Cited by 13Parallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityTopic Modeling

Towards End-to-End Optimization of LLM-based Applications with Ayo

Open access
Tan, Xin, Jiang, Yimin, Yang, Yitao, Xu, Hong·2025·Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 2

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Large language model (LLM)-based applications consist of both LLM and non-LLM components, each contributing to the end-to-end latency. Despite great efforts to optimize LLM inference, end-to-end workflow optimization has been overlooked. Existing frameworks employ coarse-grained orchestration with task modules, which confines optimizations to within each module and yields suboptimal scheduling decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3676641.3716278

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teola, Alto, and Parrot assume static or deterministically defined DAGs and cannot work with dynamic agent workloads like ReAct-styled ones whose dependency graphs evolve at runtime.

    “One shared limitation of Teola, Parrot, and Alto is that they all assume static or deterministically defined DAGs and could not work with dynamic agent workloads like ReAct-styled ones whose dependency graphs evolve at runtime.”
  • Ayo, Alto, and Parrot assume static workflows and do not apply to dynamic agents.

    “Ayo [49], Alto [46], and Parrot [34] assume static workflows and do not apply to dynamic agents.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, X., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., & Xu, H.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Unaffiliated, Beijing, China
Venue
Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 2
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-03-30
Pages
1302-1316
OpenAlex
W4408901326
Cited by
13
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 13
FWCI
11.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (C7004-22G)
  • CUHK (4937007,4937008,5501329,5501517)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
end-to-end optimization, large language models, end-to-end delay, workflow scheduling, task orchestration, inference optimization, Ayo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review