Cited by 68Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Training-Free Consistent Text-to-Image Generation

Open access
Tewel, Yoad, Kaduri, Omri, Gal, Rinon, Kasten, Yoni, Wolf, Lior, Chechik, Gal, Atzmon, Yuval·2024·ACM Transactions on Graphics

Abstract

Text-to-image models offer a new level of creative flexibility by allowing users to guide the image generation process through natural language. However, using these models to consistently portray the same subject across diverse prompts remains challenging. Existing approaches fine-tune the model to teach it new words that describe specific user-provided subjects or add image conditioning to the model. These methods require lengthy persubject optimization or large-scale pre-training. Moreover, they struggle to align generated images with text prompts and face difficulties in portraying multiple subjects. Here, we present ConsiStory, a training-free approach that enables consistent subject generation by sharing the internal activations of the pretrained model. We introduce a subject-driven shared attention block and correspondence-based feature injection to promote subject consistency between images. Additionally, we develop strategies to encourage layout diversity while maintaining subject consistency. We compare ConsiStory to a range of baselines, and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on subject consistency and text alignment, without requiring a single optimization step. Finally,ConsiStory can naturally extend to multi-subject scenarios, and even enable training-free personalization for common objects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3658157

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tewel, Y., Kaduri, O., Gal, R., Kasten, Y., Wolf, L., Chechik, G., & Atzmon, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Independent Scientist, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • NVIDIA Research, Tel Aviv, Israel
Venue
ACM Transactions on Graphics
Published
2024-07-19
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7368
OpenAlex
W4400818431
Cited by
68
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 4
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
text-to-image generation, training-free fine-tuning, image-text alignment, consistory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review