14). ACM, New York, NY.
  33. Nic Hollingworth, Kate Allen, Gosia Kwiatkowska, Andy Minnion, and Faustina Hwang. 2014. Interactive sensory objects for and by people with learning disabilities. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 109 (2014), 11–20.
  34. Sherry Hsi and Holly Fait. 2005. RFID enhances visitors’ museum experience at the Exploratorium. Communications of the ACM 48 (2005), 60–65.
  35. Chun-Ko Hsieh, I.-Ling Liu, Neng-Hao Yu, Yueh-Hsuan Chiang, Hsiang-Tao Wu, Ying-Jui Chen, and Yi-Ping Hung. 2010. Yongzheng emperor's interactive tabletop: Seamless multimedia system in a museum context. In ACM Multimedia, A. Del Bimbo, S.-F. Chang, and A. Smeulders (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, 1453–1456.
  36. Jens Keil, Michael Zollner, Mario Becker, Folker Wientapper, Timo Engelke, and Harald Wuest. 2011. The House of Olbrich—An augmented reality tour through architectural history. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB ’11). 243–252.
  37. Marlene Kettner. 2013. Interactive Histories: How Might Interactive Exhibition Elements Improve the Understanding of Islamicate History? Master's Thesis. Umeå Institute of Design,| Umeå University.
  38. H. Kockelkorn. 2013. Seal hunting in the museum, testing a meSch prototype. meSch. Retrieved January 1, 2015 from http://www.mesch-project.eu/seal-hunting-in-the-museum-testing-a-mesch-prototype/
  39. H. Kockelkorn. 2015. Why do we use smart replicas in museums? meSch. Retrieved January 5, 2015 from http://www.mesch-project.eu/why-we-are-using-smart-replicas/
  40. Anna Koster. 2008. WiiCon:Acceleration Based Real-Time Conducting Gesture Recognition for Personal Orchestra. Diploma Thesis. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  41. Dirk vom Lehn and Christian Heath. 2003. Displacing the object: Mobile technologies and interpretative resources. Archives & Museum Informatics 2 (2003), 1–15.
  42. Dirk vom Lehn, Jon Hindmarsh, Paul Luff, and Christian Heath. 2007. Engaging constable: Revealing art with new technology. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1485–1494.
  43. Nina Levent and Alvaro Pascual-Leone (Eds.). 2014. The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Smell, Memory and Space. Rowman & Littlefield.
  44. Anna Loparev, Lauren Westendorf, Margaret Flemings, Jennifer Cho, Romie Littrell, Anja Scholze, and Orit Shaer. 2017. BacPack: Exploring the role of tangibles in a museum exhibit for bio-design. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 111–120.
  45. Joyce Ma, Lisa Sindorf, Isaac Liao, and Jennifer Frazier. 2015. Using a tangible versus a multi-touch graphical user interface to support data exploration at a museum exhibit. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 33–40.
  46. Laura Mann and Oleg Fryazinov. 2019. 3D printing for mixed reality hands-on museum exhibit interaction. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Posters. 1–2.
  47. Mark T. Marshall, Nick Dulake, Luigina Ciolfi, Daniele Duranti, Hub Kockelkorn, and Daniela Petrelli. 2016. Using tangible smart replicas as controls for an interactive museum exhibition. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, 159–167.
  48. L. Maye. 2016. The Loupe strikes again at the Hunt Museum in Ireland. meSch. Retrieved January 12, 2017 from http://www.mesch-project.eu/the-loupe-strikes-again-revealing-narratives-in-a-museum-in-ireland/
  49. David K. McGookin, Laura Maye, Ling Chen, and Mikko Kytö. 2018. An initial study of multisensory interaction for outdoor heritage sites. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  50. Maria Rita Minelli. 2013. Realtà aumentata, ricostruzioni 3D e “Teche parlanti” svelano i tesori Etruschi di Cerveteri. Archeomatica 4 (2013).
  51. Reese Muntean, Kate Hennessy, Alissa Antle, Susan Rowley, Jordan Wilson, Brendan Matkin, Rachael Eckersley, Perry Tan, and Ron Wakkary. 2015. ʔeləw̓k̓w—Belongings: A Tangible Interface for Intangible Cultural Heritage. London, UK.
  52. Eslam Nofal, Georgia Panagiotidou, Rabee M. Reffat, Hendrik Hameeuw, Vanessa Boschloos, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2020. Situated tangible gamification of heritage for supporting collaborative learning of young museum visitors. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 13 (2020), 1–24.
  53. Eslam Nofal, Rabee M. Reffat, Vanessa Boschloos, Hendrik Hameeuw, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2018a. The role of tangible interaction to communicate tacit knowledge of built heritage. Heritage 1 (2018), 414–436.
  54. Eslam Nofal, Robin Stevens, Thomas Coomans, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2018b. Communicating the spatiotemporal transformation of architectural heritage via an in-situ projection mapping installation. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 11 (2018), e00083.
  55. Donald Norman. 2010. Natural user interfaces are not natural. Interactions 17 (2010), 6–10.
  56. Elena Not, Dario Cavada, Stefano Maule, Adriano Venturini, and Anna Pisetti. 2019. Digital augmentation of historical objects through tangible interaction. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 12, 3 (2019), Article 18, 19 pages.
  57. Elena Not and Daniela Petrelli. 2018. Blending customisation, context-awareness and adaptivity for personalised tangible interaction in cultural heritage. Internal Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (2018), 3–19.
  58. Johanna Okerlund, Evan Segreto, Casey Grote, Lauren Westendorf, Anja Scholze, Romie Littrell, and Orit Shaer. 2016. SynFlo: A tangible museum exhibit for exploring bio-design. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’16). 141–149.
  59. Javier Pereda, Patricia A. Murrieta-Flores, Nichols Radburn, Lois South, and Christian Monaghan. 2020. Afrobits: An interactive installation of African music and the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. In Proceedings of EVA London 2020. 106–111.
  60. Sofia Pescarin, Enzo d'Annibale, Bruno Fanini, and Daniele Ferdani. 2018. Prototyping on site virtual museums: The case study of the co-design approach to the Palatine Hill in Rome (Barberini Vineyard) exhibition. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with the 2018 24th International Conference in Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM ’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1–8.
  61. Daniela Petrelli. 2017. Industry 4.0: Is it time for interaction design craftsmanship? Design Journal 20, Suppl. 1 (2017), 2735–2745.
  62. Daniela Petrelli, Luigina Ciolfi, Dick van Dijk, Eva Hornecker, Elena Not, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Integrating material and digital: A new way for cultural heritage. Interactions 4 (2013), 58–63.
  63. Daniela Petrelli, Nick Dulake, Mark Marshall, Hub Kockelkorn, and Anna Pisetti. 2016. Do it together: The effect of curators, designers, and technologists sharing the making of the new interactive visitors’ experiences. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2016 (MW ’16).
  64. Daniela Petrelli, Nick Dulake, Mark T. Marshall, Andrew Roberts, Frances McIntosh, and Joe Savage. 2018. Exploring the potential of the Internet of Things at a heritage site through co-design practice. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) Held Jointly with the 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM ’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1–8.
  65. Daniel Pletinckx. 2007. Virtex: A Multisensory Approach for Exhibiting Valuable Objects. Interactive Institute AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
  66. Elizabeth Pye. 2007. The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museum and Heritage Contexts. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
  67. Tarun Jung Rawat. 2005. Wonder objects: Magic and interactive storytelling. Cognitive Science Research Papers, University of Sussex 577 (2005), 91–96.
  68. Stéphanie Rey, Pierre Mauriéras, Anke Brock, and Célia Picard. 2018. Totem de personnalisation: Conception d'une interface tangible pour le choix de parcours de visite dans les musées. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM ’18). 219–226.
  69. Stéphanie Rey, Célia Picard, Yanis Fatmi, Fanny Franco, S. Guilbert, Jérémie Manéré, Cristophe Bortolaso, Mustapha Derras, Nadine Couture, and Anke M. Brock. 2020. Build your own Hercules: Helping visitors personalize their museum experience. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 495–502.
  70. Mette Muxoll Schou and Anders Sundnes Løvlie. 2020. The Diary of Niels: Affective engagement through tangible interaction with museum artifacts. In Proceedings of the Euro-Mediterranean Conference.
  71. Michael James Scott, Alcwyn Parker, Edward J. Powley, Rob Saunders, Jenny R. Lee, Phoebe Herring, Douglas Brown, and Tanya Krzywinska. 2018. Towards an interaction blueprint for mixed reality experiences in GLAM spaces: The augmented telegrapher at Porthcurno Museum. In Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference. 1–5.
  72. Ferhat Sen and Reha Dişçioğlu. 2011. Design of an interactive cultural heritage experience: The historical orchestra. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Electronic Art.
  73. Nina Simon. 2009. Mixing digital and physical: The Holocaust Museum's handwritten pledge wall. Museum 2.0. Retrieved January 1, 2015 from http://museumtwo.blogspot.it/2009/05/making-promises-with-mixed-media.html
  74. Nina Simon. 2010. The Participatory Museum. Museum 2.0, Santa Cruz, CA.
  75. Samantha Sportun. 2014. The future landscape of 3D in museums. In The Multisensory Museum: Crossing Disciplinary Perspective on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 331–340.
  76. Reed Stevens and Sandra Martell. 2003. Leaving a trace: Supporting museum visitor interaction and interpretation with digital media annotation systems. Journal of Museum Education 28, 2 (2003), 25–31.
  77. Sylaiou Styliani, Liarokapis Fotis, Kotsakis Kostas, and Patias Petros. 2009. Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. Journal of Cultural Heritage 10, 4 (2009), 520–528.
  78. Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Karen Tanenbaum, and Alissa Antle. 2010. The Reading Glove: Designing interactions for object based tangible storytelling. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference (AH ’10). ACM, New York, NY, Article 19, 9 pages.
  79. Tetsuya Ueda, Ayako Hanai, and Keiko Kamei. 2011. Intuitively interactive pamphlets using augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE ’11). ACM, New York, NY, Article 85, 2 pages.
  80. UNESCO. 2000. Synthesis Report of the Expert Meeting on “Authenticity and Integrity in an African Context,” Great Zimbabwe National Monument, Zimbabwe, 26-29 May 2000. UNESCO.
  81. Roberto Ivo Fernandes Vaz. 2014. Interfaces tangíveis no contexto da experiência da visita a um museu. Master's Thesis. Departamento de Comunicação e Arte, Universidade de Aveiro.
  82. Ron Wakkary and Marek Hatala. 2007. Situated play in a tangible interface and adaptive audio museum guide. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11 (2007), 171–191.
  83. Ron Wakkary, Marek Hatala, Kevin Muise, Karen Tanenbaum, Greg Corness, Barbia Mohabbati, and Jim Budd. 2009. Kurio: A museum guide for families. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, 215–222.
  84. Andy Wheatcroft. 2015. The Fryderyk Chopin Museum. Andy Wheatcroft's Portfolio. Retrieved January 1, 2015 from https://web.archive.org/web/20150501212340/http://andywheatcroft.co.uk/96300/773024/projects/the-fryderyk-chopin-museum
  85. Su Zheng, Martin Adam, and Andree Woodcock. 2005. Surprise and illusion: Design strategies for interactive museum exhibits. In Proceedings of the 7th international Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’13). 29–30.
  86. Salvatore Zingale. 2016. Design as translation activity: A semiotic overview. In Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society—Future-Focused Thinking, P. Lloyd and E. Bohemia (Eds.). Design Research Society, Brighton, UK, 1062–1072.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Duranti, D., Spallazzo, D., & Petrelli, D.
Affiliations
  • Independent Researcher, Italy
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Published
2024-01-13
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
1-32
ISSN
  • 1556-4711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4673
DOI
10.1145/3631132
OpenAlex
W4388210377
Cited by
35
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
  • Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
tangible interaction, embodied interaction, smart objects, replicas, museums, cultural heritage, museum visitor engagement, gesture-based interaction, screen-based interaction, museology, cultural communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review