Research on Power Terminal Attack Detection Technology Based on ATT&CK Multi-modal Perception
Abstract
There are a large number of power terminals and complex environments, facing prominent attack risks, which are related to the safe operation of the entire power grid. This paper proposes a power terminal attack detection technology based on the ATT&CK framework, which analyzes and detects attack behaviors through multi-modal perception. Collect attack-related data from various power terminals, combine it with the Bayesian framework to determine the attack technology, map the attack stages and realize the reconstruction of the attack path and the prediction of the attack target. Finally, the technology is applied through the data lake and microservice fusion architecture. This paper proposes a fusion method of attack data in electric power information network, solves the problem of correlation between the ATT&CK framework and the attack process, and expands the attack behavior detection capability of multi-source data fusion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wang et al. [131] used a data lake and microservices architecture (MSA) to implement a distributed system capable of real-time analysis of large-scale heterogeneous logs.
“A data lake and microservices architecture (MSA) are used to implement a distributed system capable of real-time analysis of large-scale heterogeneous logs.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
Wang et al. [131] proposed a multimodal anomaly detection method that integrates heterogeneous data sources to precisely detect security threats at power Distribution Terminal Units (DTUs).
“Wang et al. [131] proposed a multimodal anomaly detection method that integrates heterogeneous data sources to precisely detect security threats at power Distribution Terminal Units (DTUs).”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
In a realistic power grid test environment, Wang et al. [131]'s multimodal detector achieved approximately 90% detection accuracy with an average detection delay of 2-4 min, significantly improving attack identification and phase prediction compared with single-source IDS solutions.
“In a realistic power grid test environment, the multimodal detector achieved approximately 90% detection accuracy with an average detection delay of 2-4 min, significantly improving attack identification and phase prediction compared with single-source IDS solutions.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
Wang et al. [131]'s detection framework defines stage-wise detection points based on the MITRE ATT&CK threat model and adopts both feature-level and decision-level fusion to learn cross-domain correlations.
“The detection framework defines stage-wise detection points based on the MITRE ATT&CK threat model and adopts both feature-level and decision-level fusion to learn cross-domain correlations.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
Wang et al. [131] used real operational logs and a Simulated Power Terminal Dataset to construct hybrid cyber-physical data including network traffic, system and application logs, asset information, control commands, and sensor measurements.
“Using real operational logs and a Simulated Power Terminal Dataset, they construct hybrid cyber-physical data including network traffic, system and application logs, asset information, control commands, and sensor measurements.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
Some hybrid data fusion works couple fused anomaly scores with higher-level decision modules-such as attack-stage modeling, ATT&CK-based threat mapping, or reinforcement learning-based model selection-so that hybrid data directly drives mitigation policies and adaptive defense strategies in real time.
“Third, some works couple fused anomaly scores with higher-level decision modules-such as attack-stage modeling, ATT&CK-based threat mapping, or reinforcement learning-based model selection-so that hybrid data directly drives mitigation policies and adaptive defense strategies in real time [128,131,132].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
Several hybrid data fusion frameworks are designed to operate across multiple datasets and domains by providing generic pipelines for heterogeneous feature processing and multi-modal fusion, rather than redesigning ad hoc detectors for each individual system.
“Second, several frameworks are designed to operate across multiple datasets and domains by providing generic pipelines for heterogeneous feature processing and multi-modal fusion, rather than redesigning ad hoc detectors for each individual system [124,129,131].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Wang, R., Zou, X., Li, Y., Li, F., Liu, J., & Wang, R.
- Affiliations
- State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Cryptography, Network Security and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-01-19
- Pages
- 287-294
- OpenAlex
- W4401105335
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Cryptography, Network Security and Communication Technology (CNSCT) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- multisensory perception, multi-source data fusion, attack path reconstruction, power grid cybersecurity, data lakes, microservices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review