The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
They May Have Seen My ChatGPT Tab: Exploring Social Perceptions of AI-Assisted Writing for ESL Students
Abstract
Many English as a Second Language (ESL) students have begun to use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to improve their writing artifacts. In this process, however, ESL students are also facing scrutiny due to the social expectation of independent language acquisition. Therefore, we propose a study design consisting of diary studies and interviews to investigate the ways ESL students perceive and navigate the nuanced social dynamics around using generative AI in their writing. Through this study, we aim to gain a deeper understanding of the social-technical implication of AI usage in second language acquisition, and to offer suggestions to ESL learners and educators on ways to incorporate AI into their educational journey.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, people may feel that disclosure of AI use would reduce perceptions of the authenticity [54] and quality [87] of their work.”
From Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24750 · Cited by 919
Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: an exploratory investigation
Yan, D. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4 · Cited by 713
AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2 · Cited by 589
Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views
Jakesch, M., Bhat, A., Buschek, D., Zalmanson, L., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581196 · Cited by 265
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1109/SNAMS58071.2022.10062688 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.009 · DOI
- 10.51535/tell.1314355 · DOI
- 10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107592 · DOI
- 10.1145/3573051.3596200 · DOI
- Jess Hohenstein Dominic DiFranzo Rene F. Kizilcec Zhila Aghajari Hannah Mieczkowski Karen Levy Mor Naaman Jeff Hancock and Malte Jung. 2021. Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.05756 arXiv:2102.05756 [cs]. · DOI
- 10.30935/cedtech · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2023.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1145/3290605.3300469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/su151814025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3491102.3502030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3491102.3517731 · DOI · Paper page
- Hannah Mieczkowski and Jeffrey Hancock. 2022. Examining Agency Expertise and Roles of AI Systems in AI-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/asnv4 · DOI
- 10.1108/LHTN-02-2023-0032 · DOI
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2304.02478 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
He, J., Houde, S., & Weisz, J. D. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713522 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Fussell, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2024-05-11
- Pages
- 13-15
- OpenAlex
- W4403413381
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- generative AI, AI-assisted writing, ESL learners, English as a second language, second language writing, artificial intelligence in language teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
