Cited by 2Network Security and Intrusion DetectionSmart Grid Security and ResilienceAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A physical signal-based anomaly detection for industrial terminal

Open access
Mei, Wenming, Liu, Wei, Chen, Jianfei, Li, Ke·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering

Abstract

With the development of industry, industrial control systems are widely used in critical infrastructures. As one of the most significant components, the industrial terminals include Programmable Logic Controller, Distributed Control Systems, Remote Terminal Unit, and etc. Attacks against industrial terminals can cause catastrophic damage since they are directly related to business in the field. Unfortunately, traditional protection methods, such as intrusion detection systems and antivirus software, are not applicable to industrial terminals which are resource-constrained. In this paper, we propose an anomaly detection method for industrial controllers based on physical signals. The basic idea is to detect abnormal execution in a industrial terminal through analyzing its physical signals, including system power consumption and CPU usage. To effectively analyze the physical signals, a Transformer-based neural network is trained on the time series dataset to predict the next normal physical signals. The abnormal execution is detected by comparing the predicted signals and actual ones. We evaluate the proposed method on a real world dataset collected from a smart grid terminal, and the results show that the detection accuracy is over 97%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3650400.3650508

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Shane S. Clark Benjamin Ransford Amir Rahmati Shane Guineau Jacob M. Sorber Wenyuan Xu and Kevin Fu. 2013. WattsUpDoc: Power Side Channels to Nonintrusively Discover Untargeted Malware on Embedded Medical Devices. In HealthTech. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1304726
  2. Alexander Gostev. 2012. The Flame: Questions and Answers. Securelist (2012).
  3. Dave Lee. 2012. Flame: Massive cyber-attack discovered, researchers say. BBC News 5, 28 (2012), 2012.
  4. Matti Mantere, Ilkka Uusitalo, Mirko Sailio, and Sami Noponen. 2012. Challenges of Machine Learning Based Monitoring for Industrial Control System Networks. 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (2012), 968–972. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:10450597
  5. Yong Peng, Chong Xiang, Haihui Gao, Dongqing Chen, andWang Ren. 2015. Industrial Control System Fingerprinting and Anomaly Detection. In Critical Infrastructure Protection. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13624144
  6. Jill Slay and Michael Miller. 2007. Lessons Learned from the Maroochy Water Breach. In Critical Infrastructure Protection. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2517075
  7. 10.5555/2206293 · DOI
  8. Ashish Vaswani Noam M. Shazeer Niki Parmar Jakob Uszkoreit Llion Jones Aidan N. Gomez Lukasz Kaiser and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In NIPS. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13756489
  9. Han, Yi, Matthew Chan, Zahra Aref, Nils Ole Tippenhauer and S. Zonouz. “Hiding in Plain Sight? On the Efficacy of Power Side Channel-Based Control Flow Monitoring.” USENIX Security Symposium (2022).

Metadata

Authors
Mei, W., Liu, W., Chen, J., & Li, K.
Affiliations
  • State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN)
  • NARI Group (China) (CN)
  • State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-10-20
Pages
651-658
OpenAlex
W4394898112
Cited by
2
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering (EITCE) (publishedVersion)
Funders
State Grid Corporation of China (Grand No. 5700-202358294A-1-1-ZN)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
anomaly detection, physical signals, power consumption, CPU utilization, transformer models, time series forecasting, smart grid, industrial control systems, resource-constrained devices, cyberattack detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A physical signal-based anomaly detection for industrial terminal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3650400.3650508
The paper
Mei, W., Liu, W., Chen, J., & Li, K. (2023). A physical signal-based anomaly detection for industrial terminal. Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3650400.3650508